Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.005938/0.005938, allocations: 104 kB / 15.74 MB, free: 6.02 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001669/0.001669, allocations: 193.2 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.938 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.345/1.345, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.06 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.476/2.476, allocations: 469.8 MB / 0.7425 GB, free: 3.336 MB / 0.6075 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001711/0.001711, allocations: 71.91 kB / 1.065 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.7084/0.7101, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 2.008 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03419/0.7444, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 2.137 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01846/0.7629, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 5.816 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002137/0.7651, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.263 GB, free: 5.758 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003445/0.7685, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 4.645 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006048/0.7746, allocations: 2.089 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 2.547 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005353/0.78, allocations: 1.874 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 0.6797 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.026/0.806, allocations: 19.56 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 13.09 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01166/0.8177, allocations: 7.181 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 5.824 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01293/0.8307, allocations: 6.466 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 15.36 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01003/0.8408, allocations: 5.344 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 9.992 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002947/0.8437, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 9.242 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008987/0.8527, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.31 GB, free: 6.012 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005295/0.8581, allocations: 2.996 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 3.008 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01008/0.8682, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 14.23 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0235/0.8917, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.901e-06/0.8917, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.244e-06/0.8917, allocations: 4 kB / 1.332 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000469/0.8922, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03549/0.9277, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.836 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.018e-05/0.9278, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.824 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001906/0.9297, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.324 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00435/0.9341, allocations: 0.9207 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 1.398 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02345/0.9575, allocations: 9.679 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 7.648 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004305/0.958, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 7.32 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002035/0.9601, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.848 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01364/0.9737, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 0.6523 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001429/0.9739, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 0.6406 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001004/0.9749, allocations: 144 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 0.5 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001253/0.9751, allocations: 107.9 kB / 1.362 GB, free: 404 kB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.00968/0.9848, allocations: 4.754 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 11.63 MB / 1.092 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06373/1.049, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 8.176 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01311/1.062, allocations: 6.233 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 1.832 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004782/1.067, allocations: 2.556 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 15.28 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02865/1.095, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 1.496 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004268/1.1, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.061e-06/1.1, allocations: 0 / 1.423 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0334/1.133, allocations: 14.29 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 0.8984 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001231/1.133, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 0.7461 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02325/1.156, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 6.316 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001035/1.157, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 6.195 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005962/1.163, allocations: 3.353 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 2.824 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002555/1.166, allocations: 0.9104 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.906 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004275/1.17, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 0.6836 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001377/1.17, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.453 GB, free: 392 kB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006195/1.177, allocations: 3.443 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 12.92 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008348/1.185, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 5.777 MB / 1.186 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06556/1.251, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 15.68 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.736e-05/1.251, allocations: 24 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 15.65 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02071/1.271, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 5.461 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001621/1.272, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 5.387 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001742/1.272, allocations: 84 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 5.305 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001894/1.274, allocations: 0.7088 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 4.574 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005617/1.279, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 3.086 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01445/1.294, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.578 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009607/1.304, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 2.387 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001279/1.305, allocations: 276 kB / 1.526 GB, free: 2.117 MB / 1.248 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01352/1.318, allocations: 7.079 MB / 1.533 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008947/1.327, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.538 GB, free: 3.891 MB / 1.264 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.6279/1.955, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.574 GB, free: 298.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.75e-05/1.955, allocations: 25.75 kB / 1.574 GB, free: 298.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01224/1.968, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 295.4 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 4.795e-05/1.968, allocations: 67.59 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 295.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 6.624e-05/1.968, allocations: 90.03 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 295.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00112/1.969, allocations: 0.7073 MB / 1.585 GB, free: 295.2 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003782/1.973, allocations: 1.485 MB / 1.586 GB, free: 295 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007294/1.98, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.6 GB, free: 283.6 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007326/1.987, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.602 GB, free: 283.5 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.000441/1.988, allocations: 277.1 kB / 1.602 GB, free: 283.4 MB / 1.279 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0009359/1.989, allocations: 0.7522 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 282.9 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0009715/1.99, allocations: 0.7025 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 282.9 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006165/1.996, allocations: 5.142 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 280.2 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.472e-05/1.996, allocations: 26.53 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 280.2 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 8.456e-06/1.996, allocations: 7.75 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 280.2 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.003995/2, allocations: 3.959 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 277.2 MB / 1.279 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01498/2.015, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.625 GB, free: 263.7 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 7.484e-06/2.015, allocations: 0 / 1.625 GB, free: 263.7 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002022/2.017, allocations: 0.6045 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 263.1 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.0009518/2.018, allocations: 0.5783 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 262.5 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0001973/2.018, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.627 GB, free: 262.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007025/2.025, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.641 GB, free: 247.1 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 1.933e-06/2.025, allocations: 4 kB / 1.641 GB, free: 247.1 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.007723/2.033, allocations: 7.157 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 240.2 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.002649/2.036, allocations: 1.698 MB / 1.649 GB, free: 238.5 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0007855/2.036, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.649 GB, free: 238.4 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003464/2.04, allocations: 0.6199 MB / 1.65 GB, free: 237.8 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003184/2.04, allocations: 164.8 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 237.6 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001514/2.04, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 237.5 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.007923/2.048, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 230.2 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.51e-07/2.048, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.657 GB, free: 230.2 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.008313/2.057, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.661 GB, free: 226.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.007953/2.065, allocations: 8.224 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 218 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01346/2.078, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.682 GB, free: 204.4 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 6.342e-06/2.078, allocations: 0.6562 kB / 1.682 GB, free: 204.4 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.002936/2.081, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.685 GB, free: 201.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.009726/2.091, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.688 GB, free: 198.4 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.0837/2.174, allocations: 80.01 MB / 1.766 GB, free: 115.1 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004762/2.179, allocations: 5.362 MB / 1.772 GB, free: 109.7 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.00978/2.189, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.778 GB, free: 103.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003495/2.193, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.781 GB, free: 100.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.32e-07/2.193, allocations: 4 kB / 1.781 GB, free: 100.3 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 3.783/5.976, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.978 GB, free: 12.02 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 27.56/33.53, allocations: 14.75 kB / 1.978 GB, free: 12.01 MB / 1.389 GB
(rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=400 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)