Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007404/0.007404, allocations: 99.33 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.445 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002071/0.002071, allocations: 194.2 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 6.348 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.402/1.402, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.316 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.87/2.87, allocations: 482.4 MB / 0.7548 GB, free: 10.83 MB / 0.6075 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001976/0.001976, allocations: 63.89 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 12.5 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2819/0.2838, allocations: 162.2 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 10.16 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.543/0.8269, allocations: 31.79 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 13 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01824/0.8452, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.285 GB, free: 4.309 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001464/0.8467, allocations: 64.25 kB / 1.285 GB, free: 4.285 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002694/0.8494, allocations: 1.108 MB / 1.286 GB, free: 3.691 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004635/0.8541, allocations: 2.087 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 2.477 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004675/0.8588, allocations: 1.858 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 1.559 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02093/0.8797, allocations: 19.57 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 9.324 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009903/0.8896, allocations: 7.2 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 6.629 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01228/0.9019, allocations: 6.543 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 4.141 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01015/0.9121, allocations: 5.323 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 1.898 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001745/0.9139, allocations: 0.749 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 1.898 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007579/0.9214, allocations: 3.225 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 1.125 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003563/0.925, allocations: 3.002 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 15.36 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.007651/0.9327, allocations: 4.755 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01951/0.9522, allocations: 15.5 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 2.059 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.119e-06/0.9522, allocations: 0 / 1.354 GB, free: 2.059 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.633e-06/0.9523, allocations: 0 / 1.354 GB, free: 2.059 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002887/0.9525, allocations: 1.125 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 2.059 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02705/0.9796, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 9.082 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.075e-05/0.9797, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 9.07 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0008964/0.9806, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 8.57 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002455/0.983, allocations: 0.9235 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 7.645 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01865/1.002, allocations: 9.682 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 13.89 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002687/1.002, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 13.56 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0008534/1.003, allocations: 475.9 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 13.1 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009637/1.012, allocations: 5.972 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 6.887 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.638e-05/1.013, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 6.871 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000412/1.013, allocations: 148 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 6.727 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.875e-05/1.013, allocations: 92 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 6.637 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007654/1.021, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.388 GB, free: 1.859 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05466/1.075, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 14.4 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01197/1.087, allocations: 6.227 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 8.074 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003929/1.091, allocations: 2.552 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 5.516 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02447/1.116, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 7.719 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003261/1.119, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 5.559 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.477e-06/1.119, allocations: 0 / 1.444 GB, free: 5.559 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0274/1.147, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 7.117 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.269e-05/1.147, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.458 GB, free: 6.961 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01884/1.166, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 12.54 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009774/1.167, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 12.42 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004074/1.171, allocations: 3.341 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 9.059 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001747/1.172, allocations: 0.9143 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 8.137 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001978/1.174, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 6.914 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001871/1.175, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 6.617 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005251/1.18, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 3.145 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007081/1.187, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 12.01 MB / 1.186 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05791/1.245, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 5.918 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.931e-05/1.245, allocations: 24 kB / 1.519 GB, free: 5.895 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01844/1.263, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 11.7 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.202e-05/1.263, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 11.63 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001046/1.264, allocations: 84.91 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 11.55 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00171/1.265, allocations: 0.716 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 10.81 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005162/1.27, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 9.32 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01355/1.284, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 9.828 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008626/1.293, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 8.648 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0006443/1.293, allocations: 280 kB / 1.547 GB, free: 8.375 MB / 1.248 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01127/1.305, allocations: 7.076 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 1.289 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007506/1.312, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 10.15 MB / 1.264 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05764/1.37, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 4.121 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.667e-05/1.37, allocations: 24 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 4.098 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01831/1.388, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.605 GB, free: 9.902 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.804e-05/1.388, allocations: 69.95 kB / 1.605 GB, free: 9.828 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.393e-05/1.388, allocations: 84 kB / 1.606 GB, free: 9.746 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001633/1.39, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.606 GB, free: 9.008 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005097/1.395, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 7.531 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01358/1.409, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.622 GB, free: 8.023 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008825/1.418, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.623 GB, free: 6.836 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0006504/1.418, allocations: 280 kB / 1.623 GB, free: 6.562 MB / 1.326 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001393/1.42, allocations: 0.7596 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 5.793 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00191/1.422, allocations: 0.7062 MB / 1.625 GB, free: 5.082 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009379/1.431, allocations: 5.139 MB / 1.63 GB, free: 15.91 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.329e-05/1.431, allocations: 24 kB / 1.63 GB, free: 15.88 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.332e-05/1.431, allocations: 4 kB / 1.63 GB, free: 15.88 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006232/1.437, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 11.88 MB / 1.342 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02496/1.462, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.086e-05/1.462, allocations: 4 kB / 1.647 GB, free: 14.23 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002666/1.465, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 13.63 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001371/1.466, allocations: 0.5872 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002759/1.467, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.648 GB, free: 12.89 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01323/1.48, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.662 GB, free: 13.52 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 1.366e-05/1.48, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.662 GB, free: 13.52 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01142/1.491, allocations: 7.145 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 6.285 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004206/1.495, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.671 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001785/1.497, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.671 GB, free: 4.441 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004998/1.502, allocations: 0.6243 MB / 1.671 GB, free: 3.816 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004042/1.503, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.672 GB, free: 3.652 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002355/1.503, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.672 GB, free: 3.57 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01314/1.516, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.679 GB, free: 12.25 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.7e-07/1.516, allocations: 0 / 1.679 GB, free: 12.25 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01294/1.529, allocations: 3.972 MB / 1.683 GB, free: 8.273 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01271/1.542, allocations: 8.231 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 15.96 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02098/1.563, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.704 GB, free: 2.336 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 5.841e-06/1.563, allocations: 0 / 1.704 GB, free: 2.336 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004592/1.567, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.707 GB, free: 15.2 MB / 1.42 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01388/1.581, allocations: 2.934 MB / 1.71 GB, free: 12.31 MB / 1.42 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1193/1.701, allocations: 80.01 MB / 1.788 GB, free: 8.879 MB / 1.498 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006255/1.707, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.793 GB, free: 3.469 MB / 1.498 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01299/1.72, allocations: 6.432 MB / 1.799 GB, free: 13.05 MB / 1.514 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004802/1.725, allocations: 2.987 MB / 1.802 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 1.514 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 5.91e-07/1.725, allocations: 0 / 1.802 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 1.514 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.7594/2.484, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.999 GB, free: 403.4 MB / 1.529 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 25.13/27.62, allocations: 16.16 kB / 1.999 GB, free: 403.4 MB / 1.529 GB
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate  --output-file Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 400 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches