Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00131/0.00131, allocations: 104 kB / 16.45 MB, free: 6.449 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001343/0.001343, allocations: 210.4 kB / 19.43 MB, free: 3.637 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.429/1.429, allocations: 230.6 MB / 252.8 MB, free: 9.137 MB / 206.1 MB " [Timeout remaining time 178] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.1-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.1-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.632/2.632, allocations: 476.7 MB / 0.7672 GB, free: 5.219 MB / 0.6231 GB " [Timeout remaining time 177] Using package Buildings with version 11.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.1-maint.11.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) [Timeout 300] "Notification: Buildings requested package Modelica of version 4.0.0. Modelica 4.1.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed. Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001991/0.001991, allocations: 63.91 kB / 1.112 GB, free: 1.523 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.8669/0.8689, allocations: 169.9 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 13.44 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03588/0.9048, allocations: 32.16 MB / 1.31 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0196/0.9244, allocations: 12.4 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 0.7266 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002368/0.9268, allocations: 87.31 kB / 1.322 GB, free: 0.6406 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003155/0.9299, allocations: 1.119 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 15.52 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005982/0.9359, allocations: 2.183 MB / 1.325 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005475/0.9414, allocations: 1.873 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02249/0.9639, allocations: 19.61 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 7.82 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009416/0.9733, allocations: 6.299 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 1.441 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01269/0.986, allocations: 6.625 MB / 1.359 GB, free: 10.81 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01063/0.9966, allocations: 5.578 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 5.215 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002526/0.9991, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 4.465 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008696/1.008, allocations: 3.29 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 1.172 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004704/1.013, allocations: 3.057 MB / 1.371 GB, free: 14.11 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01101/1.024, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 9.328 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0245/1.048, allocations: 15.55 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 9.727 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.083e-06/1.048, allocations: 0 / 1.391 GB, free: 9.727 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.693e-06/1.048, allocations: 0 / 1.391 GB, free: 9.727 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005501/1.049, allocations: 0 / 1.391 GB, free: 9.727 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03623/1.085, allocations: 11.77 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.429e-05/1.085, allocations: 16.02 kB / 1.402 GB, free: 13.83 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001412/1.086, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.403 GB, free: 13.33 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003729/1.09, allocations: 0.9441 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 12.38 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0222/1.112, allocations: 9.707 MB / 1.413 GB, free: 2.605 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003484/1.113, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.414 GB, free: 2.277 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001527/1.114, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.414 GB, free: 1.805 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01074/1.125, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 11.61 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.927e-05/1.125, allocations: 11.89 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 11.59 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003972/1.125, allocations: 144 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 11.45 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000117/1.125, allocations: 107.9 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 11.35 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008121/1.134, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 6.578 MB / 1.123 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0647/1.198, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.137 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01297/1.211, allocations: 6.058 MB / 1.464 GB, free: 12.98 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004475/1.216, allocations: 2.427 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 10.55 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02905/1.245, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 12.76 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004128/1.249, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 10.6 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.891e-06/1.249, allocations: 0 / 1.481 GB, free: 10.6 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03357/1.282, allocations: 14.27 MB / 1.495 GB, free: 12.17 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001085/1.283, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.495 GB, free: 12.02 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02342/1.306, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 1.59 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00107/1.307, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.505 GB, free: 1.465 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005947/1.313, allocations: 3.329 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 14.12 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002303/1.315, allocations: 0.9182 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 13.19 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004178/1.319, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.511 GB, free: 11.97 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001337/1.32, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.511 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006301/1.326, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 8.207 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008551/1.334, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 1.07 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06881/1.403, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.556 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.96e-05/1.403, allocations: 24 kB / 1.556 GB, free: 10.95 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02176/1.425, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.566 GB, free: 0.7617 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001522/1.425, allocations: 70.7 kB / 1.566 GB, free: 0.6875 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001941/1.425, allocations: 84 kB / 1.566 GB, free: 0.6055 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0019/1.427, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.567 GB, free: 15.87 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.0055/1.433, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.568 GB, free: 14.39 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01502/1.448, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.582 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009386/1.457, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 13.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001338/1.459, allocations: 272 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 13.43 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01305/1.472, allocations: 7.094 MB / 1.591 GB, free: 6.328 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009251/1.481, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.597 GB, free: 15.19 MB / 1.311 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.7242/2.205, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.632 GB, free: 292.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.948e-05/2.205, allocations: 23.5 kB / 1.632 GB, free: 292.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01388/2.219, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.642 GB, free: 289.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.362e-05/2.219, allocations: 69.23 kB / 1.642 GB, free: 289.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001015/2.219, allocations: 85.33 kB / 1.642 GB, free: 289.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001315/2.221, allocations: 0.7092 MB / 1.643 GB, free: 289.1 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004271/2.225, allocations: 1.479 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 288.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008531/2.233, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.659 GB, free: 277 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008533/2.242, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.66 GB, free: 276.4 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009981/2.243, allocations: 276.6 kB / 1.66 GB, free: 276.4 MB / 1.311 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00124/2.244, allocations: 0.7567 MB / 1.661 GB, free: 275.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002063/2.246, allocations: 0.6925 MB / 1.661 GB, free: 275.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007141/2.253, allocations: 5.146 MB / 1.666 GB, free: 273 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.937e-05/2.253, allocations: 20 kB / 1.666 GB, free: 273 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.094e-05/2.253, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.666 GB, free: 273 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004298/2.258, allocations: 3.954 MB / 1.67 GB, free: 269 MB / 1.311 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01905/2.277, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.683 GB, free: 255.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.378e-06/2.277, allocations: 4 kB / 1.683 GB, free: 255.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002164/2.279, allocations: 0.6042 MB / 1.684 GB, free: 254.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001174/2.28, allocations: 0.5786 MB / 1.685 GB, free: 254.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002197/2.28, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.685 GB, free: 254.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007835/2.288, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.699 GB, free: 238.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.517e-06/2.288, allocations: 7.781 kB / 1.699 GB, free: 238.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009068/2.297, allocations: 7.151 MB / 1.706 GB, free: 232.1 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004916/2.302, allocations: 1.709 MB / 1.707 GB, free: 230.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002733/2.305, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.708 GB, free: 230.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007835/2.313, allocations: 0.6159 MB / 1.708 GB, free: 229.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006554/2.313, allocations: 163.8 kB / 1.708 GB, free: 229.4 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003045/2.314, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.708 GB, free: 229.4 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01678/2.33, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.716 GB, free: 222 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.51e-07/2.33, allocations: 1.641 kB / 1.716 GB, free: 222 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02121/2.352, allocations: 3.979 MB / 1.719 GB, free: 218.1 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01589/2.367, allocations: 8.208 MB / 1.727 GB, free: 209.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01927/2.387, allocations: 13.12 MB / 1.74 GB, free: 196.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.033e-05/2.387, allocations: 4 kB / 1.74 GB, free: 196.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003406/2.39, allocations: 2.958 MB / 1.743 GB, free: 193.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01238/2.403, allocations: 2.926 MB / 1.746 GB, free: 190.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1129/2.515, allocations: 80.02 MB / 1.824 GB, free: 107.3 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005115/2.521, allocations: 5.362 MB / 1.829 GB, free: 101.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01182/2.532, allocations: 6.438 MB / 1.836 GB, free: 95.52 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005132/2.538, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.839 GB, free: 92.53 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.252e-06/2.538, allocations: 0 / 1.839 GB, free: 92.53 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.3174/2.855, allocations: 203.2 MB / 2.037 GB, free: 2.957 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 25.17/28.02, allocations: 4 kB / 2.037 GB, free: 2.953 MB / 1.42 GB " [Timeout remaining time 272] (rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 400 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 420.0] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "Error: Could not read variable sla.sta_b.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.sta_b.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv failed! " [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 34.09465287695639]