Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.004466/0.004466, allocations: 96.7 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.047 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001645/0.001645, allocations: 194.8 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.973 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.248/1.248, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.32 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.326/2.326, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7106 GB, free: 5.031 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.0017/0.001701, allocations: 63.91 kB / 1.018 GB, free: 15 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2373/0.239, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.166 GB, free: 7.266 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03057/0.2696, allocations: 31.79 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.348 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01587/0.2855, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 11.03 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001362/0.2869, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.209 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002403/0.2893, allocations: 1.103 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 9.859 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004045/0.2934, allocations: 2.083 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 7.77 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.003927/0.2973, allocations: 1.861 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.914 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01802/0.3153, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.328 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008045/0.3234, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 11.05 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.00876/0.3322, allocations: 6.478 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 4.578 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.4475/0.7797, allocations: 5.339 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 18.87 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002102/0.7818, allocations: 0.7524 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 18.87 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.006604/0.7884, allocations: 3.216 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 18.87 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003351/0.7918, allocations: 2.994 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 18.87 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.007426/0.7992, allocations: 4.751 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 18.43 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01632/0.8156, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.31e-06/0.8156, allocations: 2.062 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.954e-06/0.8156, allocations: 1.719 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002882/0.8159, allocations: 0 / 1.278 GB, free: 16.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02487/0.8408, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.72 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.665e-05/0.8408, allocations: 9.625 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.72 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0007923/0.8416, allocations: 0.4913 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.66 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002452/0.8441, allocations: 0.9173 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01697/0.8611, allocations: 9.683 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.957 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0001976/0.8613, allocations: 336.1 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.801 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0009482/0.8623, allocations: 477.6 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.645 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.007704/0.87, allocations: 5.963 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.332 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.12e-05/0.8701, allocations: 18.58 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.328 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003509/0.8704, allocations: 143.2 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.223 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 7.707e-05/0.8705, allocations: 96.88 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.219 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.005828/0.8763, allocations: 4.755 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 5.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04328/0.9196, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 13.27 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.009459/0.9291, allocations: 6.235 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 9.945 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003018/0.9321, allocations: 2.538 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 8.719 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.01917/0.9513, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002816/0.9542, allocations: 2.139 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.3 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.216e-06/0.9542, allocations: 0 / 1.369 GB, free: 13.3 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02101/0.9752, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.89 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.466e-05/0.9753, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.74 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01502/0.9903, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.309 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0004985/0.9908, allocations: 125.1 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.184 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003479/0.9943, allocations: 3.34 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 0.8555 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001525/0.9958, allocations: 0.9118 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 15.95 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001788/0.9976, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.000111/0.9977, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.43 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004771/1.003, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 10.96 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006406/1.009, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 3.863 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05122/1.06, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.13 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 4.234e-05/1.06, allocations: 24 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.11 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01532/1.076, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.434 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.641e-05/1.076, allocations: 74.66 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.355 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.918e-05/1.076, allocations: 84 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.273 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001428/1.077, allocations: 0.7041 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 3.551 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00424/1.081, allocations: 1.479 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 2.164 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01225/1.094, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 2.785 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008454/1.102, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 1.605 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0005861/1.103, allocations: 278.3 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 1.336 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01028/1.113, allocations: 7.087 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 10.24 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006355/1.119, allocations: 5.931 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 3.145 MB / 1.154 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05048/1.17, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.48 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.873e-05/1.17, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.46 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01546/1.185, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.785 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.856e-05/1.186, allocations: 73.67 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.707 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.554e-05/1.186, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.621 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001378/1.187, allocations: 0.7133 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 2.891 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004263/1.191, allocations: 1.476 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 1.504 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01189/1.203, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 2.121 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007621/1.211, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.9453 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.000433/1.211, allocations: 284 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.668 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001179/1.212, allocations: 0.7712 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.99 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001018/1.213, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008275/1.222, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.12 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.97e-05/1.222, allocations: 20 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.11 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.014e-05/1.222, allocations: 8 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.1 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005499/1.227, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 6.113 MB / 1.232 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01996/1.247, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.566 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.018e-05/1.247, allocations: 4 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.562 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002313/1.25, allocations: 0.6054 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.977 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001164/1.251, allocations: 0.5785 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.379 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002534/1.251, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.573 GB, free: 7.25 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01177/1.263, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 7.945 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.937e-06/1.263, allocations: 4 kB / 1.587 GB, free: 7.941 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0101/1.273, allocations: 7.159 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 0.7148 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00327/1.276, allocations: 1.695 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 15 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0008622/1.277, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 14.87 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003655/1.281, allocations: 0.62 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.25 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003824/1.281, allocations: 173.6 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.09 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002017/1.281, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.01 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01094/1.292, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 6.688 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.6e-07/1.292, allocations: 0 / 1.603 GB, free: 6.688 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01129/1.304, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 2.719 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01136/1.315, allocations: 8.224 MB / 1.615 GB, free: 10.48 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01851/1.333, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 13.35 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 4.929e-06/1.333, allocations: 0 / 1.628 GB, free: 13.35 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004045/1.338, allocations: 3.047 MB / 1.631 GB, free: 10.25 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01167/1.349, allocations: 2.943 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 7.355 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1128/1.462, allocations: 80.02 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 4.242 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005722/1.468, allocations: 5.366 MB / 1.718 GB, free: 14.84 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01193/1.48, allocations: 6.428 MB / 1.724 GB, free: 8.418 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004484/1.484, allocations: 2.987 MB / 1.727 GB, free: 5.43 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 4.5e-07/1.484, allocations: 0 / 1.727 GB, free: 5.43 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 3.874/5.359, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.924 GB, free: 440.6 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 36.5/41.86, allocations: 15.67 kB / 1.924 GB, free: 440.6 MB / 1.467 GB (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=400 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)