Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr IBPSA_latest_IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001691/0.001691, allocations: 116.3 kB / 17.84 MB, free: 5.312 MB / 14.72 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001926/0.001926, allocations: 203.2 kB / 20.8 MB, free: 2.371 MB / 14.72 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.414/1.414, allocations: 230.6 MB / 254.2 MB, free: 15.05 MB / 206.1 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 178]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IBPSA master/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IBPSA master/package.mo): time 0.978/0.978, allocations: 150 MB / 460.2 MB, free: 5.238 MB / 350.1 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 179]
Using package IBPSA with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IBPSA master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,fileNamePrefix="IBPSA_latest_IBPSA_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic",fmuType="cs",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,fileNamePrefix="IBPSA_latest_IBPSA_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic",fmuType="cs",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) [Timeout 660]
"Notification: IBPSA requested package Modelica of version 4.0.0. Modelica 4.1.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed.
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001909/0.001909, allocations: 66.06 kB / 0.6368 GB, free: 30.58 MB / 0.4981 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.1546/0.1565, allocations: 89.14 MB / 0.7238 GB, free: 4.113 MB / 0.5294 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic): time 0.7709/0.9274, allocations: 361.7 MB / 1.077 GB, free: 13.25 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.1154/1.043, allocations: 75.91 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 1.16 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.01626/1.059, allocations: 0.6042 MB / 1.152 GB, free: 0.5508 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.0195/1.079, allocations: 6.587 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 9.93 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.04212/1.121, allocations: 14.67 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.02667/1.147, allocations: 10.38 MB / 1.183 GB, free: 0.918 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.5782/1.725, allocations: 55.26 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 46.61 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.02631/1.752, allocations: 17.04 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 45.75 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.04023/1.792, allocations: 17.71 MB / 1.271 GB, free: 44.96 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.0311/1.823, allocations: 16.36 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 42.83 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.009703/1.833, allocations: 1.903 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 42.83 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0217/1.855, allocations: 6.221 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 42.75 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.01141/1.866, allocations: 6.328 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 41.93 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.03/1.896, allocations: 10.92 MB / 1.311 GB, free: 39.12 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0503/1.946, allocations: 30.65 MB / 1.341 GB, free: 29.41 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.104e-06/1.946, allocations: 0 / 1.341 GB, free: 29.41 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.784e-06/1.946, allocations: 2.906 kB / 1.341 GB, free: 29.41 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.001147/1.947, allocations: 4 kB / 1.341 GB, free: 29.4 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 1949
 * Number of variables: 1949
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.06409/2.011, allocations: 21.16 MB / 1.362 GB, free: 12.56 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.069e-05/2.012, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.362 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputRealDerivatives (simulation): time 0.0001867/2.012, allocations: 199.2 kB / 1.362 GB, free: 12.36 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.005305/2.017, allocations: 1.002 MB / 1.363 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.01854/2.036, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 8.598 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.04902/2.085, allocations: 22.54 MB / 1.388 GB, free: 8.953 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.001006/2.086, allocations: 0.6535 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 8.578 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.006044/2.092, allocations: 0.9054 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 7.957 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.05034/2.142, allocations: 17.28 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 9.266 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000413/2.142, allocations: 17.56 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.005005/2.147, allocations: 327.9 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 8.941 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0002437/2.148, allocations: 202 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 8.746 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.04946/2.197, allocations: 21.51 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 3.273 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.1627/2.36, allocations: 80.45 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 0.6211 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.02953/2.389, allocations: 12.95 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 3.668 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.01996/2.409, allocations: 9.362 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 10.28 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.08161/2.491, allocations: 34.17 MB / 1.562 GB, free: 7.762 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.02285/2.514, allocations: 10.81 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 12.88 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyInStream (simulation): time 0.03184/2.546, allocations: 8.241 MB / 1.581 GB, free: 4.84 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=548): time 3.57e-05/2.546, allocations: 0 / 1.581 GB, free: 4.84 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=832): time 1.702/4.247, allocations: 248.9 MB / 1.824 GB, free: 392 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : valCoo.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[2].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow = 0.0
2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0
[
  -1.0 , -1.0 ;
  1.0 , 1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[2].m_flow
]
  =
[
  tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + (-spl1.res1.m_flow) - valCoo.m_flow - valNorth.res3.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ;
  pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0
2 : valCoo.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[2].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow = 0.0
[
  1.0 , 1.0 ;
  -1.0 , -1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[1].m_flow
]
  =
[
  pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + (-spl1.res1.m_flow) - valCoo.m_flow - valNorth.res3.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0
2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0
[
  -1.0 , -1.0 ;
  1.0 , 1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ;
  tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0
]
  =
[
  tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + (-spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0) - valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ;
  pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.1094/4.357, allocations: 52.71 MB / 1.875 GB, free: 337.9 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03269/4.39, allocations: 19.65 MB / 1.894 GB, free: 318.4 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.004439/4.394, allocations: 217.7 kB / 1.895 GB, free: 318.2 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.008138/4.402, allocations: 7.507 MB / 1.902 GB, free: 311.1 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.01047/4.413, allocations: 3.132 MB / 1.905 GB, free: 308.4 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.01498/4.428, allocations: 4.39 MB / 1.909 GB, free: 304 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.814e-05/4.428, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.909 GB, free: 303.7 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0341/4.462, allocations: 25.06 MB / 1.934 GB, free: 278.6 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.03632/4.498, allocations: 27.89 MB / 1.961 GB, free: 249.7 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06571/4.564, allocations: 45.96 MB / 2.006 GB, free: 203 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.185e-05/4.564, allocations: 16 kB / 2.006 GB, free: 203 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=1548) (initialization): time 0.6046/5.168, allocations: 145.7 MB / 2.148 GB, free: 57.34 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.737e-05/5.168, allocations: 53.69 kB / 2.148 GB, free: 57.29 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.092e-05/5.169, allocations: 47.94 kB / 2.148 GB, free: 57.24 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 1.018/6.187, allocations: 125.4 MB / 2.271 GB, free: 494 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.01733/6.204, allocations: 3.225 MB / 2.274 GB, free: 492.8 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.1522/6.356, allocations: 86.9 MB / 2.359 GB, free: 419.5 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.2082/6.564, allocations: 10.73 MB / 2.369 GB, free: 408.8 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00726/6.572, allocations: 1.648 MB / 2.371 GB, free: 407.1 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04379/6.615, allocations: 28.09 MB / 2.398 GB, free: 379 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.03388/6.649, allocations: 27.27 MB / 2.425 GB, free: 350.7 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06243/6.712, allocations: 44.71 MB / 2.469 GB, free: 305.3 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.033e-05/6.712, allocations: 12 kB / 2.469 GB, free: 305.3 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=1548) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.6076/7.319, allocations: 143.5 MB / 2.609 GB, free: 162.7 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.879e-05/7.319, allocations: 53.64 kB / 2.609 GB, free: 162.6 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 6.674e-05/7.32, allocations: 48.09 kB / 2.609 GB, free: 162.6 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.5729/7.892, allocations: 124.1 MB / 2.73 GB, free: 38.86 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.01615/7.909, allocations: 3.18 MB / 2.733 GB, free: 35.68 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.589/8.498, allocations: 93.92 MB / 2.825 GB, free: 472.9 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.2071/8.705, allocations: 10.79 MB / 2.836 GB, free: 472.7 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.007273/8.712, allocations: 1.612 MB / 2.837 GB, free: 472.6 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 203
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 10 ($whenCondition1,stepValve.count,$PRE.stepValve.count,stepValve.T_start,$PRE.stepValve.T_start,pumpHea.stage,stepPump.pulseStart,$PRE.stepPump.pulseStart,stepPump.y,$whenCondition2)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (964):
 * Single equations (assignments): 942
 * Array equations: 6
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 4
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 8
 * Torn equation systems: 3
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Equation system details (not torn):
 * Constant Jacobian (size): 0 systems
 * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 0 systems
 * Non-linear Jacobian (size): 8 systems
   {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}
 * Without analytic Jacobian (size): 0 systems
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 1 system
   {(28,28,89.3%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 2 systems
   {(33,119), (33,119)}
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.008367/8.72, allocations: 0.7258 MB / 2.838 GB, free: 472.1 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.008329/8.729, allocations: 1.636 MB / 2.839 GB, free: 472.1 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.225/8.954, allocations: 69.71 MB / 2.908 GB, free: 423.9 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.2287/9.182, allocations: 80.86 MB / 2.987 GB, free: 343.2 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 0.0001866/9.183, allocations: 28 kB / 2.987 GB, free: 343.2 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.219/9.402, allocations: 79.73 MB / 3.064 GB, free: 263.5 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.359/9.761, allocations: 207.7 MB / 3.267 GB, free: 55.95 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.523e-05/9.761, allocations: 0 / 3.267 GB, free: 55.95 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01251/9.773, allocations: 2.3 MB / 3.269 GB, free: 53.65 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.9537/10.73, allocations: 142.1 MB / 3.408 GB, free: 453.1 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.005709/10.73, allocations: 0.7889 MB / 3.409 GB, free: 452.6 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.1287/10.86, allocations: 71.74 MB / 3.479 GB, free: 397.9 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[4].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
2 : tabsSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[8].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
3 : valSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[8].port_b.p
4 : valSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[4].port_b.p
[
  -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 ;
  0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ;
  0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 ;
  1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0
]
  *
[
  valSouth2[4].port_b.p ;
  valSouth2[2].port_a.p ;
  valSouth2[8].port_b.p ;
  tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
]
  =
[
  -tabsSouth2[4].dp ;
  -tabsSouth2[8].dp ;
  -valSouth2[8].dp ;
  -valSouth2[4].dp
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0
2 : spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsNorth2[7].m_flow) - $cse422 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[2].m_flow = 0.0
[
  1.0 , 1.0 ;
  -1.0 , -1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[2].m_flow
]
  =
[
  pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ;
  tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + $cse422 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - spl1.res1.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : valSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[8].port_b.p
2 : valSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[4].port_b.p
3 : tabsSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[4].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
4 : tabsSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[8].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p
[
  1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ;
  0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 ;
  0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ;
  -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0
]
  *
[
  valSouth2[8].port_b.p ;
  tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p ;
  valSouth2[4].port_b.p ;
  valSouth2[2].port_a.p
]
  =
[
  -valSouth2[8].dp ;
  -valSouth2[4].dp ;
  -tabsSouth2[4].dp ;
  -tabsSouth2[8].dp
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2[2].port_a.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsNorth2[7].m_flow) - $cse422 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[2].m_flow = 0.0
2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0
[
  -1.0 , -1.0 ;
  1.0 , 1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ;
  tabsSouth1[2].m_flow
]
  =
[
  tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + $cse422 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - spl1.res1.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ;
  pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
2 : valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
3 : valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
4 : tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
[
  1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ;
  0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ;
  0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ;
  1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
  =
[
  -tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = 0.0
2 : spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 = 0.0
[
  1.0 , 1.0 ;
  -1.0 , -1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
  =
[
  pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 ;
  tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
2 : valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
3 : valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
4 : tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
[
  1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ;
  0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ;
  0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ;
  1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
  =
[
  -tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  -tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Warning: The linear system: 
1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = 0.0
2 : spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 = 0.0
[
  1.0 , 1.0 ;
  -1.0 , -1.0
]
  *
[
  tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ;
  tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
  =
[
  pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 ;
  tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29
]
 might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway.
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 0.08327/10.94, allocations: 49.77 MB / 3.528 GB, free: 347.4 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.2753/11.22, allocations: 117.8 MB / 3.643 GB, free: 230.6 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.02383/11.24, allocations: 7.225 MB / 3.65 GB, free: 224.3 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.009337/11.25, allocations: 186.8 kB / 3.65 GB, free: 224.1 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.1094/11.36, allocations: 5.338 MB / 3.655 GB, free: 218.8 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.00625/11.37, allocations: 1.107 MB / 3.656 GB, free: 217.6 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.004318/11.37, allocations: 0.8728 MB / 3.657 GB, free: 216.8 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02284/11.4, allocations: 13.7 MB / 3.671 GB, free: 203.1 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.61e-07/11.4, allocations: 0 / 3.671 GB, free: 203.1 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.1665/11.56, allocations: 80.27 MB / 3.749 GB, free: 123 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 5
 * Number of states: 42 ($STATESET1.x[32],$STATESET1.x[31],$STATESET1.x[30],$STATESET1.x[29],$STATESET1.x[28],$STATESET1.x[27],$STATESET1.x[26],$STATESET1.x[25],$STATESET1.x[24],$STATESET1.x[23],$STATESET1.x[22],$STATESET1.x[21],$STATESET1.x[20],$STATESET1.x[19],$STATESET1.x[18],$STATESET1.x[17],$STATESET1.x[16],$STATESET1.x[15],$STATESET1.x[14],$STATESET1.x[13],$STATESET1.x[12],$STATESET1.x[11],$STATESET1.x[10],$STATESET1.x[9],$STATESET1.x[8],$STATESET1.x[7],$STATESET1.x[6],$STATESET1.x[5],$STATESET1.x[4],$STATESET1.x[3],$STATESET1.x[2],$STATESET1.x[1],pmpSouth.vol.dynBal.U,pmpNorth.vol.dynBal.U,valSouth.vol.dynBal.U,valNorth.vol.dynBal.U,spl.vol.dynBal.U,spl1.vol.dynBal.U,pumpHea.vol.dynBal.U,spl2.vol.dynBal.U,spl3.vol.dynBal.U,pumpCoo.vol.dynBal.U)
 * Number of discrete variables: 7 ($whenCondition2,$whenCondition1,stepPump.y,stepPump.pulseStart,pumpHea.stage,stepValve.T_start,stepValve.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (stepValve.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (541):
 * Single equations (assignments): 518
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 10
 * When equations: 3
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 6
 * Torn equation systems: 4
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Equation system details (not torn):
 * Constant Jacobian (size): 0 systems
 * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 0 systems
 * Non-linear Jacobian (size): 6 systems
   {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}
 * Without analytic Jacobian (size): 0 systems
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 1 system
   {(28,28,89.3%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 3 systems
   {(33,156), (1,1), (62,186)}
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.6702/12.23, allocations: 118.7 MB / 3.865 GB, free: 0.5029 GB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.1689/12.4, allocations: 93.66 MB / 3.956 GB, free: 492.9 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.156e-05/12.4, allocations: 4 kB / 3.956 GB, free: 492.9 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.07524/12.48, allocations: 31.74 MB / 3.987 GB, free: 462.8 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.07745/12.55, allocations: 8.248 MB / 3.995 GB, free: 455.2 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 1.965/14.52, allocations: 483 MB / 4.467 GB, free: 460.8 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01496/14.53, allocations: 10.82 MB / 4.478 GB, free: 459.5 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.02985/14.56, allocations: 7.763 MB / 4.485 GB, free: 459.2 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.02509/14.59, allocations: 11.63 MB / 4.497 GB, free: 458.2 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.282e-06/14.59, allocations: 0 / 4.497 GB, free: 458.2 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 1.641/16.23, allocations: 0.9217 GB / 5.418 GB, free: 92.61 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 117/133.2, allocations: 4.062 kB / 5.418 GB, free: 92.61 MB / 1.139 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 526]
(rm -f IBPSA_latest_IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; mkfifo IBPSA_latest_IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < IBPSA_latest_IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe >> ../files/IBPSA_latest_IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator  --tempDir=temp_IBPSA_latest_IBPSA_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=1000 --stepSize=0.4 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 IBPSA_latest_IBPSA_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic.fmu > IBPSA_latest_IBPSA.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 52.5]
[Calling os._exit(0), Time elapsed: 141.7723751339945]
Failed to read output from testmodel.py, exit status != 0:
133.74877655802993 133.767527814 131.81742045
Calling exit ...
<OMPython.OMCSessionZMQ object at 0x7f866e3eb3a0>