Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.005162/0.005162, allocations: 100.1 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.008 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001222/0.001222, allocations: 193.6 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.93 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.32/1.32, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.14 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.243/2.243, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 0.6484 MB / 0.5294 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001243/0.001243, allocations: 71.89 kB / 0.9509 GB, free: 7.598 MB / 0.7325 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.8411/0.8423, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.088 GB, free: 5.5 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03438/0.8768, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02421/0.901, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 6.074 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003538/0.9046, allocations: 68.34 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 6.047 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003555/0.9082, allocations: 1.096 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 5.465 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006627/0.9149, allocations: 2.086 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 4.25 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00585/0.9207, allocations: 1.864 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02222/0.943, allocations: 19.56 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.0137/0.9567, allocations: 7.187 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 7.82 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01457/0.9713, allocations: 6.464 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 4.535 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01151/0.9829, allocations: 5.341 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.324 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002972/0.9859, allocations: 0.7493 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.324 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01061/0.9965, allocations: 3.228 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 15.85 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006848/1.003, allocations: 2.996 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 13.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01733/1.021, allocations: 4.751 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 10.55 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0253/1.046, allocations: 15.44 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.987e-06/1.046, allocations: 3.984 kB / 1.2 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.813e-06/1.046, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004606/1.047, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03139/1.078, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.415e-05/1.078, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003735/1.082, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 14.57 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0245/1.106, allocations: 9.624 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.867 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004093/1.107, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.543 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002547/1.109, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.066 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01587/1.125, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.88 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001649/1.125, allocations: 19.92 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.86 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001147/1.127, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.71 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001265/1.127, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.62 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009633/1.136, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 8.844 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06488/1.201, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 5.434 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01278/1.214, allocations: 6.241 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00424/1.218, allocations: 2.552 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02852/1.247, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.76 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003757/1.251, allocations: 2.13 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.801e-06/1.251, allocations: 0 / 1.29 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03094/1.282, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 14.4 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.316e-05/1.282, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02308/1.305, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.824 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001337/1.306, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.699 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005533/1.312, allocations: 3.297 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 388 kB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002132/1.314, allocations: 0.8746 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 15.49 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003577/1.318, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 14.28 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.563e-05/1.318, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005378/1.323, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 10.51 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006989/1.33, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.367 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06169/1.392, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 13.29 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.234e-05/1.392, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 13.27 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02131/1.413, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 3.098 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001069/1.413, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 3.027 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001258/1.414, allocations: 88.81 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.941 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001716/1.415, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.207 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005459/1.421, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 0.7227 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01199/1.433, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 1.227 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009782/1.443, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 44 kB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001213/1.444, allocations: 280.1 kB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.77 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01184/1.456, allocations: 7.088 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 8.664 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007595/1.463, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 1.527 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05888/1.522, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 11.51 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.881e-05/1.522, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 11.48 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0191/1.541, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 1.324 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001405/1.542, allocations: 74.28 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 1.246 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001612/1.542, allocations: 88 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 1.16 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001934/1.544, allocations: 0.7083 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 440 kB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005817/1.55, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01199/1.562, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 15.45 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0126/1.574, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001915/1.576, allocations: 280.4 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 14 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003006/1.579, allocations: 0.7571 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.23 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002985/1.582, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01046/1.593, allocations: 5.148 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.375 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.69e-05/1.593, allocations: 28 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.348 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.118e-05/1.593, allocations: 4 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.344 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005504/1.598, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 3.344 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02819/1.626, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.695 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.475e-05/1.626, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.691 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002582/1.629, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.086 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001593/1.631, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.488 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003212/1.631, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.355 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01154/1.643, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.992 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.231e-06/1.643, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.984 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01185/1.654, allocations: 7.118 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 13.78 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005907/1.66, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002463/1.663, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.96 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005975/1.669, allocations: 0.616 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.35 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.000589/1.67, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.18 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.00025/1.67, allocations: 80.33 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01567/1.685, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.781 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7.11e-07/1.686, allocations: 0 / 1.524 GB, free: 3.781 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0215/1.707, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002651/1.71, allocations: 0.5948 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.23 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02304/1.733, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.541 GB, free: 1.609 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.15e-05/1.733, allocations: 0 / 1.541 GB, free: 1.609 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005269/1.738, allocations: 3.055 MB / 1.544 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0199/1.758, allocations: 2.94 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 11.56 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03975/1.798, allocations: 18.76 MB / 1.565 GB, free: 8.738 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007668/1.806, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 3.328 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.6394/2.445, allocations: 6.421 MB / 1.577 GB, free: 405.9 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003625/2.449, allocations: 428.1 kB / 1.577 GB, free: 405.9 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.61e-07/2.449, allocations: 0 / 1.577 GB, free: 405.9 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1956/2.644, allocations: 137.7 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 333.8 MB / 1.311 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches