Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00227/0.00227, allocations: 84.05 kB / 19.18 MB, free: 2.523 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.003012/0.003012, allocations: 164.9 kB / 22.46 MB, free: 5.359 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.695/1.695, allocations: 177.1 MB / 202.8 MB, free: 9.188 MB / 190.1 MB " [Timeout remaining time 178] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings master/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings master/package.mo): time 3.178/3.178, allocations: 389 MB / 0.633 GB, free: 1.051 MB / 0.5919 GB " [Timeout remaining time 176] Using package Buildings with version 13.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300] "Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 2.264e-06/2.264e-06, allocations: 0 / 1 GB, free: 7.312 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 3.798e-05/4.025e-05, allocations: 2.281 kB / 1 GB, free: 7.309 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.04149/0.04153, allocations: 29.11 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 10.09 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02491/0.06644, allocations: 11.36 MB / 1.04 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003265/0.06971, allocations: 83.31 kB / 1.04 GB, free: 14.62 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004362/0.07407, allocations: 1.103 MB / 1.041 GB, free: 13.51 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.008449/0.08252, allocations: 2.301 MB / 1.043 GB, free: 11.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006906/0.08942, allocations: 1.945 MB / 1.045 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02909/0.1185, allocations: 20.43 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 4.781 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01266/0.1312, allocations: 5.317 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 15.39 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.02932/0.1605, allocations: 8.885 MB / 1.079 GB, free: 6.508 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01717/0.1777, allocations: 5.726 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 0.7695 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.006169/0.1838, allocations: 0.7344 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 36 kB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01505/0.1989, allocations: 2.552 MB / 1.088 GB, free: 13.48 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.009022/0.2079, allocations: 3.249 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 10.22 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01542/0.2233, allocations: 3.188 MB / 1.094 GB, free: 7.027 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03522/0.2585, allocations: 15.44 MB / 1.109 GB, free: 7.551 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.166e-05/0.2586, allocations: 0 / 1.109 GB, free: 7.551 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 3.607e-06/0.2586, allocations: 0 / 1.109 GB, free: 7.551 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0007834/0.2593, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.109 GB, free: 7.547 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.05064/0.31, allocations: 11.58 MB / 1.12 GB, free: 11.87 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 7.055e-05/0.31, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.12 GB, free: 11.86 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007121/0.3172, allocations: 0.9358 MB / 1.121 GB, free: 10.91 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.03135/0.3485, allocations: 9.377 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 1.441 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0006032/0.3491, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 1.117 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.003152/0.3523, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 0.6406 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 1.078/1.43, allocations: 6.367 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 153.8 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001039/1.43, allocations: 10.31 kB / 1.137 GB, free: 153.8 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004657/1.43, allocations: 144.2 kB / 1.137 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000139/1.431, allocations: 100 kB / 1.138 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008707/1.439, allocations: 4.805 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 152.2 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06556/1.505, allocations: 26.04 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 140.9 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01656/1.521, allocations: 5.66 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 139.2 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005853/1.527, allocations: 2.468 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 138.6 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03465/1.562, allocations: 9.899 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 135.7 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005273/1.567, allocations: 2.49 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 134.6 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=219): time 6.743e-06/1.567, allocations: 0 / 1.188 GB, free: 134.6 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=227): time 0.04145/1.609, allocations: 13.74 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 128.5 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001398/1.609, allocations: 127.7 kB / 1.201 GB, free: 128.4 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03266/1.641, allocations: 10.25 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 125.3 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001879/1.643, allocations: 114.8 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 125.2 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004869/1.648, allocations: 3.345 MB / 1.215 GB, free: 122.7 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002797/1.651, allocations: 0.8877 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 122 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002524/1.653, allocations: 1.193 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 121.5 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.872e-05/1.654, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.217 GB, free: 121.2 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006152/1.66, allocations: 3.462 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 119.5 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007251/1.667, allocations: 6.075 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 114.2 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05404/1.721, allocations: 36.31 MB / 1.262 GB, free: 76.99 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001422/1.721, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.262 GB, free: 76.96 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization): time 0.01974/1.741, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 66.79 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001213/1.741, allocations: 77.69 kB / 1.272 GB, free: 66.71 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001576/1.741, allocations: 84 kB / 1.272 GB, free: 66.63 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001863/1.743, allocations: 0.7099 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 65.9 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005106/1.748, allocations: 1.462 MB / 1.274 GB, free: 64.44 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01157/1.76, allocations: 13.55 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 50.19 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01474/1.774, allocations: 1.186 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 49 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.002263/1.777, allocations: 272 kB / 1.289 GB, free: 48.73 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01724/1.794, allocations: 7.098 MB / 1.296 GB, free: 41.62 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00999/1.804, allocations: 6.07 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 34.3 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07052/1.874, allocations: 36.25 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001974/1.875, allocations: 24 kB / 1.337 GB, free: 12.68 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.03092/1.906, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 2.516 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002968/1.906, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.347 GB, free: 2.441 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0003816/1.906, allocations: 84 kB / 1.347 GB, free: 2.359 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00279/1.909, allocations: 0.714 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 1.629 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.007155/1.916, allocations: 1.462 MB / 1.349 GB, free: 168 kB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01809/1.934, allocations: 13.56 MB / 1.362 GB, free: 1.91 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01519/1.949, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.363 GB, free: 0.7305 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.002433/1.952, allocations: 272 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 476 kB / 1.107 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (630): * Single equations (assignments): 622 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.004488/1.956, allocations: 0.7534 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0056/1.962, allocations: 0.6828 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 15.02 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01677/1.979, allocations: 5.079 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 9.922 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 5.711e-05/1.979, allocations: 24 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 9.898 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.546e-05/1.979, allocations: 4 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 9.895 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007789/1.987, allocations: 3.923 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 5.938 MB / 1.123 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03591/2.023, allocations: 11.37 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 2.175e-05/2.023, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.385 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002899/2.025, allocations: 0.5893 MB / 1.386 GB, free: 9.906 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001942/2.027, allocations: 0.5717 MB / 1.386 GB, free: 9.312 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003424/2.028, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.386 GB, free: 9.18 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01644/2.044, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 11.05 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.502e-06/2.044, allocations: 4 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 11.05 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01735/2.062, allocations: 7.076 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 3.891 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.009233/2.071, allocations: 1.677 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 2.211 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.004619/2.075, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.408 GB, free: 2.09 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.008654/2.084, allocations: 0.616 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 1.473 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.000777/2.085, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.409 GB, free: 1.309 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000416/2.085, allocations: 79.95 kB / 1.409 GB, free: 1.23 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02572/2.111, allocations: 7.182 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 10.05 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 6.21e-07/2.111, allocations: 0 / 1.416 GB, free: 10.05 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.03178/2.143, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 6.086 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (205): * Single equations (assignments): 194 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003444/2.146, allocations: 0.6011 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 5.508 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03179/2.178, allocations: 13.09 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 8.227 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.669e-05/2.178, allocations: 4 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 8.223 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.006944/2.185, allocations: 2.946 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 5.184 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02551/2.21, allocations: 2.747 MB / 1.439 GB, free: 2.496 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.05003/2.26, allocations: 18.1 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 332 kB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008811/2.269, allocations: 4.869 MB / 1.461 GB, free: 11.42 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01971/2.289, allocations: 6.266 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 5.156 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00375/2.293, allocations: 412.4 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 4.754 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 2.395e-06/2.293, allocations: 0 / 1.468 GB, free: 4.754 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2894/2.582, allocations: 135.5 MB / 1.6 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 1.357 GB " [Timeout remaining time 297] make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300] (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=800 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 800] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "" [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 16.62024363875389]