Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001503/0.001503, allocations: 108 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 132 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001702/0.001702, allocations: 194.5 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.391 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.299/1.299, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.422 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.21/2.21, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6647 GB, free: 460 kB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001211/0.001211, allocations: 59.91 kB / 0.8126 GB, free: 14.37 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.4957/0.4969, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9497 GB, free: 9.184 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02837/0.5253, allocations: 31.76 MB / 0.9807 GB, free: 15.72 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01687/0.5422, allocations: 12.29 MB / 0.9927 GB, free: 5.68 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001789/0.544, allocations: 59.69 kB / 0.9928 GB, free: 5.621 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002586/0.5466, allocations: 1.1 MB / 0.9939 GB, free: 4.516 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004447/0.5511, allocations: 2.08 MB / 0.9959 GB, free: 2.426 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00421/0.5553, allocations: 1.854 MB / 0.9977 GB, free: 0.5781 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01664/0.572, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 12.99 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.00816/0.5802, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 5.723 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.009681/0.5899, allocations: 6.438 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.007717/0.5976, allocations: 5.488 MB / 1.035 GB, free: 9.777 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00218/0.5998, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 9.027 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007702/0.6075, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 5.789 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004397/0.6119, allocations: 2.922 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 2.859 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009099/0.621, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 14.08 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01791/0.6389, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.07e-06/0.639, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.392e-06/0.639, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004179/0.6394, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02828/0.6677, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.121 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.205e-05/0.6677, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.109 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001422/0.6692, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 2.609 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003307/0.6725, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 1.719 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01823/0.6907, allocations: 9.352 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 8.289 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002054/0.6909, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.961 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0007873/0.6917, allocations: 487.7 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.484 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.008561/0.7003, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.285 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.851e-05/0.7004, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.273 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003468/0.7007, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.129 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.329e-05/0.7008, allocations: 99.92 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.031 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006679/0.7075, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.26 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04733/0.7549, allocations: 33.89 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 8.719 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01069/0.7656, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 2.387 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00332/0.7689, allocations: 2.507 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 15.88 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.01977/0.7887, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 2.09 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00263/0.7914, allocations: 2.13 MB / 1.152 GB, free: 15.94 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.478e-06/0.7914, allocations: 0 / 1.152 GB, free: 15.94 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02184/0.8132, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 1.742 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.156e-05/0.8133, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.165 GB, free: 1.59 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01636/0.8297, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 7.16 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0004493/0.8301, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 7.039 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003473/0.8336, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 3.719 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001305/0.8349, allocations: 0.8668 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.84 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001932/0.8369, allocations: 1.217 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 1.613 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 7.942e-05/0.837, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 1.316 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004425/0.8414, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 13.85 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005507/0.8469, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.19 GB, free: 6.707 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04718/0.8941, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.6172 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.286e-05/0.8942, allocations: 24 kB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.5938 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01472/0.9089, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.422 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.154e-05/0.909, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.352 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001047/0.9091, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.266 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001475/0.9106, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 5.531 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004577/0.9152, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 4.051 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0112/0.9264, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008204/0.9346, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 3.383 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0008088/0.9355, allocations: 280 kB / 1.254 GB, free: 3.109 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.3863/1.322, allocations: 7.081 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 272.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005651/1.327, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 269.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04363/1.371, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 252 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.000114/1.371, allocations: 27.34 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 252 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01233/1.384, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.401e-05/1.384, allocations: 75.31 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 6.098e-05/1.384, allocations: 84 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001254/1.385, allocations: 0.7045 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 242.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003909/1.389, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 241.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007518/1.396, allocations: 14.54 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 225.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007289/1.404, allocations: 1.175 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0003726/1.404, allocations: 280 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0009543/1.405, allocations: 0.7596 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 223.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0008635/1.406, allocations: 0.6602 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 223.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006114/1.412, allocations: 5.14 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 218.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.606e-05/1.412, allocations: 24 kB / 1.337 GB, free: 218.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 8.707e-06/1.412, allocations: 9.688 kB / 1.337 GB, free: 218.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004071/1.416, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 214.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01667/1.433, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 200.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.927e-06/1.433, allocations: 4 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 200.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002119/1.435, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 200 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.0009683/1.436, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 199.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0001976/1.436, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 199.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007485/1.444, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 184 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.248e-06/1.444, allocations: 11.97 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 184 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.008015/1.452, allocations: 7.12 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 177.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003043/1.455, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 175.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001476/1.456, allocations: 123.1 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 175.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004391/1.461, allocations: 0.616 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003586/1.461, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001989/1.461, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01148/1.473, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.386 GB, free: 167.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.51e-07/1.473, allocations: 0 / 1.386 GB, free: 167.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01215/1.485, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 163.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.009966/1.495, allocations: 8.193 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 155 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02178/1.517, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 136.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 7.794e-06/1.517, allocations: 4 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 136.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003125/1.52, allocations: 3.051 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 133.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01143/1.531, allocations: 2.938 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 130.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1014/1.633, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 22.42 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005477/1.638, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 17.02 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01134/1.65, allocations: 6.449 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 10.58 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004021/1.654, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.534 GB, free: 7.602 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.91e-07/1.654, allocations: 0 / 1.534 GB, free: 7.602 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 2.242/3.896, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.8 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 16.4/20.29, allocations: 17.05 kB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.8 MB / 1.17 GB
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)