Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0043/0.0043, allocations: 104.2 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 5.953 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001223/0.001223, allocations: 190.3 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.871 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.343/1.343, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.04 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.708/2.708, allocations: 482.4 MB / 0.7548 GB, free: 6.91 MB / 0.6231 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001895/0.001895, allocations: 70.06 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 13.9 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2742/0.2761, allocations: 162.2 MB / 1.241 GB, free: 9.238 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03386/0.31, allocations: 31.79 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 9.336 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01744/0.3275, allocations: 12.31 MB / 1.285 GB, free: 13 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001089/0.3286, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.285 GB, free: 12.93 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002546/0.3312, allocations: 1.111 MB / 1.286 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004067/0.3352, allocations: 2.077 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 9.734 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004092/0.3393, allocations: 1.857 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 7.883 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01992/0.3593, allocations: 19.57 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 4.27 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009371/0.3687, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 13 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01114/0.3798, allocations: 6.545 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 6.449 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008396/0.3882, allocations: 5.333 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 1.098 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001287/0.3895, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 356 kB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00654/0.3961, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003274/0.3994, allocations: 2.992 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 10.12 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.005822/0.4052, allocations: 4.756 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 5.348 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01634/0.4216, allocations: 15.5 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 5.801 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.048e-06/0.4216, allocations: 4 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 5.797 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.613e-06/0.4216, allocations: 0 / 1.354 GB, free: 5.797 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0001854/0.4218, allocations: 0 / 1.354 GB, free: 5.797 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02345/0.4452, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 9.93 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.943e-05/0.4453, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 9.922 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.000755/0.4461, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 9.422 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002118/0.4482, allocations: 0.9285 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 8.488 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01739/0.4656, allocations: 9.674 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 14.74 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002591/0.4659, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.376 GB, free: 14.41 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0007888/0.4667, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 13.94 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009118/0.4758, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 7.734 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.837e-05/0.4759, allocations: 15.94 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 7.719 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000385/0.4763, allocations: 152 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 7.57 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.895e-05/0.4764, allocations: 99.86 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 7.473 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007429/0.4838, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.388 GB, free: 2.703 MB / 1.107 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05012/0.5339, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01194/0.5459, allocations: 6.232 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 8.91 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003942/0.5499, allocations: 2.548 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 6.352 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02199/0.5719, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 8.555 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00324/0.5751, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 6.402 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.847e-06/0.5751, allocations: 0 / 1.444 GB, free: 6.402 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0245/0.5996, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 7.961 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.163e-05/0.5997, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.458 GB, free: 7.805 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01672/0.6165, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.38 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0003446/0.6168, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.25 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003821/0.6207, allocations: 3.349 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 9.887 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001386/0.6221, allocations: 0.9104 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 8.969 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001976/0.624, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 7.75 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001208/0.6242, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 7.449 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005265/0.6294, allocations: 3.443 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 3.988 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007314/0.6368, allocations: 5.943 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 12.84 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05792/0.6947, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 6.746 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.148e-05/0.6948, allocations: 24 kB / 1.519 GB, free: 6.723 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01618/0.711, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.949e-05/0.7111, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 12.46 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001169/0.7112, allocations: 84 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 12.38 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001541/0.7127, allocations: 0.713 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 11.64 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004868/0.7176, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 10.15 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.5149/1.232, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 267.6 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009433/1.242, allocations: 1.188 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 267.6 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0005624/1.243, allocations: 276.9 kB / 1.547 GB, free: 267.6 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009773/1.252, allocations: 7.082 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 267.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005319/1.258, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 263.1 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04228/1.3, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 247.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.192e-05/1.3, allocations: 24 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 247.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01176/1.312, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.605 GB, free: 237.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.535e-05/1.312, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.605 GB, free: 237.3 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.682e-05/1.312, allocations: 88.62 kB / 1.605 GB, free: 237.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00114/1.313, allocations: 0.7083 MB / 1.606 GB, free: 236.5 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003996/1.317, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 235 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007559/1.325, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.622 GB, free: 219.6 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007344/1.332, allocations: 1.18 MB / 1.623 GB, free: 218.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0003332/1.332, allocations: 279.4 kB / 1.623 GB, free: 218.1 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001096/1.333, allocations: 0.7604 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 217.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0007957/1.334, allocations: 0.6974 MB / 1.625 GB, free: 217.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006471/1.341, allocations: 5.15 MB / 1.63 GB, free: 212 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.565e-05/1.341, allocations: 24 kB / 1.63 GB, free: 211.9 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 8.146e-06/1.341, allocations: 4 kB / 1.63 GB, free: 211.9 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004353/1.345, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 207.9 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0154/1.361, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 194.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 7.745e-06/1.361, allocations: 4 kB / 1.647 GB, free: 194.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002271/1.363, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 193.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.0009948/1.364, allocations: 0.5839 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 193.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002072/1.364, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.648 GB, free: 193 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007545/1.372, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.662 GB, free: 177.7 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.625e-06/1.372, allocations: 8.062 kB / 1.662 GB, free: 177.7 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.007673/1.379, allocations: 7.15 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 170.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.002692/1.382, allocations: 1.695 MB / 1.671 GB, free: 169.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0009086/1.383, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.671 GB, free: 169 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003852/1.387, allocations: 0.6201 MB / 1.671 GB, free: 168.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003683/1.387, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.672 GB, free: 168.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001715/1.387, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.672 GB, free: 168.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.009019/1.396, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.679 GB, free: 160.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3e-07/1.396, allocations: 1.859 kB / 1.679 GB, free: 160.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01071/1.407, allocations: 3.969 MB / 1.683 GB, free: 156.9 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.009122/1.416, allocations: 8.225 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 148.6 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01546/1.432, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.704 GB, free: 135 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 6.612e-06/1.432, allocations: 4 kB / 1.704 GB, free: 135 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003288/1.435, allocations: 3.05 MB / 1.707 GB, free: 131.9 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01304/1.448, allocations: 2.935 MB / 1.71 GB, free: 129 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.09352/1.542, allocations: 80.02 MB / 1.788 GB, free: 45.69 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005115/1.547, allocations: 5.37 MB / 1.793 GB, free: 40.28 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01037/1.557, allocations: 6.427 MB / 1.799 GB, free: 33.87 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00395/1.561, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.802 GB, free: 30.88 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.82e-07/1.561, allocations: 0 / 1.802 GB, free: 30.88 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.3225/1.884, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.999 GB, free: 6.523 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 25.15/27.04, allocations: 15.86 kB / 1.999 GB, free: 6.508 MB / 1.436 GB (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 400 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches