Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00541/0.00541, allocations: 99.53 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.48 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001581/0.001581, allocations: 193.5 kB / 16.68 MB, free: 6.363 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.383/1.383, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.305 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.629/2.629, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7105 GB, free: 5.008 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001806/0.001806, allocations: 64.09 kB / 1.018 GB, free: 15.05 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2967/0.2985, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.166 GB, free: 7.309 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03397/0.3325, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.414 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01832/0.3509, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 11.09 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001962/0.3529, allocations: 63.69 kB / 1.209 GB, free: 11.03 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002921/0.3558, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 9.918 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005174/0.3611, allocations: 2.073 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 7.836 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004718/0.3658, allocations: 1.872 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.973 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02119/0.387, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.383 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01016/0.3972, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0115/0.4087, allocations: 6.457 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 4.648 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.6191/1.028, allocations: 5.351 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 18.94 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00319/1.031, allocations: 0.7492 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 18.94 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009651/1.041, allocations: 3.22 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 18.94 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005787/1.047, allocations: 2.999 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 18.94 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01467/1.061, allocations: 4.755 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 18.49 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02711/1.088, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.82 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.273e-06/1.089, allocations: 0 / 1.278 GB, free: 16.82 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.224e-06/1.089, allocations: 1.281 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 16.82 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005147/1.089, allocations: 0 / 1.278 GB, free: 16.82 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04035/1.129, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.78 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.94e-05/1.129, allocations: 8.562 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.78 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001658/1.131, allocations: 497.8 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.72 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004249/1.135, allocations: 0.9244 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.24 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02202/1.157, allocations: 9.68 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 10 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003206/1.158, allocations: 335.8 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.844 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001873/1.16, allocations: 477.6 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.688 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0101/1.17, allocations: 5.961 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.375 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.823e-05/1.17, allocations: 20.11 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.367 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004014/1.17, allocations: 147.3 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.258 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001183/1.17, allocations: 92.78 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.258 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007253/1.178, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 5.875 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05823/1.236, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 13.37 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01122/1.247, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 10.05 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003534/1.251, allocations: 2.55 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 8.82 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02565/1.276, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 15.37 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003443/1.28, allocations: 2.128 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.45 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.772e-06/1.28, allocations: 3.844 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.45 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03192/1.312, allocations: 14.29 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 15.03 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.773e-05/1.312, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02115/1.333, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.453 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001621/1.335, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.332 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005277/1.34, allocations: 3.342 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 1 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002496/1.343, allocations: 0.9158 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 100 kB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002782/1.345, allocations: 1.206 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.000129/1.346, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.58 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005483/1.351, allocations: 3.454 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007541/1.359, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 4.016 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06/1.419, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.28 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.579e-05/1.419, allocations: 24 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.26 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02171/1.44, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.582 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001334/1.441, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.508 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001532/1.441, allocations: 84 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.426 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00184/1.443, allocations: 0.7104 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 3.699 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005502/1.448, allocations: 1.484 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 2.309 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01352/1.462, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 2.938 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01016/1.472, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 1.754 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001407/1.473, allocations: 276 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 1.484 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01376/1.487, allocations: 7.081 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008424/1.496, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 3.297 MB / 1.154 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06009/1.556, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.161e-05/1.556, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01919/1.575, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.941 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.58e-05/1.575, allocations: 73.62 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.863 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001241/1.575, allocations: 88.12 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.777 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001699/1.577, allocations: 0.7155 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 3.047 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005575/1.582, allocations: 1.475 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 1.664 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0133/1.596, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 2.277 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01043/1.606, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 1.102 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001418/1.608, allocations: 272 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.8359 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001586/1.609, allocations: 0.77 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 160 kB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002526/1.612, allocations: 0.7023 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.45 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009416/1.621, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.29 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.779e-05/1.621, allocations: 28 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.26 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.052e-05/1.621, allocations: 4 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.26 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005905/1.627, allocations: 3.963 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 6.273 MB / 1.232 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0279/1.655, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.715 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.179e-05/1.655, allocations: 4 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.711 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002507/1.658, allocations: 0.6009 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 8.129 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001495/1.659, allocations: 0.5771 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.535 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002874/1.66, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.573 GB, free: 7.406 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01303/1.673, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 8.098 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.289e-06/1.673, allocations: 4 kB / 1.587 GB, free: 8.094 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01267/1.685, allocations: 7.16 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 0.8672 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005318/1.691, allocations: 1.694 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 15.15 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002296/1.693, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 15.03 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005262/1.698, allocations: 0.6199 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.41 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004292/1.699, allocations: 164.2 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.25 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002438/1.699, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.17 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01566/1.715, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 6.844 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.91e-07/1.715, allocations: 0 / 1.603 GB, free: 6.844 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02045/1.735, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 2.883 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01485/1.75, allocations: 8.233 MB / 1.615 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02302/1.773, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 13.51 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.172e-05/1.773, allocations: 4 kB / 1.628 GB, free: 13.51 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005251/1.778, allocations: 3.045 MB / 1.631 GB, free: 10.41 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01667/1.795, allocations: 2.94 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 7.52 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1485/1.944, allocations: 80.01 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 4.414 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007092/1.951, allocations: 5.378 MB / 1.718 GB, free: 15 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01526/1.966, allocations: 6.419 MB / 1.724 GB, free: 8.59 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007472/1.973, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.727 GB, free: 5.602 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.51e-07/1.974, allocations: 4 kB / 1.727 GB, free: 5.598 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.8672/2.841, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.924 GB, free: 440.7 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 26.74/29.58, allocations: 5.719 kB / 1.924 GB, free: 440.6 MB / 1.467 GB (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches