Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007037/0.007037, allocations: 101.4 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 5.953 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001679/0.001679, allocations: 192.2 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.883 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.266/1.266, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.156 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.14/2.14, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 172 kB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001146/0.001147, allocations: 67.61 kB / 0.9504 GB, free: 5.871 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.226/0.2271, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 1.984 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02801/0.2552, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.118 GB, free: 2.117 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01685/0.2721, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 5.797 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00189/0.274, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.734 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002936/0.277, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 4.621 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005045/0.2821, allocations: 2.082 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004669/0.2867, allocations: 1.864 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 0.6758 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01831/0.3051, allocations: 19.56 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008674/0.3138, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 5.805 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01071/0.3245, allocations: 6.462 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008633/0.3332, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 9.969 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002473/0.3357, allocations: 0.7499 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.219 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007396/0.3431, allocations: 3.219 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 5.996 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004474/0.3476, allocations: 3 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.988 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008039/0.3557, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 14.21 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01705/0.3728, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 14.74 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.584e-06/0.3728, allocations: 3.984 kB / 1.2 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.493e-06/0.3728, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003401/0.3732, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0266/0.3998, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 3.137 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.315e-05/0.3998, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 3.125 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001229/0.4011, allocations: 0.4884 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 2.625 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003026/0.4041, allocations: 0.8764 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 1.738 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02041/0.4245, allocations: 9.615 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 8.047 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003507/0.4249, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 7.719 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001407/0.4263, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 7.242 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009969/0.4363, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 1.055 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.869e-05/0.4364, allocations: 19.75 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 1.035 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003853/0.4368, allocations: 152 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 0.8867 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.725e-05/0.4369, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 0.793 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.00782/0.4448, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 12.02 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.5019/0.9467, allocations: 33.75 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 141 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01177/0.9585, allocations: 6.233 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 139.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003676/0.9622, allocations: 2.548 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 139.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0214/0.9836, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 133.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002484/0.9861, allocations: 2.139 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 132.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.657e-06/0.9862, allocations: 0 / 1.29 GB, free: 132.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0206/1.007, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 125.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 4.913e-05/1.007, allocations: 128.6 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 125.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01252/1.019, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 120.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007428/1.02, allocations: 116 kB / 1.314 GB, free: 120.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.002453/1.023, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 117.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001275/1.024, allocations: 0.8673 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 116.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001354/1.025, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 116.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.463e-05/1.025, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 116 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.003511/1.029, allocations: 3.454 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 114.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.004056/1.033, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 108.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04002/1.073, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 70.39 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.733e-05/1.073, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 70.36 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01277/1.086, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 60.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.242e-05/1.086, allocations: 66.64 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 60.13 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.559e-05/1.086, allocations: 84 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 60.05 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00132/1.087, allocations: 0.7097 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 59.32 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004246/1.092, allocations: 1.484 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 57.83 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007818/1.099, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 42.36 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008201/1.108, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 41.19 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001069/1.109, allocations: 280 kB / 1.392 GB, free: 40.91 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008919/1.118, allocations: 7.092 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 33.82 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.004465/1.122, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 26.68 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04327/1.165, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 4.672 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.486e-05/1.165, allocations: 25.2 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 4.648 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01743/1.183, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.48 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.28e-05/1.183, allocations: 75.52 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.41 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001/1.183, allocations: 84 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001497/1.185, allocations: 0.7106 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 9.594 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00505/1.19, allocations: 1.479 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 8.113 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01152/1.201, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 8.641 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009152/1.21, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 7.453 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001246/1.212, allocations: 279.8 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 7.184 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001651/1.213, allocations: 0.7654 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 6.402 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00292/1.216, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 5.734 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008778/1.225, allocations: 5.15 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 0.5508 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.853e-05/1.225, allocations: 27.92 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 0.5234 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.142e-05/1.225, allocations: 8 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 0.5156 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005165/1.23, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 12.52 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02493/1.255, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.083e-05/1.255, allocations: 4 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002379/1.258, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 14.33 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001412/1.259, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002793/1.259, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 13.6 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01154/1.271, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 14.25 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 7.494e-06/1.271, allocations: 12.02 kB / 1.507 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01128/1.282, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 7.035 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005407/1.288, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 5.34 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002364/1.29, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 5.219 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00541/1.296, allocations: 0.6245 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 4.594 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004426/1.296, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 4.426 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002138/1.296, allocations: 79.95 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 4.348 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01325/1.309, allocations: 7.336 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.61e-07/1.31, allocations: 0 / 1.524 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01575/1.325, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 9.09 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01214/1.337, allocations: 8.186 MB / 1.536 GB, free: 0.8789 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01921/1.357, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 3.273 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.796e-06/1.357, allocations: 0 / 1.549 GB, free: 3.273 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004338/1.361, allocations: 3.046 MB / 1.552 GB, free: 148 kB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01507/1.376, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 13.25 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1247/1.501, allocations: 79.76 MB / 1.632 GB, free: 10.15 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00609/1.507, allocations: 5.377 MB / 1.638 GB, free: 4.738 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01313/1.52, allocations: 6.424 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 14.32 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006347/1.527, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 11.35 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.51e-07/1.527, allocations: 0 / 1.647 GB, free: 11.35 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 1.723/3.25, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.844 GB, free: 441.9 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 27.15/30.4, allocations: 11.05 kB / 1.844 GB, free: 441.8 MB / 1.357 GB
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)