Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001102/0.001102, allocations: 108 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 132 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001198/0.001198, allocations: 192.9 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.391 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.348/1.348, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.395 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.359/2.359, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6646 GB, free: 440 kB / 0.5137 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001276/0.001276, allocations: 64.14 kB / 0.8125 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 0.67 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.6524/0.6536, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9496 GB, free: 9.355 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03213/0.6858, allocations: 31.78 MB / 0.9806 GB, free: 15.87 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02097/0.7068, allocations: 12.28 MB / 0.9926 GB, free: 5.789 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003629/0.7105, allocations: 55.69 kB / 0.9927 GB, free: 5.734 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003822/0.7144, allocations: 1.107 MB / 0.9938 GB, free: 4.621 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006896/0.7213, allocations: 2.082 MB / 0.9958 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005594/0.7269, allocations: 1.854 MB / 0.9976 GB, free: 0.6836 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02041/0.7474, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 13.1 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01031/0.7577, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 5.836 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01357/0.7713, allocations: 6.446 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 15.39 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01296/0.7843, allocations: 5.485 MB / 1.035 GB, free: 9.883 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004506/0.7889, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 9.133 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009688/0.7986, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 5.898 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004998/0.8036, allocations: 2.929 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 2.961 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009798/0.8134, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 14.19 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02059/0.8341, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 14.83 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.658e-06/0.8341, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 14.83 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.796e-06/0.8341, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 14.83 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005008/0.8346, allocations: 4 kB / 1.062 GB, free: 14.83 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03265/0.8673, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.223 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.6e-05/0.8674, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.215 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003425/0.8708, allocations: 0.8766 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 2.328 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02088/0.8917, allocations: 9.356 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.895 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003118/0.892, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.57 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001542/0.8936, allocations: 483.7 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 8.098 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01004/0.9037, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.898 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.626e-05/0.9038, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.887 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003884/0.9042, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.742 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.358e-05/0.9043, allocations: 96 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.648 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007921/0.9122, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.094 GB, free: 12.88 MB / 0.8575 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06103/0.9732, allocations: 33.89 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 9.328 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01166/0.985, allocations: 6.221 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 3 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003635/0.9886, allocations: 2.507 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 500 kB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02568/1.014, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 2.703 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003124/1.017, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 0.5391 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.338e-06/1.018, allocations: 0 / 1.151 GB, free: 0.5391 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02884/1.046, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 2.344 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001044/1.047, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.165 GB, free: 2.191 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02173/1.068, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.766 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001406/1.07, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.645 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005328/1.075, allocations: 3.293 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 4.332 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002399/1.077, allocations: 0.8746 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 3.445 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002576/1.08, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.227 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001409/1.08, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 1.93 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006241/1.086, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.184 GB, free: 14.45 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007605/1.094, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.19 GB, free: 7.32 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05714/1.151, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 1.223 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.37e-05/1.151, allocations: 24 kB / 1.226 GB, free: 1.199 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02071/1.172, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 7.035 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001246/1.172, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.965 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001347/1.172, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.879 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00177/1.174, allocations: 0.713 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.145 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005743/1.18, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 4.66 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0123/1.192, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 5.164 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01028/1.203, allocations: 1.17 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.992 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001469/1.204, allocations: 280 kB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.719 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.553/1.757, allocations: 7.078 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 273.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007714/1.765, allocations: 5.929 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 270.5 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05578/1.821, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 253.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001738/1.821, allocations: 25.12 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 253.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01761/1.839, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 246.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001754/1.839, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 246.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000138/1.839, allocations: 88 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 246.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001441/1.84, allocations: 0.7126 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 245.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005021/1.845, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 243.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008602/1.854, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 228.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008966/1.863, allocations: 1.18 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 227.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001149/1.864, allocations: 280 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 227.1 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001821/1.866, allocations: 0.7597 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 226.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002161/1.868, allocations: 0.6682 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 226.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007928/1.876, allocations: 5.137 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 220.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.278e-05/1.876, allocations: 20 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 220.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.883e-05/1.876, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 220.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004741/1.881, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 216.9 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02276/1.904, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 203.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.328e-06/1.904, allocations: 0 / 1.353 GB, free: 203.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002224/1.906, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 202.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001201/1.907, allocations: 0.5837 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 202.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000225/1.907, allocations: 132.5 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 202 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008093/1.916, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 186.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.615e-06/1.916, allocations: 4 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 186.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009306/1.925, allocations: 7.122 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 179.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004276/1.929, allocations: 1.662 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 178.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00215/1.931, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 178.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00503/1.936, allocations: 0.6125 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 177.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004329/1.937, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 177.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001889/1.937, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 177.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0112/1.948, allocations: 7.334 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 169.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.092e-06/1.948, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 169.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01486/1.963, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 165.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002215/1.965, allocations: 0.6138 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 165.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02307/1.989, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 147.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.929e-06/1.989, allocations: 0 / 1.407 GB, free: 147.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.00352/1.992, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 144.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01304/2.005, allocations: 2.926 MB / 1.413 GB, free: 141.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.02463/2.03, allocations: 18.94 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 122.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00597/2.036, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 116.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01298/2.049, allocations: 6.449 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 110.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002007/2.051, allocations: 431.3 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 110.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 6.91e-07/2.051, allocations: 0 / 1.443 GB, free: 110.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1832/2.234, allocations: 143.5 MB / 1.583 GB, free: 15.95 MB / 1.061 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches