Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001394/0.001394, allocations: 99.64 kB / 18.95 MB, free: 2.668 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001587/0.001587, allocations: 211.4 kB / 22.25 MB, free: 5.262 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.402/1.402, allocations: 230.6 MB / 256 MB, free: 7.797 MB / 206.1 MB " [Timeout remaining time 178] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.1-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.1-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.64/2.64, allocations: 476 MB / 0.7699 GB, free: 4.73 MB / 0.6231 GB " [Timeout remaining time 177] Using package Buildings with version 11.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.1-maint.11.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) [Timeout 300] "Notification: Buildings requested package Modelica of version 4.0.0. Modelica 4.1.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed. Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002216/0.002216, allocations: 65.56 kB / 1.117 GB, free: 41.14 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3299/0.3321, allocations: 170 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 12.43 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03451/0.3666, allocations: 29.26 MB / 1.311 GB, free: 15.08 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01871/0.3854, allocations: 11.39 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 3.66 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002101/0.3875, allocations: 83.31 kB / 1.322 GB, free: 3.578 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003123/0.3906, allocations: 1.088 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 2.484 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005936/0.3965, allocations: 2.235 MB / 1.326 GB, free: 248 kB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00507/0.4016, allocations: 1.92 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 14.33 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02249/0.4241, allocations: 20.2 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 10.08 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008464/0.4325, allocations: 5.444 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 4.559 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01281/0.4454, allocations: 6.741 MB / 1.359 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01171/0.4571, allocations: 6.218 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 7.578 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00247/0.4595, allocations: 0.7383 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 6.84 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007181/0.4667, allocations: 2.529 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 4.309 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004509/0.4712, allocations: 3.132 MB / 1.371 GB, free: 1.168 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.007747/0.479, allocations: 3.75 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 13.4 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01981/0.4988, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.482e-06/0.4988, allocations: 0 / 1.39 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.044e-06/0.4988, allocations: 4 kB / 1.39 GB, free: 14.03 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004128/0.4992, allocations: 0 / 1.39 GB, free: 14.03 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02903/0.5282, allocations: 11.66 MB / 1.401 GB, free: 2.27 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.744e-05/0.5283, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.401 GB, free: 2.262 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001402/0.5297, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 1.762 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003687/0.5334, allocations: 0.9402 MB / 1.403 GB, free: 0.8164 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02286/0.5562, allocations: 9.372 MB / 1.412 GB, free: 7.352 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004487/0.5567, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.412 GB, free: 7.027 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002005/0.5587, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 6.555 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01465/0.5733, allocations: 6.365 MB / 1.419 GB, free: 15.86 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001649/0.5735, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.419 GB, free: 15.84 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001024/0.5745, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.419 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000189/0.5747, allocations: 103.9 kB / 1.419 GB, free: 15.6 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009905/0.5846, allocations: 4.809 MB / 1.424 GB, free: 10.78 MB / 1.123 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06241/0.647, allocations: 26.57 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01313/0.6601, allocations: 5.671 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 10.14 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004815/0.665, allocations: 2.459 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 7.684 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02685/0.6918, allocations: 9.92 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004395/0.6962, allocations: 2.49 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 11.12 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=219): time 6.843e-06/0.6962, allocations: 0 / 1.47 GB, free: 11.12 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=227): time 0.03315/0.7294, allocations: 13.75 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001207/0.7295, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.483 GB, free: 13.17 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02437/0.7538, allocations: 10.47 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 2.703 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001029/0.7549, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 2.582 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00539/0.7603, allocations: 3.353 MB / 1.497 GB, free: 15.21 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002219/0.7625, allocations: 0.8988 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 14.3 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003818/0.7663, allocations: 1.198 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 13.1 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001447/0.7664, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.499 GB, free: 12.79 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006183/0.7726, allocations: 3.46 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 9.309 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009001/0.7816, allocations: 6.074 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 1.992 MB / 1.201 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06358/0.8452, allocations: 36.31 MB / 1.544 GB, free: 12.32 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001005/0.8453, allocations: 24 kB / 1.544 GB, free: 12.29 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization): time 0.01865/0.864, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 2.105 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001036/0.8641, allocations: 73.67 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 2.027 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001514/0.8642, allocations: 84 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 1.945 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001761/0.866, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.555 GB, free: 1.215 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005554/0.8715, allocations: 1.466 MB / 1.556 GB, free: 15.75 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01503/0.8866, allocations: 13.73 MB / 1.57 GB, free: 1.223 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009651/0.8962, allocations: 1.17 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 52 kB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001251/0.8975, allocations: 280 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 15.78 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01227/0.9097, allocations: 7.091 MB / 1.578 GB, free: 8.668 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00807/0.9178, allocations: 6.07 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 1.355 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.7276/1.645, allocations: 36.26 MB / 1.619 GB, free: 296.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001458/1.646, allocations: 24.47 kB / 1.619 GB, free: 296.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02309/1.669, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.629 GB, free: 294.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.74e-05/1.669, allocations: 72.98 kB / 1.629 GB, free: 294.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001499/1.669, allocations: 83.88 kB / 1.629 GB, free: 294.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001657/1.67, allocations: 0.7081 MB / 1.63 GB, free: 294.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005157/1.676, allocations: 1.472 MB / 1.632 GB, free: 294.4 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009438/1.685, allocations: 13.73 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 283.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009293/1.694, allocations: 1.179 MB / 1.646 GB, free: 283.8 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.000977/1.695, allocations: 274.7 kB / 1.646 GB, free: 283.7 MB / 1.311 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (630): * Single equations (assignments): 622 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001403/1.697, allocations: 0.76 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 283.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001897/1.699, allocations: 0.6998 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 283.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.00744/1.706, allocations: 5.078 MB / 1.653 GB, free: 281.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.401e-05/1.706, allocations: 19.84 kB / 1.653 GB, free: 281.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.253e-05/1.706, allocations: 16.14 kB / 1.653 GB, free: 281.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004484/1.711, allocations: 3.926 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 280.5 MB / 1.311 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03107/1.742, allocations: 11.8 MB / 1.668 GB, free: 275.8 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.637e-05/1.742, allocations: 3.75 kB / 1.668 GB, free: 275.8 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.003408/1.745, allocations: 0.5834 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 275.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001909/1.747, allocations: 0.5807 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 275.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003973/1.747, allocations: 128.7 kB / 1.669 GB, free: 275.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01205/1.759, allocations: 13.6 MB / 1.683 GB, free: 261 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.27e-06/1.759, allocations: 4 kB / 1.683 GB, free: 261 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0139/1.773, allocations: 7.107 MB / 1.69 GB, free: 254.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006797/1.78, allocations: 1.69 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 252.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002795/1.783, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.691 GB, free: 252.4 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006678/1.79, allocations: 0.6096 MB / 1.692 GB, free: 251.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004967/1.79, allocations: 177.4 kB / 1.692 GB, free: 251.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000299/1.79, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.692 GB, free: 251.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01452/1.805, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.699 GB, free: 244.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.3e-07/1.805, allocations: 0 / 1.699 GB, free: 244.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01715/1.822, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.703 GB, free: 240.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (205): * Single equations (assignments): 194 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01317/1.835, allocations: 8.153 MB / 1.711 GB, free: 232.1 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02278/1.858, allocations: 13.1 MB / 1.724 GB, free: 218.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.536e-05/1.858, allocations: 8 kB / 1.724 GB, free: 218.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005491/1.864, allocations: 2.944 MB / 1.727 GB, free: 215.8 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02335/1.887, allocations: 2.91 MB / 1.73 GB, free: 213 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1532/2.04, allocations: 80.12 MB / 1.808 GB, free: 129.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004707/2.045, allocations: 4.874 MB / 1.813 GB, free: 124.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01141/2.056, allocations: 6.424 MB / 1.819 GB, free: 118.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004489/2.061, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.822 GB, free: 115.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.323e-06/2.061, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.822 GB, free: 115.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.3152/2.376, allocations: 211.7 MB / 2.029 GB, free: 1.691 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 23.47/25.85, allocations: 10.25 kB / 2.029 GB, free: 1.684 MB / 1.404 GB " [Timeout remaining time 273] (rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 400 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 420.0] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "Error: Could not read variable sla.sta_b.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.sta_b.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! " [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 32.506997286342084]