Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001378/0.001378, allocations: 113.9 kB / 18.94 MB, free: 2.93 MB / 14.72 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002092/0.002092, allocations: 191.7 kB / 22.23 MB, free: 5.105 MB / 14.72 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.587/1.587, allocations: 225.6 MB / 251 MB, free: 13.03 MB / 206.1 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 178]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS 3.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"[/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS 3.0.0-master/Examples/PPD12/Structure.mo:527:21-527:482:writable] Warning: Lexer treating \\ as \\\\, since \\e is not a valid Modelica escape sequence.
[/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS 3.0.0-master/Examples/PPD12/Structure.mo:527:21-527:490:writable] Warning: Lexer treating \\ as \\\\, since \\< is not a valid Modelica escape sequence.
[/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS 3.0.0-master/Media/Refrigerants/R410A/package.order:0:0-0:0:readonly] Warning: Found duplicate names in package.order file: A, B, C.
[/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS 3.0.0-master/Media/Refrigerants/R410A/package.mo:2:1-70:10:writable] Warning: C was referenced in the package.order file, but was not found in package.mo, C/package.mo or C.mo.
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS 3.0.0-master/package.mo): time 1.192/1.192, allocations: 177.9 MB / 484.2 MB, free: 5.328 MB / 382.1 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 178]
Using package IDEAS with version 3.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS 3.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic")
translateModel(IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic") [Timeout 660]
"Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002049/0.002049, allocations: 64.17 kB / 0.674 GB, free: 10.77 MB / 0.4981 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5844/0.5865, allocations: 95.16 MB / 0.7669 GB, free: 7.965 MB / 0.5762 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic): time 0.9555/1.542, allocations: 363.9 MB / 1.122 GB, free: 60.2 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.1249/1.667, allocations: 76.1 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 59.11 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.02337/1.69, allocations: 0.5848 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 59.11 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.0236/1.714, allocations: 6.703 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 58.98 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.05018/1.764, allocations: 14.9 MB / 1.218 GB, free: 56.39 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.02846/1.792, allocations: 10.62 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 49.89 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.07381/1.866, allocations: 56.54 MB / 1.284 GB, free: 5.68 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.02987/1.896, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 6.805 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.04954/1.946, allocations: 17.73 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 6.035 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.04109/1.987, allocations: 16.37 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 6.766 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.01193/1.999, allocations: 1.898 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 4.867 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.02659/2.025, allocations: 6.153 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 15 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.01469/2.04, allocations: 6.327 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 8.906 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.02811/2.068, allocations: 10.83 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.06112/2.129, allocations: 30.09 MB / 1.386 GB, free: 1.316 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.042e-05/2.129, allocations: 3.984 kB / 1.386 GB, free: 1.312 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.603e-06/2.129, allocations: 0 / 1.386 GB, free: 1.312 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.001058/2.13, allocations: 0 / 1.386 GB, free: 1.312 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 1949
 * Number of variables: 1949
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0696/2.2, allocations: 20.84 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 12.54 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.654e-05/2.2, allocations: 16.03 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.02044/2.22, allocations: 3.193 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 9.32 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.05684/2.277, allocations: 20.27 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 5.312 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.001023/2.278, allocations: 0.6515 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 4.664 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.006025/2.284, allocations: 0.8983 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 3.766 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.05333/2.338, allocations: 17.3 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 2.25 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0003027/2.338, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 2.242 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.003904/2.342, allocations: 318.7 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 1.934 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0002618/2.342, allocations: 211.9 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 1.727 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.04883/2.391, allocations: 21.52 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 12.19 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.7423/3.133, allocations: 79.87 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 430.4 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.02932/3.162, allocations: 12.8 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 425 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.01782/3.18, allocations: 9.373 MB / 1.569 GB, free: 419.9 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.07941/3.26, allocations: 32.5 MB / 1.601 GB, free: 397.8 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.02209/3.282, allocations: 10.82 MB / 1.611 GB, free: 391.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyInStream (simulation): time 0.03196/3.314, allocations: 8.243 MB / 1.619 GB, free: 387 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=548): time 4.457e-05/3.314, allocations: 0 / 1.619 GB, free: 387 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=832): time 1.019/4.333, allocations: 248.6 MB / 1.862 GB, free: 138.5 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : valCoo.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[2].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow = 0.0
2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0
[
  -1.0 , -1.0 ;
  1.0 , 1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[2].m_flow
]
  =
[
  tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + (-spl1.res1.m_flow) - valCoo.m_flow - valNorth.res3.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ;
  pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0
2 : valCoo.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[2].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow = 0.0
[
  1.0 , 1.0 ;
  -1.0 , -1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[1].m_flow
]
  =
[
  pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + (-spl1.res1.m_flow) - valCoo.m_flow - valNorth.res3.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0
2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0
[
  -1.0 , -1.0 ;
  1.0 , 1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ;
  tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0
]
  =
[
  tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + (-spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0) - valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ;
  pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.1071/4.44, allocations: 51.73 MB / 1.913 GB, free: 85.65 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03018/4.47, allocations: 16.86 MB / 1.929 GB, free: 68.91 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.005833/4.476, allocations: 221.7 kB / 1.929 GB, free: 68.69 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.008718/4.485, allocations: 7.459 MB / 1.937 GB, free: 61.25 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.01132/4.496, allocations: 3.135 MB / 1.94 GB, free: 58.16 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0187/4.515, allocations: 4.392 MB / 1.944 GB, free: 53.75 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.126e-05/4.515, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.944 GB, free: 53.45 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.03659/4.551, allocations: 25.09 MB / 1.969 GB, free: 28.33 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.5548/5.106, allocations: 27.92 MB / 1.996 GB, free: 418.1 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.08237/5.188, allocations: 46.01 MB / 2.041 GB, free: 408.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.893e-05/5.188, allocations: 11.31 kB / 2.041 GB, free: 408.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=1548) (initialization): time 0.6529/5.841, allocations: 145.7 MB / 2.183 GB, free: 307.7 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.599e-05/5.841, allocations: 49.7 kB / 2.183 GB, free: 307.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.908e-05/5.842, allocations: 44 kB / 2.184 GB, free: 307.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.604/6.446, allocations: 125.4 MB / 2.306 GB, free: 182.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.01902/6.465, allocations: 3.22 MB / 2.309 GB, free: 179.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.1676/6.632, allocations: 86.79 MB / 2.394 GB, free: 92.55 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.2248/6.857, allocations: 10.72 MB / 2.404 GB, free: 81.82 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.01124/6.868, allocations: 1.652 MB / 2.406 GB, free: 80.16 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0562/6.924, allocations: 28.09 MB / 2.433 GB, free: 52.05 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04111/6.965, allocations: 27.3 MB / 2.46 GB, free: 23.71 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.6328/7.598, allocations: 44.76 MB / 2.504 GB, free: 399.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001023/7.598, allocations: 10.22 kB / 2.504 GB, free: 399.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=1548) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.6618/8.26, allocations: 143.5 MB / 2.644 GB, free: 307.5 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000108/8.26, allocations: 53.7 kB / 2.644 GB, free: 307.5 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.197e-05/8.26, allocations: 44 kB / 2.644 GB, free: 307.4 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.5994/8.86, allocations: 124.1 MB / 2.765 GB, free: 183.7 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.01674/8.877, allocations: 3.181 MB / 2.768 GB, free: 180.5 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.1682/9.045, allocations: 93.7 MB / 2.86 GB, free: 87.11 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.2198/9.265, allocations: 10.78 MB / 2.87 GB, free: 76.33 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.007565/9.272, allocations: 1.617 MB / 2.872 GB, free: 74.71 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 203
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 10 ($whenCondition1,stepValve.count,$PRE.stepValve.count,stepValve.T_start,$PRE.stepValve.T_start,pumpHea.stage,stepPump.pulseStart,$PRE.stepPump.pulseStart,stepPump.y,$whenCondition2)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (964):
 * Single equations (assignments): 942
 * Array equations: 6
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 4
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 8
 * Torn equation systems: 3
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Equation system details (not torn):
 * Constant Jacobian (size): 0 systems
 * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 0 systems
 * Non-linear Jacobian (size): 8 systems
   {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}
 * Without analytic Jacobian (size): 0 systems
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 1 system
   {(28,28,89.3%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 2 systems
   {(33,119), (33,119)}
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.01076/9.283, allocations: 0.7264 MB / 2.873 GB, free: 74 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.01012/9.293, allocations: 1.613 MB / 2.874 GB, free: 73.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.7045/9.998, allocations: 69.71 MB / 2.942 GB, free: 396.4 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.2583/10.26, allocations: 80.87 MB / 3.021 GB, free: 380.1 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 0.0001967/10.26, allocations: 33.31 kB / 3.021 GB, free: 380.1 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.2457/10.5, allocations: 79.76 MB / 3.099 GB, free: 312.4 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.4023/10.9, allocations: 207.6 MB / 3.302 GB, free: 104.9 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 0.0001169/10.9, allocations: 0 / 3.302 GB, free: 104.9 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01353/10.92, allocations: 2.295 MB / 3.304 GB, free: 102.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 1.231/12.15, allocations: 142.1 MB / 3.443 GB, free: 372.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.005225/12.15, allocations: 0.7828 MB / 3.444 GB, free: 372.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.1387/12.29, allocations: 71.64 MB / 3.514 GB, free: 349.8 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[4].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
2 : tabsSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[8].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
3 : valSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[8].port_b.p
4 : valSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[4].port_b.p
[
  -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 ;
  0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ;
  0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 ;
  1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0
]
  *
[
  valSouth2[4].port_b.p ;
  valSouth2[2].port_a.p ;
  valSouth2[8].port_b.p ;
  tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
]
  =
[
  -tabsSouth2[4].dp ;
  -tabsSouth2[8].dp ;
  -valSouth2[8].dp ;
  -valSouth2[4].dp
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0
2 : spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsNorth2[7].m_flow) - $cse422 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[2].m_flow = 0.0
[
  1.0 , 1.0 ;
  -1.0 , -1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[2].m_flow
]
  =
[
  pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ;
  tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + $cse422 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - spl1.res1.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : valSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[8].port_b.p
2 : valSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[4].port_b.p
3 : tabsSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[4].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
4 : tabsSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[8].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
[
  1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ;
  0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 ;
  0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ;
  -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0
]
  *
[
  valSouth2[8].port_b.p ;
  tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p ;
  valSouth2[4].port_b.p ;
  valSouth2[2].port_a.p
]
  =
[
  -valSouth2[8].dp ;
  -valSouth2[4].dp ;
  -tabsSouth2[4].dp ;
  -tabsSouth2[8].dp
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2[2].port_a.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsNorth2[7].m_flow) - $cse422 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[2].m_flow = 0.0
2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0
[
  -1.0 , -1.0 ;
  1.0 , 1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[2].m_flow
]
  =
[
  tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + $cse422 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - spl1.res1.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ;
  pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
2 : valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
3 : valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
4 : tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
[
  1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ;
  0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ;
  0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ;
  1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
  =
[
  -tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = 0.0
2 : spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 = 0.0
[
  1.0 , 1.0 ;
  -1.0 , -1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
  =
[
  pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 ;
  tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
2 : valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
3 : valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
4 : tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
[
  1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ;
  0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ;
  0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ;
  1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
  =
[
  -tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = 0.0
2 : spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 = 0.0
[
  1.0 , 1.0 ;
  -1.0 , -1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
  =
[
  pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 ;
  tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 0.0945/12.39, allocations: 48.18 MB / 3.561 GB, free: 303.5 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.3076/12.69, allocations: 117.9 MB / 3.676 GB, free: 186.7 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.02079/12.72, allocations: 7.292 MB / 3.683 GB, free: 179.9 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.008734/12.72, allocations: 188 kB / 3.683 GB, free: 179.7 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.1194/12.84, allocations: 5.329 MB / 3.688 GB, free: 174.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.006071/12.85, allocations: 1.134 MB / 3.689 GB, free: 173.2 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.004818/12.85, allocations: 0.8806 MB / 3.69 GB, free: 172.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02184/12.88, allocations: 11.52 MB / 3.702 GB, free: 160.9 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.11e-07/12.88, allocations: 0 / 3.702 GB, free: 160.9 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.1714/13.05, allocations: 80.23 MB / 3.78 GB, free: 80.66 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 5
 * Number of states: 42 ($STATESET1.x[32],$STATESET1.x[31],$STATESET1.x[30],$STATESET1.x[29],$STATESET1.x[28],$STATESET1.x[27],$STATESET1.x[26],$STATESET1.x[25],$STATESET1.x[24],$STATESET1.x[23],$STATESET1.x[22],$STATESET1.x[21],$STATESET1.x[20],$STATESET1.x[19],$STATESET1.x[18],$STATESET1.x[17],$STATESET1.x[16],$STATESET1.x[15],$STATESET1.x[14],$STATESET1.x[13],$STATESET1.x[12],$STATESET1.x[11],$STATESET1.x[10],$STATESET1.x[9],$STATESET1.x[8],$STATESET1.x[7],$STATESET1.x[6],$STATESET1.x[5],$STATESET1.x[4],$STATESET1.x[3],$STATESET1.x[2],$STATESET1.x[1],pmpSouth.vol.dynBal.U,pmpNorth.vol.dynBal.U,valSouth.vol.dynBal.U,valNorth.vol.dynBal.U,spl.vol.dynBal.U,spl1.vol.dynBal.U,pumpHea.vol.dynBal.U,spl2.vol.dynBal.U,spl3.vol.dynBal.U,pumpCoo.vol.dynBal.U)
 * Number of discrete variables: 7 ($whenCondition2,$whenCondition1,stepPump.y,stepPump.pulseStart,pumpHea.stage,stepValve.T_start,stepValve.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (stepValve.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (541):
 * Single equations (assignments): 518
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 10
 * When equations: 3
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 6
 * Torn equation systems: 4
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Equation system details (not torn):
 * Constant Jacobian (size): 0 systems
 * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 0 systems
 * Non-linear Jacobian (size): 6 systems
   {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}
 * Without analytic Jacobian (size): 0 systems
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 1 system
   {(28,28,89.3%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 3 systems
   {(33,156), (1,1), (62,186)}
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.008536/13.06, allocations: 1.914 MB / 3.782 GB, free: 78.89 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.7032/13.76, allocations: 93.7 MB / 3.873 GB, free: 407.8 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.654e-05/13.76, allocations: 6.359 kB / 3.873 GB, free: 407.8 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.09095/13.85, allocations: 31.75 MB / 3.904 GB, free: 400.6 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.09069/13.94, allocations: 8.223 MB / 3.912 GB, free: 398.5 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1046/14.05, allocations: 58.78 MB / 3.97 GB, free: 370.8 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01822/14.06, allocations: 10.77 MB / 3.98 GB, free: 361.4 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.03861/14.1, allocations: 7.713 MB / 3.988 GB, free: 353.9 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01633/14.12, allocations: 2.58 MB / 3.99 GB, free: 351.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 2.094e-06/14.12, allocations: 0 / 3.99 GB, free: 351.3 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 2.758/16.88, allocations: 0.7614 GB / 4.752 GB, free: 388.4 MB / 1.076 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 643]
make -j1 -f IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.makefile [Timeout 660]
(rm -f IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; mkfifo IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe >> ../files/IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.sim & ./IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -lv LOG_STATS > IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 480]
[Calling os._exit(0), Time elapsed: 43.10909612849355]
Failed to read output from testmodel.py, exit status != 0:
16.88869816996157 16.903506607 14.770616227
Calling exit ...
<OMPython.OMCSessionZMQ object at 0x7f3ed6c757b0>