Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001674/0.001674, allocations: 99.64 kB / 18.94 MB, free: 2.551 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002066/0.002066, allocations: 217.1 kB / 22.25 MB, free: 4.855 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.536/1.536, allocations: 230.6 MB / 256 MB, free: 7.801 MB / 206.1 MB " [Timeout remaining time 178] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.1.1-maint.12.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.1.1-maint.12.x/package.mo): time 3.407/3.407, allocations: 0.4892 GB / 0.7943 GB, free: 35.62 MB / 0.6231 GB " [Timeout remaining time 176] Using package Buildings with version 12.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.1.1-maint.12.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_12_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_12_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) [Timeout 300] "Notification: Buildings requested package Modelica of version 4.0.0. Modelica 4.1.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed. Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002045/0.002045, allocations: 68.05 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 25.78 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.36/0.362, allocations: 176.1 MB / 1.325 GB, free: 2.348 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03522/0.3973, allocations: 29.3 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 4.938 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01932/0.4166, allocations: 11.4 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 9.508 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002447/0.419, allocations: 83.31 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 9.426 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00368/0.4227, allocations: 1.088 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 8.332 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007362/0.4301, allocations: 2.231 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 6.094 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006051/0.4361, allocations: 1.917 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 4.184 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02521/0.4613, allocations: 20.22 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 15.92 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009561/0.4709, allocations: 5.432 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 10.41 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01478/0.4857, allocations: 6.83 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 3.578 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01406/0.4997, allocations: 6.195 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 13.36 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00337/0.5031, allocations: 0.7344 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 12.63 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009054/0.5122, allocations: 2.533 MB / 1.411 GB, free: 10.09 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006426/0.5186, allocations: 3.136 MB / 1.414 GB, free: 6.949 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01006/0.5286, allocations: 3.757 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 3.176 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02291/0.5516, allocations: 15.34 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 3.789 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.111e-06/0.5516, allocations: 0 / 1.433 GB, free: 3.789 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.355e-06/0.5516, allocations: 4 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 3.785 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000446/0.552, allocations: 0 / 1.433 GB, free: 3.785 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03222/0.5842, allocations: 11.66 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 8.031 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.956e-05/0.5843, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 8.023 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001442/0.5857, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 7.523 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004363/0.5901, allocations: 0.9402 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 6.578 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02524/0.6153, allocations: 9.374 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 13.11 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004658/0.6158, allocations: 338.7 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 12.78 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002158/0.6179, allocations: 475.9 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 12.31 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01666/0.6346, allocations: 6.376 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 5.609 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0002259/0.6348, allocations: 15.83 kB / 1.462 GB, free: 5.594 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001563/0.6364, allocations: 144 kB / 1.462 GB, free: 5.453 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0002041/0.6366, allocations: 99.92 kB / 1.462 GB, free: 5.355 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01159/0.6482, allocations: 4.805 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 0.5391 MB / 1.154 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06525/0.7134, allocations: 26.58 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 5.566 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01317/0.7266, allocations: 5.676 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 15.88 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004811/0.7314, allocations: 2.455 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 13.42 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02922/0.7606, allocations: 9.916 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 3.465 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004834/0.7655, allocations: 2.49 MB / 1.513 GB, free: 0.8633 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=219): time 8.086e-06/0.7655, allocations: 4 kB / 1.513 GB, free: 0.8594 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=227): time 0.03456/0.8, allocations: 13.75 MB / 1.526 GB, free: 3.059 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001341/0.8002, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.526 GB, free: 2.906 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02715/0.8273, allocations: 10.47 MB / 1.536 GB, free: 8.438 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001366/0.8287, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.537 GB, free: 8.32 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006276/0.835, allocations: 3.36 MB / 1.54 GB, free: 4.941 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002349/0.8373, allocations: 0.891 MB / 1.541 GB, free: 4.043 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004338/0.8416, allocations: 1.206 MB / 1.542 GB, free: 2.828 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001635/0.8418, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.542 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006757/0.8486, allocations: 3.464 MB / 1.545 GB, free: 15.04 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009423/0.858, allocations: 6.078 MB / 1.551 GB, free: 7.723 MB / 1.248 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07318/0.9312, allocations: 36.32 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 2.043 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001195/0.9313, allocations: 28 kB / 1.587 GB, free: 2.016 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization): time 0.02269/0.954, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.597 GB, free: 7.828 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001909/0.9542, allocations: 75.77 kB / 1.597 GB, free: 7.75 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002135/0.9544, allocations: 84 kB / 1.597 GB, free: 7.668 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001985/0.9564, allocations: 0.7085 MB / 1.598 GB, free: 6.938 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00585/0.9622, allocations: 1.47 MB / 1.599 GB, free: 5.465 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.7548/1.717, allocations: 13.71 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 246.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01143/1.728, allocations: 1.175 MB / 1.614 GB, free: 246.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001623/1.73, allocations: 274.3 kB / 1.614 GB, free: 246.4 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01459/1.745, allocations: 7.097 MB / 1.621 GB, free: 245.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008093/1.753, allocations: 6.066 MB / 1.627 GB, free: 241 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04972/1.802, allocations: 36.26 MB / 1.662 GB, free: 223.9 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001765/1.803, allocations: 24 kB / 1.662 GB, free: 223.9 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01436/1.817, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.672 GB, free: 214.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.564e-05/1.817, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.672 GB, free: 214.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000131/1.817, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.672 GB, free: 214 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001498/1.819, allocations: 0.7074 MB / 1.673 GB, free: 213.2 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004743/1.823, allocations: 1.466 MB / 1.674 GB, free: 211.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008465/1.832, allocations: 13.73 MB / 1.688 GB, free: 197.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009663/1.842, allocations: 1.18 MB / 1.689 GB, free: 196.2 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001323/1.843, allocations: 272 kB / 1.689 GB, free: 195.9 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (630): * Single equations (assignments): 622 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00179/1.845, allocations: 0.7619 MB / 1.69 GB, free: 195.2 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002461/1.847, allocations: 0.6909 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 194.9 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.0076/1.855, allocations: 5.094 MB / 1.696 GB, free: 189.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.313e-05/1.855, allocations: 24 kB / 1.696 GB, free: 189.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 8.706e-06/1.855, allocations: 4 kB / 1.696 GB, free: 189.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004276/1.859, allocations: 3.927 MB / 1.699 GB, free: 185.8 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02531/1.884, allocations: 11.81 MB / 1.711 GB, free: 173.9 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.598e-06/1.884, allocations: 0 / 1.711 GB, free: 173.9 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002288/1.887, allocations: 0.589 MB / 1.711 GB, free: 173.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001324/1.888, allocations: 0.5809 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 172.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003775/1.888, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.712 GB, free: 172.6 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008508/1.897, allocations: 13.61 MB / 1.725 GB, free: 158.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.276e-06/1.897, allocations: 4 kB / 1.725 GB, free: 158.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01033/1.907, allocations: 7.103 MB / 1.732 GB, free: 151.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00568/1.913, allocations: 1.697 MB / 1.734 GB, free: 149.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002206/1.915, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.734 GB, free: 149.6 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005379/1.92, allocations: 0.6299 MB / 1.735 GB, free: 149 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004592/1.921, allocations: 165.6 kB / 1.735 GB, free: 148.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002553/1.921, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.735 GB, free: 148.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01248/1.934, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.742 GB, free: 141.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.1e-07/1.934, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.742 GB, free: 141.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01701/1.951, allocations: 3.975 MB / 1.746 GB, free: 137.5 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (205): * Single equations (assignments): 194 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01118/1.962, allocations: 8.147 MB / 1.754 GB, free: 129.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01684/1.979, allocations: 13.11 MB / 1.767 GB, free: 116 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.218e-05/1.979, allocations: 1.969 kB / 1.767 GB, free: 116 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003614/1.982, allocations: 2.955 MB / 1.77 GB, free: 112.9 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01439/1.997, allocations: 2.908 MB / 1.773 GB, free: 110.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1291/2.126, allocations: 80.1 MB / 1.851 GB, free: 26.68 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00746/2.133, allocations: 4.874 MB / 1.856 GB, free: 21.77 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01301/2.146, allocations: 6.432 MB / 1.862 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006314/2.153, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.865 GB, free: 12.36 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.392e-06/2.153, allocations: 4 kB / 1.865 GB, free: 12.36 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.379/2.532, allocations: 211.7 MB / 2.071 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 1.498 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 25.55/28.08, allocations: 11.94 kB / 2.071 GB, free: 10.73 MB / 1.498 GB " [Timeout remaining time 272] (rm -f Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 400 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_12_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 420.0] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_12.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "Error: Could not read variable sla.sta_b.T in file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.sta_b.T from file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.T in file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.T from file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.T in file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.T from file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow in file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow from file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow in file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow from file Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! " [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 35.65894042700529]