Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001625/0.001625, allocations: 108 kB / 15.61 MB, free: 152 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001651/0.001651, allocations: 197.9 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.664 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.45/1.45, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.391 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.718/2.718, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7104 GB, free: 5.043 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001956/0.001956, allocations: 71.89 kB / 0.8692 GB, free: 4.641 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.6181/0.6201, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.461 MB / 0.7637 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03541/0.6555, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 2.582 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01935/0.6749, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.262 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002178/0.6771, allocations: 67.62 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.195 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003181/0.6803, allocations: 1.1 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.09 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005743/0.6861, allocations: 2.082 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 3 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005318/0.6914, allocations: 1.861 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 1.145 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02256/0.714, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 13.57 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01039/0.7244, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 6.305 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01187/0.7363, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 15.87 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01054/0.7469, allocations: 5.492 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003557/0.7505, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 9.609 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009828/0.7604, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.379 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005165/0.7656, allocations: 2.929 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 3.441 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009427/0.775, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.114 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01877/0.7938, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.301e-06/0.7939, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.763e-06/0.7939, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003395/0.7942, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02863/0.8229, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.703 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.036e-05/0.8229, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.695 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003016/0.8259, allocations: 0.8848 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 2.801 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02337/0.8493, allocations: 9.355 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 9.371 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003473/0.8497, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 9.043 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00153/0.8512, allocations: 487.7 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 8.566 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01064/0.8619, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.367 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.863e-05/0.862, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.355 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003884/0.8624, allocations: 148 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.211 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001073/0.8625, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.121 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.00803/0.8706, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 13.34 MB / 0.92 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05714/0.9277, allocations: 33.89 MB / 1.195 GB, free: 9.793 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01218/0.9399, allocations: 6.232 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 3.461 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003883/0.9438, allocations: 2.504 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 0.957 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.025/0.9688, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 3.18 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00334/0.9722, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 1.016 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.456e-06/0.9722, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.219 GB, free: 1.012 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02618/0.9984, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 2.809 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.503e-05/0.9986, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.66 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01818/1.017, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 8.234 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008362/1.018, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.243 GB, free: 8.113 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004068/1.022, allocations: 3.297 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.797 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001747/1.023, allocations: 0.8668 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.918 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001948/1.025, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.695 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.000133/1.026, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.395 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.5416/1.567, allocations: 3.444 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 206.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008698/1.576, allocations: 5.942 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 203.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05479/1.631, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 188.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001815/1.631, allocations: 26.75 kB / 1.293 GB, free: 188.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01615/1.647, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00015/1.647, allocations: 77.69 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001591/1.647, allocations: 88.12 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001571/1.649, allocations: 0.7082 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 179.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004889/1.654, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 178 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008829/1.663, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 162.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009124/1.672, allocations: 1.176 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 161.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001218/1.673, allocations: 272 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 161.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00944/1.683, allocations: 7.089 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 154 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005803/1.688, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 146.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04721/1.736, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 108.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.824e-05/1.736, allocations: 24 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 108.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0151/1.751, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.06 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.823e-05/1.751, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 98.99 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.895e-05/1.751, allocations: 84 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.91 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001421/1.753, allocations: 0.7128 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.17 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00459/1.757, allocations: 1.481 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 96.69 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008589/1.766, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 81.26 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008445/1.774, allocations: 1.18 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.09 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009602/1.775, allocations: 283.9 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 79.81 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002179/1.777, allocations: 0.754 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.09 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00231/1.78, allocations: 0.6656 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 78.79 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008339/1.788, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.61 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.09e-05/1.788, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.59 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.135e-05/1.788, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.58 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00468/1.793, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 69.59 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02228/1.815, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 56.02 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.878e-06/1.815, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.421 GB, free: 56.01 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00238/1.817, allocations: 0.6011 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.41 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00125/1.819, allocations: 0.5871 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 54.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002972/1.819, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.422 GB, free: 54.67 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008304/1.827, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.31 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.287e-06/1.827, allocations: 4 kB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009603/1.837, allocations: 7.125 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 32.09 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004077/1.841, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 30.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002233/1.843, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 30.28 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005261/1.849, allocations: 0.6082 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.67 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004727/1.849, allocations: 169.6 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002532/1.849, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.42 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01335/1.863, allocations: 7.334 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 22.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 6.31e-07/1.863, allocations: 0 / 1.453 GB, free: 22.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01581/1.879, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 18.17 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002047/1.881, allocations: 0.5997 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 17.64 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02454/1.905, allocations: 17.99 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 15.51 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.115e-05/1.905, allocations: 4 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 15.51 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005204/1.91, allocations: 3.035 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 12.38 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0165/1.927, allocations: 2.946 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.488 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03644/1.963, allocations: 18.93 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 6.586 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008005/1.971, allocations: 5.376 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 1.176 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01499/1.987, allocations: 6.444 MB / 1.511 GB, free: 10.74 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002063/1.989, allocations: 427.3 kB / 1.511 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.31e-07/1.989, allocations: 0 / 1.511 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.25/2.239, allocations: 143.5 MB / 1.651 GB, free: 12.23 MB / 1.186 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches