Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00166/0.00166, allocations: 108 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 132 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002028/0.002028, allocations: 193.9 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.391 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.353/1.353, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.414 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.664/2.664, allocations: 461.9 MB / 0.7346 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001439/0.001439, allocations: 66.14 kB / 0.8992 GB, free: 37.01 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2556/0.257, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.053 GB, free: 8.273 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03177/0.2888, allocations: 31.78 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 8.379 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01686/0.3057, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 12.05 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001993/0.3078, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.096 GB, free: 12 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003268/0.311, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 10.88 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00534/0.3164, allocations: 2.087 MB / 1.099 GB, free: 8.789 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004706/0.3212, allocations: 1.846 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 6.949 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02076/0.3419, allocations: 19.53 MB / 1.12 GB, free: 3.375 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008996/0.351, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01073/0.3617, allocations: 6.439 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 5.656 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.00847/0.3702, allocations: 5.488 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 152 kB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002796/0.3731, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 15.4 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008157/0.3812, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.143 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004501/0.3858, allocations: 2.929 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 9.238 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008524/0.3943, allocations: 4.741 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 4.477 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01706/0.4114, allocations: 15.33 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 5.105 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.372e-06/0.4115, allocations: 0 / 1.165 GB, free: 5.105 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.963e-06/0.4115, allocations: 0 / 1.165 GB, free: 5.105 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003734/0.4119, allocations: 4 kB / 1.165 GB, free: 5.102 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02814/0.44, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.492 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.531e-05/0.4401, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.48 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001486/0.4416, allocations: 0.4885 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 8.98 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00356/0.4451, allocations: 0.8769 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 8.094 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0201/0.4653, allocations: 9.353 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003137/0.4656, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.34 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00156/0.4672, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.188 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01096/0.4781, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.672 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.585e-05/0.4783, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.664 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0006548/0.4789, allocations: 148 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.52 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001048/0.479, allocations: 107.9 kB / 1.194 GB, free: 7.414 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007713/0.4868, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 2.645 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05374/0.5405, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.231 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01179/0.5524, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 8.758 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003859/0.5562, allocations: 2.498 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 6.254 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.5059/1.062, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 170.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00292/1.065, allocations: 2.132 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 170.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.318e-06/1.065, allocations: 0 / 1.255 GB, free: 170.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02598/1.091, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.269 GB, free: 167.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.515e-05/1.091, allocations: 132.4 kB / 1.269 GB, free: 167.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01783/1.109, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 165.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007679/1.11, allocations: 118.7 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 165.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00343/1.113, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.282 GB, free: 163 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001545/1.115, allocations: 0.8677 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 162.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002595/1.117, allocations: 1.212 MB / 1.284 GB, free: 161.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.578e-05/1.117, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.285 GB, free: 161.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004391/1.122, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 160.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.004959/1.127, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 155.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04434/1.171, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 123 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.838e-05/1.171, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.329 GB, free: 123 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01385/1.185, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 112.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.576e-05/1.185, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 112.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.251e-05/1.185, allocations: 84.88 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 112.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001341/1.187, allocations: 0.7111 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 111.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004495/1.191, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.342 GB, free: 110.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008169/1.199, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 95 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008379/1.208, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 93.81 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0007457/1.209, allocations: 276 kB / 1.357 GB, free: 93.54 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008538/1.217, allocations: 7.087 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 86.45 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005071/1.222, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 79.32 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04478/1.267, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 41.31 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.53e-05/1.267, allocations: 27.72 kB / 1.406 GB, free: 41.29 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01398/1.281, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 31.13 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.782e-05/1.281, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 31.05 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.676e-05/1.281, allocations: 85.19 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 30.97 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0013/1.283, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 30.23 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00452/1.287, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 28.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008219/1.295, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.432 GB, free: 13.29 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008577/1.304, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0007723/1.305, allocations: 276 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 11.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00143/1.306, allocations: 0.7649 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001938/1.308, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.435 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007717/1.316, allocations: 5.154 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 5.207 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.891e-05/1.316, allocations: 20 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 5.188 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.452e-05/1.316, allocations: 8 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 5.18 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004727/1.321, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 1.188 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02642/1.347, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 3.602 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.37e-05/1.347, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.457 GB, free: 3.594 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002555/1.35, allocations: 0.5939 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001341/1.351, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 2.395 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003056/1.351, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.458 GB, free: 2.266 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01133/1.363, allocations: 14.41 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.902 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.3e-06/1.363, allocations: 4.031 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.898 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01177/1.374, allocations: 7.122 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 11.69 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004294/1.379, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 10 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002437/1.381, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.875 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005717/1.387, allocations: 0.6202 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.254 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004876/1.387, allocations: 165.6 kB / 1.482 GB, free: 9.09 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002543/1.388, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.482 GB, free: 9.008 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01365/1.401, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 1.68 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.61e-07/1.401, allocations: 0 / 1.489 GB, free: 1.68 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01428/1.416, allocations: 3.957 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 13.75 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01279/1.429, allocations: 8.175 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 5.547 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02717/1.456, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.414 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 7.884e-06/1.456, allocations: 0 / 1.518 GB, free: 3.414 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004267/1.46, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.521 GB, free: 292 kB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01393/1.474, allocations: 2.934 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 13.41 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1401/1.614, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.622 GB, free: 0.9102 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009146/1.623, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 11.5 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01611/1.639, allocations: 6.449 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 5.062 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006884/1.646, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.637 GB, free: 2.086 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.062e-06/1.646, allocations: 0 / 1.637 GB, free: 2.086 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 3.787/5.433, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.84 GB, free: 373.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 18.11/23.54, allocations: 2.312 kB / 1.84 GB, free: 373.1 MB / 1.295 GB (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)