Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001441/0.001441, allocations: 108 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 132 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001381/0.001381, allocations: 198.5 kB / 16.54 MB, free: 6.672 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.269/1.269, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.395 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.489/2.489, allocations: 469.8 MB / 0.7424 GB, free: 7.434 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001733/0.001733, allocations: 69.98 kB / 0.9087 GB, free: 34.28 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2508/0.2526, allocations: 159.2 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 14.22 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03326/0.2859, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 14.35 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01679/0.3027, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 2.027 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001047/0.3038, allocations: 59.62 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 1.969 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002444/0.3063, allocations: 1.111 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 0.8516 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.003899/0.3102, allocations: 2.078 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004067/0.3142, allocations: 1.861 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 12.91 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01926/0.3335, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 9.336 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008851/0.3424, allocations: 7.197 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 2.062 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01001/0.3524, allocations: 6.438 MB / 1.144 GB, free: 11.62 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009282/0.3617, allocations: 5.488 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 6.117 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001568/0.3633, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 5.367 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.006374/0.3697, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 2.141 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003174/0.3729, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 15.2 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.006195/0.3791, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 10.43 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01589/0.395, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.448e-06/0.395, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.443e-06/0.395, allocations: 4 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0001979/0.3952, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0229/0.4181, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.45 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.213e-05/0.4182, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.44 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0007686/0.419, allocations: 496.3 kB / 1.188 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002097/0.4211, allocations: 0.8808 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 14.05 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01705/0.4381, allocations: 9.344 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 4.633 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002757/0.4384, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.198 GB, free: 4.305 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0007674/0.4392, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.199 GB, free: 3.836 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.008879/0.4481, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.63 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.433e-05/0.4481, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.62 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003536/0.4485, allocations: 144 kB / 1.205 GB, free: 13.48 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.701e-05/0.4486, allocations: 103.9 kB / 1.205 GB, free: 13.38 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007127/0.4557, allocations: 4.754 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 8.613 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04779/0.5035, allocations: 33.91 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 5.051 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.3808/0.8844, allocations: 6.218 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 162 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003421/0.8878, allocations: 2.509 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 162 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.01859/0.9064, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 159 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002678/0.9092, allocations: 2.136 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 158.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.527e-06/0.9092, allocations: 0 / 1.266 GB, free: 158.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0194/0.9286, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.28 GB, free: 152.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.07e-05/0.9287, allocations: 130.5 kB / 1.28 GB, free: 152.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01302/0.9417, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 148.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0006639/0.9424, allocations: 120 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 148.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.002487/0.9449, allocations: 3.302 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 146.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001109/0.946, allocations: 0.8702 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 145.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001366/0.9474, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 144.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.293e-05/0.9474, allocations: 306 kB / 1.296 GB, free: 144.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.003377/0.9508, allocations: 3.446 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 142.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.004069/0.9549, allocations: 5.929 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 137.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.03649/0.9914, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.341 GB, free: 104.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.529e-05/0.9914, allocations: 24 kB / 1.341 GB, free: 104.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01114/1.003, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 94.41 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.164e-05/1.003, allocations: 66.64 kB / 1.351 GB, free: 94.34 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.353e-05/1.003, allocations: 86.06 kB / 1.351 GB, free: 94.26 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001092/1.004, allocations: 0.7138 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 93.52 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003663/1.007, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 92.04 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007076/1.015, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 76.57 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00704/1.022, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 75.39 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0003272/1.022, allocations: 276 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 75.12 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006579/1.029, allocations: 7.096 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 68.02 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.003832/1.032, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 60.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.03635/1.069, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 22.88 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.205e-05/1.069, allocations: 26.62 kB / 1.417 GB, free: 22.85 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01116/1.08, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 12.69 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 4.642e-05/1.08, allocations: 75.09 kB / 1.427 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.012e-05/1.08, allocations: 85.78 kB / 1.427 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00105/1.081, allocations: 0.7067 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003653/1.085, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008855/1.094, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 10.85 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0076/1.101, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 9.664 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0004357/1.102, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 9.391 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001214/1.103, allocations: 0.7416 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 8.641 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001123/1.104, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 7.973 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008205/1.112, allocations: 5.157 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 2.785 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.706e-05/1.112, allocations: 34.38 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 2.754 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.002e-05/1.112, allocations: 4 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 2.75 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005749/1.118, allocations: 3.959 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 14.75 MB / 1.029 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02133/1.139, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.164 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.066e-05/1.139, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.156 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002324/1.142, allocations: 0.6006 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 0.5547 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00119/1.143, allocations: 0.5758 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 15.96 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002359/1.143, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01212/1.155, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 484 kB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.134e-06/1.155, allocations: 4.156 kB / 1.483 GB, free: 480 kB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01064/1.166, allocations: 7.136 MB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.242 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003616/1.17, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.555 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0009608/1.171, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.434 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003766/1.174, allocations: 0.6121 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 6.82 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.000383/1.175, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 6.656 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001819/1.175, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 6.574 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01088/1.186, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.01e-07/1.186, allocations: 0 / 1.5 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01055/1.196, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 11.32 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01123/1.208, allocations: 8.19 MB / 1.512 GB, free: 3.117 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02622/1.234, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 0.9922 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.206e-06/1.234, allocations: 4 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 0.9883 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004237/1.238, allocations: 3.051 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01115/1.249, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.535 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1254/1.375, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006401/1.381, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.639 GB, free: 9.062 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01302/1.394, allocations: 6.443 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 2.629 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004669/1.399, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 15.64 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 5.31e-07/1.399, allocations: 0 / 1.648 GB, free: 15.64 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 8.987/10.39, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.851 GB, free: 353.5 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 20.42/30.81, allocations: 7.281 kB / 1.851 GB, free: 353.5 MB / 1.295 GB (rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=400 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)