Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.006476/0.006476, allocations: 101.6 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 5.996 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001732/0.001732, allocations: 190.3 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.93 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.322/1.322, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.312 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.679/2.679, allocations: 469.8 MB / 0.7425 GB, free: 7.324 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002038/0.002038, allocations: 67.89 kB / 1.065 GB, free: 13.5 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.324/0.326, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 14.25 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.6401/0.9661, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 4.891 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0152/0.9814, allocations: 12.3 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 4.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001986/0.9834, allocations: 59.34 kB / 1.263 GB, free: 4.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002677/0.9861, allocations: 1.106 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 4.516 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004757/0.9909, allocations: 2.088 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 3.98 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004647/0.9955, allocations: 1.86 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 3.762 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02005/1.016, allocations: 19.56 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 14.42 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01098/1.027, allocations: 7.202 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 11.81 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01352/1.04, allocations: 6.465 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.562 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01056/1.051, allocations: 5.347 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 7.562 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003276/1.054, allocations: 0.749 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.562 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0112/1.065, allocations: 3.222 MB / 1.31 GB, free: 6.883 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006132/1.071, allocations: 2.998 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 5.574 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01255/1.084, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 2.645 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02606/1.11, allocations: 15.49 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 10.1 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.282e-06/1.11, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 10.1 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.733e-06/1.11, allocations: 1.375 kB / 1.332 GB, free: 10.1 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005384/1.111, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 10.1 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03969/1.15, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.75 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.584e-05/1.15, allocations: 8.344 kB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.75 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002309/1.153, allocations: 0.4917 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.398 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00563/1.158, allocations: 0.9207 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 1.914 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02499/1.183, allocations: 9.685 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 10.16 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004081/1.184, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 9.828 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002623/1.186, allocations: 479.9 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 9.359 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01584/1.202, allocations: 5.955 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 3.172 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000176/1.203, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 3.16 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001491/1.204, allocations: 147.8 kB / 1.362 GB, free: 3.02 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001378/1.204, allocations: 104 kB / 1.362 GB, free: 2.918 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01033/1.215, allocations: 4.763 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 14.14 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0678/1.282, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 10.84 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01334/1.296, allocations: 6.229 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 4.559 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004719/1.301, allocations: 2.548 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 2.012 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03024/1.331, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 4.281 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004027/1.335, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 2.121 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.031e-06/1.335, allocations: 0 / 1.423 GB, free: 2.121 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03631/1.371, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.684 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.576e-05/1.371, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.531 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02022/1.392, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 9.105 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001026/1.393, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 8.98 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004309/1.397, allocations: 3.342 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 5.648 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001919/1.399, allocations: 0.9128 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 4.746 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002073/1.401, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 3.527 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.000118/1.401, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.453 GB, free: 3.223 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005001/1.406, allocations: 3.445 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 15.76 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006931/1.413, allocations: 5.94 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 8.617 MB / 1.154 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05454/1.468, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.406e-05/1.468, allocations: 24 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 2.508 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01693/1.485, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 8.32 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.905e-05/1.485, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 8.246 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.213e-05/1.485, allocations: 84 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 8.164 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001559/1.486, allocations: 0.7128 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 7.43 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004597/1.491, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 5.945 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01242/1.503, allocations: 14.54 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 6.434 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008572/1.512, allocations: 1.17 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 5.262 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0006607/1.513, allocations: 280 kB / 1.526 GB, free: 4.988 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01064/1.523, allocations: 7.085 MB / 1.533 GB, free: 13.89 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006593/1.53, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.538 GB, free: 6.762 MB / 1.232 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05244/1.582, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.574 GB, free: 0.7344 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.545e-05/1.582, allocations: 24 kB / 1.574 GB, free: 0.7109 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01724/1.6, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.523 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.566e-05/1.6, allocations: 66.67 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.453 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.807e-05/1.6, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.367 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001518/1.601, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.585 GB, free: 5.629 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004583/1.606, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.586 GB, free: 4.145 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01224/1.618, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.6 GB, free: 4.66 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008695/1.627, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.602 GB, free: 3.469 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0007297/1.628, allocations: 272.1 kB / 1.602 GB, free: 3.203 MB / 1.295 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001405/1.629, allocations: 0.7578 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 2.434 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001665/1.631, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 1.73 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008524/1.639, allocations: 5.145 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.926e-05/1.639, allocations: 27.92 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.613e-05/1.639, allocations: 4 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.52 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005597/1.645, allocations: 3.974 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 8.512 MB / 1.311 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0216/1.667, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.625 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.477e-06/1.667, allocations: 4 kB / 1.625 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002385/1.669, allocations: 0.6048 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001198/1.67, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 9.723 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000259/1.671, allocations: 143.8 kB / 1.627 GB, free: 9.582 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01209/1.683, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.641 GB, free: 10.22 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.158e-06/1.683, allocations: 4 kB / 1.641 GB, free: 10.21 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01041/1.693, allocations: 7.151 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 2.977 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003296/1.696, allocations: 1.711 MB / 1.649 GB, free: 1.242 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0008309/1.697, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.649 GB, free: 1.121 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003683/1.701, allocations: 0.6164 MB / 1.65 GB, free: 0.5039 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003726/1.701, allocations: 169.6 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 344 kB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001909/1.701, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 260 kB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01097/1.712, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 8.926 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.6e-07/1.712, allocations: 0 / 1.657 GB, free: 8.926 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01047/1.723, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.661 GB, free: 4.957 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01135/1.734, allocations: 8.216 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 12.68 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01889/1.753, allocations: 13.45 MB / 1.682 GB, free: 15.06 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 4.678e-06/1.753, allocations: 0 / 1.682 GB, free: 15.06 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004107/1.757, allocations: 3.051 MB / 1.685 GB, free: 11.92 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01212/1.769, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.688 GB, free: 9.027 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1169/1.886, allocations: 80.02 MB / 1.766 GB, free: 5.625 MB / 1.467 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00588/1.892, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.772 GB, free: 216 kB / 1.467 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01228/1.905, allocations: 6.439 MB / 1.778 GB, free: 9.781 MB / 1.482 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004475/1.909, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.781 GB, free: 6.805 MB / 1.482 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 5.51e-07/1.909, allocations: 0 / 1.781 GB, free: 6.805 MB / 1.482 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 4.025/5.934, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.978 GB, free: 413.7 MB / 1.514 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 29.98/35.91, allocations: 9.141 kB / 1.978 GB, free: 413.7 MB / 1.514 GB
(rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=400 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)