Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001081/0.001081, allocations: 108 kB / 15.61 MB, free: 152 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001246/0.001246, allocations: 196.6 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.664 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.352/1.352, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.395 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.337/2.337, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6647 GB, free: 428 kB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001462/0.001462, allocations: 67.89 kB / 0.8125 GB, free: 14.45 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.7275/0.7289, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9496 GB, free: 9.121 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03308/0.7621, allocations: 31.75 MB / 0.9806 GB, free: 15.66 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02013/0.7822, allocations: 12.3 MB / 0.9926 GB, free: 5.688 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002739/0.785, allocations: 63.97 kB / 0.9927 GB, free: 5.66 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00327/0.7883, allocations: 1.096 MB / 0.9937 GB, free: 4.559 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00656/0.7949, allocations: 2.08 MB / 0.9958 GB, free: 2.469 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007624/0.8026, allocations: 1.863 MB / 0.9976 GB, free: 0.6133 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02182/0.8244, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 13.03 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009246/0.8337, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 5.762 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01091/0.8446, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009623/0.8543, allocations: 5.492 MB / 1.035 GB, free: 9.816 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002055/0.8564, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 9.066 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008158/0.8645, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 5.828 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004538/0.8691, allocations: 2.922 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 2.898 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008901/0.878, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 14.12 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01829/0.8963, allocations: 15.31 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.304e-06/0.8964, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.062 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.373e-06/0.8964, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004005/0.8968, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.062 GB, free: 14.76 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02974/0.9266, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.156 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.58e-05/0.9266, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.145 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003054/0.9297, allocations: 0.8766 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 2.258 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01964/0.9493, allocations: 9.348 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.832 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002721/0.9496, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.5 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001514/0.9512, allocations: 479.7 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 8.031 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009716/0.9609, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.089 GB, free: 1.836 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.906e-05/0.961, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.828 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003884/0.9614, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.68 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.201e-05/0.9615, allocations: 107.9 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.574 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007177/0.9687, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.094 GB, free: 12.8 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05086/1.02, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 9.25 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01127/1.031, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 2.922 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003811/1.035, allocations: 2.501 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 424 kB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02352/1.058, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 2.629 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002836/1.061, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 484 kB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.596e-06/1.061, allocations: 0 / 1.151 GB, free: 484 kB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02743/1.089, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 2.273 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.389e-05/1.089, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.165 GB, free: 2.121 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01996/1.109, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.699 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001082/1.11, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.578 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004058/1.114, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 4.254 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002923/1.117, allocations: 0.8668 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 3.375 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00313/1.12, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.152 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001166/1.12, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 1.855 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006732/1.127, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.184 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00975/1.137, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.19 GB, free: 7.238 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05928/1.196, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 1.156 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.954e-05/1.196, allocations: 24 kB / 1.226 GB, free: 1.133 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02101/1.217, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.965 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001616/1.217, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.891 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001684/1.217, allocations: 84 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.809 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00189/1.219, allocations: 0.7168 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005935/1.225, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 4.59 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01279/1.238, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 5.098 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01094/1.249, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.922 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001521/1.251, allocations: 276 kB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.652 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.5944/1.845, allocations: 7.085 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 272.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00816/1.853, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 269.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05609/1.909, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 252.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001526/1.91, allocations: 33.06 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 252.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01535/1.925, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 244.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.64e-05/1.925, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 244 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001096/1.925, allocations: 84 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 244 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001377/1.927, allocations: 0.7127 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 243.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004971/1.932, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 241.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008287/1.94, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 226.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009069/1.949, allocations: 1.183 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 225.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001147/1.95, allocations: 287.9 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001279/1.951, allocations: 0.7585 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00225/1.954, allocations: 0.6613 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 223.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007139/1.961, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.979e-05/1.961, allocations: 25.88 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.156e-05/1.961, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00448/1.965, allocations: 3.967 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 214.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02135/1.987, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 201.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.888e-06/1.987, allocations: 4 kB / 1.353 GB, free: 201.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002301/1.989, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 200.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001269/1.99, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 199.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002871/1.991, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 199.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008413/1.999, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 184.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.531e-06/1.999, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 184.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01013/2.009, allocations: 7.112 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 177.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004352/2.014, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 176 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002197/2.016, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 175.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005937/2.022, allocations: 0.6044 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 175.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005512/2.022, allocations: 169.3 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 175.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002417/2.023, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 175 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01373/2.036, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 167.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.91e-07/2.037, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 167.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01874/2.055, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 163.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00226/2.058, allocations: 0.6083 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 163.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02414/2.082, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 145.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.37e-05/2.082, allocations: 5.406 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 145.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003767/2.086, allocations: 3.046 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 142 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01449/2.1, allocations: 2.951 MB / 1.413 GB, free: 139.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.02771/2.128, allocations: 18.92 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 120.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005267/2.133, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 114.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01415/2.147, allocations: 6.449 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 108.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00277/2.15, allocations: 431.3 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 107.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.21e-07/2.15, allocations: 0 / 1.443 GB, free: 107.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1828/2.333, allocations: 143.5 MB / 1.583 GB, free: 13.77 MB / 1.061 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches