Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001506/0.001506, allocations: 108 kB / 15.61 MB, free: 152 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001759/0.001758, allocations: 194.8 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.699 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.302/1.302, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.375 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.432/2.432, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7104 GB, free: 5.078 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001397/0.001397, allocations: 67.89 kB / 0.8694 GB, free: 4.555 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.601/0.6025, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.465 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.02659/0.6291, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 2.578 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01893/0.648, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.25 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003178/0.6513, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.061 GB, free: 6.191 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003219/0.6545, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 5.078 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00487/0.6594, allocations: 2.077 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 2.992 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004102/0.6635, allocations: 1.863 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 1.137 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01747/0.681, allocations: 19.53 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 13.56 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01046/0.6915, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.092 GB, free: 6.293 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01202/0.7036, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 15.86 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009408/0.713, allocations: 5.492 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 10.35 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002775/0.7158, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 9.598 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008546/0.7244, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.367 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005286/0.7297, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 3.426 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01209/0.7418, allocations: 4.741 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02238/0.7643, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.783e-06/0.7643, allocations: 4 kB / 1.13 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.104e-06/0.7643, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003272/0.7647, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02957/0.7942, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.691 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.603e-05/0.7943, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.684 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002047/0.7964, allocations: 0.4963 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.176 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004096/0.8005, allocations: 0.8808 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 2.285 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02134/0.8218, allocations: 9.354 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 8.855 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003552/0.8222, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 8.523 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001959/0.8242, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 8.055 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01393/0.8382, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.859 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001496/0.8383, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.852 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001034/0.8394, allocations: 144 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.711 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001131/0.8395, allocations: 103.9 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.609 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009445/0.849, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 12.84 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05988/0.9089, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.196 GB, free: 9.285 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01203/0.921, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 2.953 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004275/0.9253, allocations: 2.502 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 460 kB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0288/0.9541, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 2.668 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003877/0.958, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 0.5078 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.27e-06/0.9581, allocations: 0 / 1.219 GB, free: 0.5078 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02839/0.9865, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.305 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.411e-05/0.9866, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.156 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01919/1.006, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 7.727 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009867/1.007, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.243 GB, free: 7.605 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004335/1.011, allocations: 3.297 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 4.285 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002104/1.013, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 3.402 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002119/1.015, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 2.188 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001013/1.015, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.887 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.4796/1.495, allocations: 3.449 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 207.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008401/1.504, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 204.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06175/1.565, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 188.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0002156/1.566, allocations: 23.5 kB / 1.294 GB, free: 188.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01922/1.585, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 179.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002159/1.585, allocations: 72.2 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 179.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001996/1.585, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 179.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00169/1.587, allocations: 0.7083 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 179 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005103/1.592, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 177.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009173/1.601, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 162.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009082/1.61, allocations: 1.173 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 160.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001249/1.612, allocations: 280 kB / 1.322 GB, free: 160.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01007/1.622, allocations: 7.077 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005825/1.628, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 146.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0499/1.678, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 108.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.076e-05/1.678, allocations: 27.67 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 108.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01523/1.693, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.59 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.172e-05/1.693, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001201/1.693, allocations: 86.95 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.44 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001483/1.695, allocations: 0.7175 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 97.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004704/1.699, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 96.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008563/1.708, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 80.79 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00853/1.717, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009853/1.718, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.34 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001904/1.719, allocations: 0.7644 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 78.62 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002077/1.722, allocations: 0.6617 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 78.31 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008176/1.73, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.13 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.497e-05/1.73, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.715e-05/1.73, allocations: 4 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004923/1.735, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 69.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02897/1.764, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.747e-05/1.764, allocations: 0 / 1.421 GB, free: 55.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.003969/1.768, allocations: 0.6009 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 54.92 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.002243/1.77, allocations: 0.5861 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 54.31 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006168/1.771, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.423 GB, free: 54.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01506/1.786, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 38.82 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.362e-06/1.786, allocations: 8.062 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 38.81 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01782/1.804, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 31.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006457/1.81, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003008/1.813, allocations: 131.1 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.79 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.008342/1.822, allocations: 0.6083 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0008794/1.823, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.01 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005433/1.823, allocations: 79.95 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 28.93 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01314/1.836, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 21.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.7e-07/1.836, allocations: 0 / 1.453 GB, free: 21.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01579/1.852, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 17.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01233/1.864, allocations: 8.186 MB / 1.465 GB, free: 9.469 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02706/1.892, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 7.34 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.398e-06/1.892, allocations: 4 kB / 1.483 GB, free: 7.336 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004721/1.896, allocations: 3.039 MB / 1.486 GB, free: 4.211 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01566/1.912, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 1.32 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1526/2.065, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 4.887 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007503/2.072, allocations: 5.376 MB / 1.592 GB, free: 15.48 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01538/2.088, allocations: 6.445 MB / 1.598 GB, free: 9.043 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006414/2.094, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.601 GB, free: 6.062 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.12e-07/2.094, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.601 GB, free: 6.059 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.785/2.879, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.804 GB, free: 374.6 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 13.93/16.81, allocations: 14.06 kB / 1.804 GB, free: 374.6 MB / 1.248 GB
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)