Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007244/0.007244, allocations: 98.77 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.066 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00178/0.00178, allocations: 196.1 kB / 16.68 MB, free: 5.973 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.323/1.323, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.15 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.575/2.575, allocations: 469.8 MB / 0.7425 GB, free: 3.312 MB / 0.6075 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001827/0.001827, allocations: 67.89 kB / 1.065 GB, free: 14 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.8234/0.8252, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 2.023 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03394/0.8592, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 2.141 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01824/0.8775, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 5.824 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00239/0.8799, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.263 GB, free: 5.762 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00345/0.8834, allocations: 1.103 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 4.652 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005816/0.8893, allocations: 2.09 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 2.555 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00518/0.8945, allocations: 1.869 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 0.6914 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02353/0.918, allocations: 19.56 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 13.09 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01091/0.929, allocations: 7.185 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 5.828 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01272/0.9417, allocations: 6.459 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 15.37 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01055/0.9523, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 9.996 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002968/0.9553, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 9.246 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009049/0.9644, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.31 GB, free: 6.02 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005017/0.9694, allocations: 3.003 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 3.008 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009838/0.9793, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0235/1.003, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.135e-06/1.003, allocations: 4 kB / 1.332 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.475e-06/1.003, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.00053/1.003, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03566/1.039, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.836 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.731e-05/1.039, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.828 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001943/1.041, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.328 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004458/1.046, allocations: 0.9246 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 1.398 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02364/1.069, allocations: 9.677 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004133/1.07, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 7.324 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001899/1.072, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.852 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01466/1.086, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 0.6602 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001519/1.086, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 0.6484 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001065/1.088, allocations: 152 kB / 1.362 GB, free: 0.5 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001337/1.088, allocations: 95.88 kB / 1.362 GB, free: 416 kB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009999/1.098, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 11.64 MB / 1.092 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06764/1.165, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 8.18 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01341/1.179, allocations: 6.23 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 1.836 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004595/1.183, allocations: 2.548 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02855/1.212, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 1.512 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004087/1.216, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 15.35 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.38e-06/1.216, allocations: 0 / 1.423 GB, free: 15.35 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03365/1.25, allocations: 14.29 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 0.9102 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001073/1.25, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 0.7539 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02013/1.27, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 6.32 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009547/1.271, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 6.199 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004413/1.276, allocations: 3.345 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 2.84 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002033/1.278, allocations: 0.9143 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.918 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002157/1.28, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 0.6992 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001411/1.28, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.453 GB, free: 408 kB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005259/1.285, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 12.93 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007475/1.293, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 5.785 MB / 1.186 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06007/1.353, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 15.68 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.851e-05/1.353, allocations: 24 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 15.65 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0195/1.372, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 5.461 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001406/1.373, allocations: 71.89 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 5.387 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001465/1.373, allocations: 84.88 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 5.305 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00179/1.374, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 4.574 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005089/1.38, allocations: 1.49 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 3.082 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01583/1.395, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.586 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01067/1.406, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 2.402 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001412/1.408, allocations: 276 kB / 1.526 GB, free: 2.133 MB / 1.248 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01342/1.421, allocations: 7.083 MB / 1.533 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008688/1.43, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.538 GB, free: 3.898 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.6665/2.096, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.574 GB, free: 299.9 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.988e-05/2.096, allocations: 23.47 kB / 1.574 GB, free: 299.9 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01358/2.11, allocations: 10.12 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 297 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.51e-05/2.11, allocations: 68.41 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 296.9 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.32e-05/2.11, allocations: 83.16 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 296.9 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001238/2.111, allocations: 0.7097 MB / 1.585 GB, free: 296.8 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003981/2.115, allocations: 1.476 MB / 1.586 GB, free: 296.6 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008069/2.124, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.6 GB, free: 285.2 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007889/2.131, allocations: 1.187 MB / 1.602 GB, free: 285.1 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0005994/2.132, allocations: 273.1 kB / 1.602 GB, free: 285.1 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001126/2.133, allocations: 0.7596 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 284.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001331/2.135, allocations: 0.7007 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 284.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006584/2.141, allocations: 5.138 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 281.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.748e-05/2.141, allocations: 24 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 281.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 9.077e-06/2.141, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 281.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004128/2.145, allocations: 3.967 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 277.4 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01681/2.162, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.625 GB, free: 263.9 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.063e-05/2.162, allocations: 4 kB / 1.625 GB, free: 263.9 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002127/2.164, allocations: 0.6042 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 263.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001134/2.165, allocations: 0.5719 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 262.7 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002226/2.166, allocations: 138 kB / 1.627 GB, free: 262.6 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007891/2.174, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.641 GB, free: 247.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.298e-06/2.174, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.641 GB, free: 247.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009161/2.183, allocations: 7.149 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 240.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003961/2.187, allocations: 1.695 MB / 1.649 GB, free: 238.7 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001678/2.188, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.649 GB, free: 238.6 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004322/2.193, allocations: 0.6139 MB / 1.65 GB, free: 238 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003833/2.193, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 237.8 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001786/2.193, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 237.7 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.009707/2.203, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 230.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.61e-07/2.203, allocations: 0 / 1.657 GB, free: 230.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0112/2.214, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.661 GB, free: 226.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.008722/2.223, allocations: 8.237 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 218.2 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01508/2.238, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.682 GB, free: 204.6 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.185e-05/2.238, allocations: 1.969 kB / 1.682 GB, free: 204.6 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003302/2.241, allocations: 3.057 MB / 1.685 GB, free: 201.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01164/2.253, allocations: 2.935 MB / 1.688 GB, free: 198.6 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1019/2.355, allocations: 80.02 MB / 1.766 GB, free: 115.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004311/2.359, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.772 GB, free: 109.9 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01062/2.37, allocations: 6.427 MB / 1.778 GB, free: 103.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004501/2.375, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.781 GB, free: 100.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.01e-07/2.375, allocations: 4 kB / 1.781 GB, free: 100.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.2973/2.672, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.978 GB, free: 12.25 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 25.1/27.78, allocations: 16 kB / 1.978 GB, free: 12.23 MB / 1.389 GB (rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches