Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.004349/0.004349, allocations: 97.98 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.055 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001276/0.001276, allocations: 192.3 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.969 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.25/1.25, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.172 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.51/2.51, allocations: 482.6 MB / 0.755 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 0.6075 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001669/0.001669, allocations: 67.89 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 12.21 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2549/0.2566, allocations: 162.3 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 9.809 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.4898/0.7465, allocations: 31.79 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0163/0.7628, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.285 GB, free: 3.926 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001497/0.7643, allocations: 64.75 kB / 1.285 GB, free: 3.902 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002416/0.7668, allocations: 1.108 MB / 1.286 GB, free: 3.309 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004153/0.7709, allocations: 2.079 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 2.094 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004176/0.7751, allocations: 1.86 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 1.18 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.0186/0.7937, allocations: 19.58 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 8.945 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008967/0.8027, allocations: 7.188 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 6.254 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01097/0.8137, allocations: 6.544 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 3.77 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008781/0.8225, allocations: 5.339 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 1.512 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001367/0.8239, allocations: 0.7482 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 1.512 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00638/0.8303, allocations: 3.219 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 0.7422 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003032/0.8333, allocations: 2.995 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 14.97 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.006084/0.8394, allocations: 4.755 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 11.75 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01653/0.8559, allocations: 15.5 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 1.664 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.328e-06/0.856, allocations: 0 / 1.354 GB, free: 1.664 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.372e-06/0.856, allocations: 1.406 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 1.664 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002313/0.8562, allocations: 0 / 1.354 GB, free: 1.664 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02273/0.8789, allocations: 11.74 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 8.605 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.048e-05/0.879, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.366 GB, free: 8.594 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0007244/0.8797, allocations: 0.4964 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 8.086 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002006/0.8817, allocations: 0.9209 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 7.16 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01608/0.8978, allocations: 9.679 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 13.41 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002323/0.8981, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 13.08 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0007555/0.8988, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.00855/0.9074, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 6.41 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.934e-05/0.9075, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 6.398 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003536/0.9078, allocations: 148 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 6.254 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.776e-05/0.9079, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 6.156 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.00666/0.9146, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.388 GB, free: 1.383 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0451/0.9597, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 13.92 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01038/0.9701, allocations: 6.236 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 7.586 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003475/0.9736, allocations: 2.548 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 5.031 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.01954/0.9931, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 7.242 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002843/0.996, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 5.082 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.216e-06/0.996, allocations: 0 / 1.445 GB, free: 5.082 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02076/1.017, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.459 GB, free: 6.641 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.8e-05/1.017, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.459 GB, free: 6.484 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01472/1.032, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 12.06 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0005446/1.032, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 11.94 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003461/1.036, allocations: 3.349 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 8.574 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.0014/1.037, allocations: 0.9104 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 7.656 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00174/1.039, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 6.438 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001179/1.039, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 6.133 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004724/1.044, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 2.668 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006347/1.05, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 11.53 MB / 1.186 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05111/1.101, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 5.43 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.008e-05/1.101, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 5.406 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01521/1.116, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 11.22 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.724e-05/1.116, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.896e-05/1.117, allocations: 84 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001478/1.118, allocations: 0.7128 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 10.33 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004317/1.122, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 8.848 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01208/1.135, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 9.336 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007616/1.142, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 8.16 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.000482/1.143, allocations: 272 kB / 1.547 GB, free: 7.895 MB / 1.248 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009797/1.152, allocations: 7.087 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 0.7969 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006486/1.159, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 9.66 MB / 1.264 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0508/1.21, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 3.621 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.565e-05/1.21, allocations: 24 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 3.598 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01498/1.225, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.606 GB, free: 9.414 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.42e-05/1.225, allocations: 66.64 kB / 1.606 GB, free: 9.344 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.901e-05/1.225, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.606 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001352/1.226, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 8.52 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004282/1.231, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 7.039 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01195/1.243, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.622 GB, free: 7.543 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007559/1.25, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.623 GB, free: 6.355 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0005028/1.251, allocations: 280.1 kB / 1.624 GB, free: 6.082 MB / 1.326 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001176/1.252, allocations: 0.7532 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 5.316 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001615/1.253, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.625 GB, free: 4.613 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008238/1.262, allocations: 5.149 MB / 1.63 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.033e-05/1.262, allocations: 24 kB / 1.63 GB, free: 15.4 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.004e-05/1.262, allocations: 4 kB / 1.63 GB, free: 15.4 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005516/1.267, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 11.4 MB / 1.342 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02113/1.288, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 13.76 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.867e-06/1.288, allocations: 4 kB / 1.647 GB, free: 13.76 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002294/1.291, allocations: 0.6007 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001164/1.292, allocations: 0.5757 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 12.56 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002684/1.292, allocations: 151.8 kB / 1.648 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0117/1.304, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.662 GB, free: 13.03 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.877e-06/1.304, allocations: 8.062 kB / 1.662 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009706/1.314, allocations: 7.149 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 5.793 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003259/1.317, allocations: 1.707 MB / 1.671 GB, free: 4.062 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00125/1.318, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.671 GB, free: 3.941 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004024/1.322, allocations: 0.6125 MB / 1.672 GB, free: 3.328 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003653/1.323, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.672 GB, free: 3.16 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001979/1.323, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.672 GB, free: 3.078 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01109/1.334, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.679 GB, free: 11.75 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.61e-07/1.334, allocations: 0 / 1.679 GB, free: 11.75 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0103/1.344, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.683 GB, free: 7.777 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01102/1.355, allocations: 8.226 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 15.47 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01793/1.373, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.704 GB, free: 1.84 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 4.168e-06/1.373, allocations: 0 / 1.704 GB, free: 1.84 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.00396/1.377, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.707 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 1.42 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01042/1.388, allocations: 2.928 MB / 1.71 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 1.42 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1121/1.5, allocations: 80.02 MB / 1.788 GB, free: 8.387 MB / 1.498 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006776/1.506, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.793 GB, free: 2.977 MB / 1.498 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01218/1.519, allocations: 6.435 MB / 1.8 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 1.514 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004883/1.524, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.803 GB, free: 9.574 MB / 1.514 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 5.51e-07/1.524, allocations: 0 / 1.803 GB, free: 9.574 MB / 1.514 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 9.594/11.12, allocations: 201.9 MB / 2 GB, free: 402.7 MB / 1.529 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 33.98/45.1, allocations: 14.12 kB / 2 GB, free: 402.7 MB / 1.529 GB
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=400 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)