Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.004608/0.004612, allocations: 97.2 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.039 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001298/0.001298, allocations: 201.9 kB / 16.68 MB, free: 5.961 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.261/1.261, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.316 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.345/2.345, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7106 GB, free: 5.004 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001674/0.001674, allocations: 64.03 kB / 1.018 GB, free: 15 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.245/0.2467, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.166 GB, free: 7.258 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03123/0.2779, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.363 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01661/0.2946, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.0008626/0.2955, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.209 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002193/0.2977, allocations: 1.103 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 9.871 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.003512/0.3012, allocations: 2.087 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 7.777 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.003578/0.3048, allocations: 1.865 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.918 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01906/0.3239, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.344 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.007777/0.3317, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.008619/0.3403, allocations: 6.471 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 4.59 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.5279/0.8682, allocations: 5.343 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 18.45 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002253/0.8704, allocations: 0.7556 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 18.45 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.006674/0.8771, allocations: 3.21 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 18.45 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003243/0.8804, allocations: 3.002 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 18.45 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.007034/0.8874, allocations: 4.747 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 18.01 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01693/0.9044, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.33 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.931e-06/0.9044, allocations: 1.031 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.33 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.533e-06/0.9044, allocations: 0.6875 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.33 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002961/0.9047, allocations: 0 / 1.278 GB, free: 16.33 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02516/0.9299, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.63e-05/0.9299, allocations: 10.25 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0007465/0.9307, allocations: 0.4915 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002344/0.933, allocations: 0.9203 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 11.76 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01557/0.9486, allocations: 9.68 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.734 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0001884/0.9488, allocations: 336.3 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.582 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0007993/0.9496, allocations: 481.5 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.422 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.007815/0.9574, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.113 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.364e-05/0.9575, allocations: 20.3 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.105 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003678/0.9579, allocations: 143.2 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.378e-05/0.958, allocations: 97.86 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 6.996 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006099/0.9641, allocations: 4.755 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 5.617 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05205/1.016, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0155/1.032, allocations: 6.229 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 9.703 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004873/1.037, allocations: 2.549 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 8.473 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02765/1.064, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 15.04 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003098/1.067, allocations: 2.133 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.398e-06/1.067, allocations: 0 / 1.369 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02743/1.095, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.74 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.707e-05/1.095, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.59 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01693/1.112, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.16 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008633/1.113, allocations: 121.2 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.039 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003922/1.117, allocations: 3.343 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 0.707 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001827/1.119, allocations: 0.9168 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 15.8 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001925/1.12, allocations: 1.206 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.58 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001276/1.121, allocations: 308.9 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.28 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005098/1.126, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 10.81 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006969/1.133, allocations: 5.929 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 3.719 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05494/1.188, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.368e-05/1.188, allocations: 31.69 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 13.96 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01663/1.204, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.281 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.185e-05/1.204, allocations: 70.31 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.207 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.038e-05/1.205, allocations: 84.91 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.125 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001542/1.206, allocations: 0.7113 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 3.395 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00459/1.211, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 2.008 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01292/1.224, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 2.641 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00872/1.232, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 1.465 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0005725/1.233, allocations: 280 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 1.191 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01115/1.244, allocations: 7.086 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 10.09 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006929/1.251, allocations: 5.927 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 3.004 MB / 1.154 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05368/1.305, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.33 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.749e-05/1.305, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.31 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01638/1.321, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.637 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.804e-05/1.321, allocations: 77.86 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.555 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.194e-05/1.321, allocations: 84 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.473 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001523/1.323, allocations: 0.7116 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 2.746 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004556/1.327, allocations: 1.48 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 1.359 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01292/1.34, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 1.977 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008216/1.349, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.7891 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0004476/1.349, allocations: 272.1 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.5234 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00126/1.35, allocations: 0.7712 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.84 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001088/1.351, allocations: 0.7016 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008686/1.36, allocations: 5.141 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 9.984 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.496e-05/1.36, allocations: 31.92 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 9.953 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.198e-05/1.36, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 9.941 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005831/1.366, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 5.961 MB / 1.232 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02127/1.387, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.41 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 7.434e-06/1.387, allocations: 0 / 1.571 GB, free: 8.41 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002424/1.39, allocations: 0.6037 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.824 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001193/1.391, allocations: 0.577 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.23 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002746/1.391, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.573 GB, free: 7.098 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0126/1.404, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 7.793 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.768e-06/1.404, allocations: 7.094 kB / 1.587 GB, free: 7.789 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01065/1.414, allocations: 7.155 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 0.5664 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00345/1.418, allocations: 1.7 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 14.84 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0009/1.419, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003798/1.423, allocations: 0.616 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.11 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003744/1.423, allocations: 171.2 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 13.95 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002134/1.423, allocations: 79.95 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0114/1.435, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 6.543 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.51e-07/1.435, allocations: 0 / 1.603 GB, free: 6.543 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01098/1.446, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 2.574 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01179/1.457, allocations: 8.218 MB / 1.615 GB, free: 10.34 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01921/1.477, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 13.21 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 5.129e-06/1.477, allocations: 0 / 1.628 GB, free: 13.21 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004251/1.481, allocations: 3.052 MB / 1.631 GB, free: 10.11 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01175/1.493, allocations: 2.948 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 7.207 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1141/1.607, allocations: 80.01 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 4.109 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005989/1.613, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.718 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01232/1.625, allocations: 6.424 MB / 1.724 GB, free: 8.285 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004608/1.63, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.727 GB, free: 5.301 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 4.91e-07/1.63, allocations: 4 kB / 1.727 GB, free: 5.297 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 1.666/3.296, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.924 GB, free: 439.8 MB / 1.467 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 29.46/32.76, allocations: 11.28 kB / 1.924 GB, free: 439.8 MB / 1.467 GB
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=400 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)