Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001574/0.001574, allocations: 108 kB / 15.61 MB, free: 128 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001852/0.001852, allocations: 197 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.672 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.375/1.375, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.395 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.765/2.765, allocations: 472.6 MB / 0.7451 GB, free: 4.668 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001299/0.001299, allocations: 64.41 kB / 0.9121 GB, free: 33.25 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3199/0.3212, allocations: 159.9 MB / 1.068 GB, free: 10.42 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03399/0.3552, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.099 GB, free: 10.54 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0195/0.3748, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 14.21 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002752/0.3776, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.111 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003543/0.3811, allocations: 1.1 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 13.04 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006172/0.3874, allocations: 2.103 MB / 1.114 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005162/0.3925, allocations: 1.843 MB / 1.116 GB, free: 9.098 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02153/0.4141, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 5.523 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009912/0.424, allocations: 7.204 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01171/0.4358, allocations: 6.433 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 7.809 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009888/0.4457, allocations: 5.492 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 2.297 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00297/0.4487, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 1.551 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008979/0.4577, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 14.32 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005323/0.4631, allocations: 2.925 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 11.39 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01074/0.4738, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 6.613 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02174/0.4956, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 7.25 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.953e-06/0.4957, allocations: 0 / 1.18 GB, free: 7.25 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.104e-06/0.4957, allocations: 0 / 1.18 GB, free: 7.25 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000518/0.4962, allocations: 4 kB / 1.18 GB, free: 7.246 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03486/0.5311, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 11.64 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.701e-05/0.5311, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.192 GB, free: 11.64 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004395/0.5355, allocations: 0.8771 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02201/0.5576, allocations: 9.348 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 1.324 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004039/0.558, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 0.9922 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001978/0.56, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 0.5234 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01115/0.5712, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.945e-05/0.5713, allocations: 15.86 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.3 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003904/0.5717, allocations: 148 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.16 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001111/0.5718, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008714/0.5805, allocations: 4.754 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 5.297 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05886/0.6394, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 1.738 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.537/1.176, allocations: 6.227 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 159.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00354/1.18, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 159.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02288/1.203, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 154.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00322/1.206, allocations: 2.132 MB / 1.27 GB, free: 153.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.27e-06/1.206, allocations: 2.016 kB / 1.27 GB, free: 153.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02332/1.23, allocations: 14.03 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 148.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.491e-05/1.23, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.284 GB, free: 148 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02073/1.25, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 143.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00115/1.252, allocations: 113.6 kB / 1.294 GB, free: 143.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003247/1.255, allocations: 3.304 MB / 1.297 GB, free: 141 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001612/1.256, allocations: 0.8675 MB / 1.298 GB, free: 140.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001732/1.258, allocations: 1.211 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 139.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.749e-05/1.258, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 139.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.00399/1.262, allocations: 3.453 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 137.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005049/1.267, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 132.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04436/1.312, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 98.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.616e-05/1.312, allocations: 24 kB / 1.344 GB, free: 98.27 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01562/1.327, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 88.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001071/1.328, allocations: 69.95 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 88.04 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001529/1.328, allocations: 84 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 87.95 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001581/1.329, allocations: 0.715 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 87.22 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004689/1.334, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 85.74 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009132/1.343, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.371 GB, free: 70.27 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0097/1.353, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.372 GB, free: 69.09 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001013/1.354, allocations: 280 kB / 1.372 GB, free: 68.82 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009803/1.364, allocations: 7.092 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 61.72 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005843/1.37, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 54.59 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04957/1.419, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 16.57 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.22e-05/1.419, allocations: 24 kB / 1.421 GB, free: 16.55 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01553/1.435, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 6.391 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.327e-05/1.435, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 6.316 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001004/1.435, allocations: 84 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 6.234 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00138/1.436, allocations: 0.7091 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 5.504 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004586/1.441, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 4.02 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01094/1.452, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 4.543 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00926/1.461, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 3.355 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001038/1.462, allocations: 275.9 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 3.086 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001975/1.464, allocations: 0.7594 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 2.328 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002771/1.467, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 1.66 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009861/1.477, allocations: 5.155 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 12.48 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.519e-05/1.477, allocations: 27.92 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.865e-05/1.477, allocations: 12 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 12.44 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005802/1.483, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.459 GB, free: 8.445 MB / 1.029 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02713/1.51, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.889e-06/1.51, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002552/1.513, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 10.26 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001385/1.514, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 9.656 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003/1.514, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 9.523 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01155/1.526, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.487 GB, free: 10.17 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.735e-06/1.526, allocations: 1.531 kB / 1.487 GB, free: 10.17 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01144/1.537, allocations: 7.129 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 2.953 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004713/1.542, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 1.262 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002608/1.545, allocations: 127.8 kB / 1.496 GB, free: 1.137 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005953/1.551, allocations: 0.6159 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 0.5195 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004609/1.551, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.496 GB, free: 360 kB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002626/1.551, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.497 GB, free: 276 kB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01848/1.57, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 8.945 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.81e-07/1.57, allocations: 0 / 1.504 GB, free: 8.945 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01929/1.589, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 5.012 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002408/1.592, allocations: 0.59 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 4.48 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03012/1.622, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.526 GB, free: 2.348 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.187e-05/1.622, allocations: 0 / 1.526 GB, free: 2.348 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004982/1.627, allocations: 3.05 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 15.21 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01819/1.645, allocations: 2.947 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 12.32 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03638/1.681, allocations: 18.94 MB / 1.55 GB, free: 9.355 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00805/1.69, allocations: 5.376 MB / 1.555 GB, free: 3.945 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01568/1.705, allocations: 6.452 MB / 1.562 GB, free: 13.51 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002782/1.708, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.562 GB, free: 13.09 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.92e-07/1.708, allocations: 0 / 1.562 GB, free: 13.09 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2269/1.935, allocations: 143.5 MB / 1.702 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 1.279 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches