Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00769/0.00769, allocations: 99.34 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.008 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00198/0.00198, allocations: 198.8 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.934 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.425/1.425, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.328 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.614/2.614, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7105 GB, free: 5 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001823/0.001823, allocations: 63.89 kB / 1.018 GB, free: 15.05 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2987/0.3005, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.166 GB, free: 7.309 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03443/0.335, allocations: 31.79 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.395 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01888/0.3539, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00219/0.3561, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.209 GB, free: 11.01 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003256/0.3594, allocations: 1.111 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 9.895 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005705/0.3652, allocations: 2.072 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 7.816 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005052/0.3702, allocations: 1.862 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.961 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02258/0.3928, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.379 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.0104/0.4033, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 11.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01261/0.4159, allocations: 6.471 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 4.625 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.6143/1.03, allocations: 5.34 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 18.86 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003183/1.033, allocations: 0.7516 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 18.86 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009908/1.043, allocations: 3.216 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 18.86 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006087/1.05, allocations: 2.995 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 18.86 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.0151/1.065, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 18.41 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02766/1.092, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.73 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.045e-06/1.092, allocations: 0 / 1.278 GB, free: 16.73 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.833e-06/1.092, allocations: 1.094 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.73 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004922/1.093, allocations: 0 / 1.278 GB, free: 16.73 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04067/1.134, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.475e-05/1.134, allocations: 8.625 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002728/1.136, allocations: 499.3 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.64 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005851/1.142, allocations: 0.9218 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02419/1.166, allocations: 9.681 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.93 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000396/1.167, allocations: 332.1 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.777 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00267/1.17, allocations: 481.6 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.617 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01516/1.185, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.305 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001117/1.185, allocations: 16.45 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.301 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0006291/1.186, allocations: 143.6 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.195 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001205/1.186, allocations: 96.09 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.191 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009225/1.195, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 5.812 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06667/1.262, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 13.24 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01235/1.274, allocations: 6.231 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 9.914 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004419/1.278, allocations: 2.552 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 8.68 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03159/1.31, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00461/1.315, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.45 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.644e-06/1.315, allocations: 4 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.44 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03932/1.354, allocations: 14.29 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 15.02 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001106/1.354, allocations: 128.5 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02701/1.381, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.449 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00147/1.383, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.328 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006786/1.39, allocations: 3.343 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 0.9961 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002774/1.392, allocations: 0.9194 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 92 kB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.005681/1.398, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001452/1.398, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.57 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.007182/1.406, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009418/1.415, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 4.008 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07091/1.486, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.864e-05/1.486, allocations: 24 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.25 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02377/1.51, allocations: 10.12 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.566 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001367/1.51, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.496 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001493/1.51, allocations: 84 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.414 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001904/1.512, allocations: 0.7135 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 3.684 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005917/1.518, allocations: 1.479 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 2.297 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01377/1.532, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 2.926 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01067/1.543, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 1.742 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001563/1.544, allocations: 276 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 1.473 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01559/1.56, allocations: 7.088 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 10.37 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009467/1.569, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 3.277 MB / 1.154 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07056/1.64, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.21e-05/1.64, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02373/1.664, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.922 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001464/1.664, allocations: 73.64 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.844 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001508/1.664, allocations: 84 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.762 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001859/1.666, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 3.035 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006029/1.672, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 1.645 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01377/1.686, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 2.258 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01082/1.697, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 1.082 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001642/1.698, allocations: 276 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.8125 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002663/1.701, allocations: 0.7766 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 132 kB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00317/1.704, allocations: 0.6947 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01201/1.716, allocations: 5.139 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.27 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.611e-05/1.716, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.24 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.262e-05/1.716, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007019/1.723, allocations: 3.971 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 6.246 MB / 1.232 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0338/1.757, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.695 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.404e-05/1.757, allocations: 0 / 1.571 GB, free: 8.695 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002798/1.76, allocations: 0.6011 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 8.113 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001685/1.762, allocations: 0.5775 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.52 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005744/1.762, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.573 GB, free: 7.387 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01338/1.776, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 8.082 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.997e-06/1.776, allocations: 0 / 1.587 GB, free: 8.082 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01423/1.79, allocations: 7.161 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 0.8555 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005872/1.796, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 15.13 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003176/1.799, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 15 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006855/1.806, allocations: 0.6204 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0009115/1.807, allocations: 167.3 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.23 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0006182/1.808, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.14 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01804/1.826, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 6.824 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 8.71e-07/1.826, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.603 GB, free: 6.816 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0211/1.847, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 2.855 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01596/1.863, allocations: 8.219 MB / 1.615 GB, free: 10.62 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02442/1.887, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 13.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.342e-05/1.887, allocations: 8 kB / 1.628 GB, free: 13.49 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005749/1.893, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.631 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01865/1.912, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 7.504 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1595/2.071, allocations: 80.02 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 4.391 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008427/2.08, allocations: 5.375 MB / 1.718 GB, free: 14.98 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01717/2.097, allocations: 6.427 MB / 1.724 GB, free: 8.562 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007817/2.105, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.727 GB, free: 5.582 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.223e-06/2.105, allocations: 0 / 1.727 GB, free: 5.582 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.8715/2.976, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.924 GB, free: 440.8 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 26.61/29.58, allocations: 17.14 kB / 1.924 GB, free: 440.8 MB / 1.467 GB (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches