Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001543/0.001544, allocations: 108 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 132 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001803/0.001804, allocations: 193.1 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.391 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.378/1.378, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.406 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.677/2.677, allocations: 469.4 MB / 0.742 GB, free: 7.699 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001298/0.001298, allocations: 70.31 kB / 0.9083 GB, free: 34.47 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2763/0.2776, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 14.51 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03157/0.3092, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 14.62 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01734/0.3266, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 2.293 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00188/0.3285, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 2.238 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003069/0.3316, allocations: 1.115 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 1.117 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005831/0.3375, allocations: 2.076 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 15.03 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005133/0.3426, allocations: 1.846 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 13.19 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01909/0.3617, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 9.609 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008738/0.3705, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 2.332 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01035/0.3809, allocations: 6.435 MB / 1.144 GB, free: 11.89 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.00815/0.389, allocations: 5.488 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 6.383 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002374/0.3914, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 5.633 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007589/0.399, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.153 GB, free: 2.406 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.00599/0.405, allocations: 2.925 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 15.47 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01024/0.4153, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 10.7 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01785/0.4332, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.953e-06/0.4332, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.084e-06/0.4332, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000399/0.4336, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02844/0.4621, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.73 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.792e-05/0.4622, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.72 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001539/0.4637, allocations: 0.4925 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.22 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003649/0.4674, allocations: 0.8769 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 14.33 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01938/0.4868, allocations: 9.357 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 4.906 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003161/0.4871, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.198 GB, free: 4.582 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00147/0.4886, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.198 GB, free: 4.109 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01109/0.4997, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.91 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001034/0.4998, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.9 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007311/0.5006, allocations: 144 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.76 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.34e-05/0.5007, allocations: 95.94 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.66 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008776/0.5094, allocations: 4.77 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 8.883 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05474/0.5642, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 5.324 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.4802/1.044, allocations: 6.225 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 162.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004296/1.049, allocations: 2.507 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 162.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02446/1.073, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 159.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003543/1.077, allocations: 2.133 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 158.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.913e-06/1.077, allocations: 1.219 kB / 1.266 GB, free: 158.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02977/1.107, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 153 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.761e-05/1.107, allocations: 130.8 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 152.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0201/1.127, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 149.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009363/1.128, allocations: 118.3 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 149.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004983/1.133, allocations: 3.304 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 146.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002189/1.135, allocations: 0.871 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 145.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002581/1.138, allocations: 1.212 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 145.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.578e-05/1.138, allocations: 310.6 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 144.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004046/1.142, allocations: 3.45 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 143 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005204/1.147, allocations: 5.934 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 138 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04718/1.194, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 105.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.593e-05/1.194, allocations: 24 kB / 1.34 GB, free: 105.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01516/1.21, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 94.96 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001098/1.21, allocations: 70.69 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 94.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001252/1.21, allocations: 84 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 94.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001412/1.211, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 94.07 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004973/1.216, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 92.59 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008688/1.225, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 77.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009104/1.234, allocations: 1.179 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 75.93 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001067/1.235, allocations: 278.5 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 75.66 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009884/1.245, allocations: 7.092 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 68.56 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005217/1.25, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 61.43 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04396/1.294, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 23.43 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.158e-05/1.294, allocations: 35.98 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 23.39 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01515/1.31, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 13.23 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.546e-05/1.31, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.426 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001284/1.31, allocations: 84 kB / 1.426 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001535/1.311, allocations: 0.713 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 12.34 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00531/1.317, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0105/1.327, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 11.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00974/1.337, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 10.21 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001149/1.338, allocations: 271.9 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 9.941 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002004/1.34, allocations: 0.7612 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 9.176 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002612/1.343, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.508 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01097/1.354, allocations: 5.147 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.45e-05/1.354, allocations: 31.92 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.293 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.843e-05/1.354, allocations: 4 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.289 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006138/1.36, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 1.029 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02921/1.389, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.699 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.174e-05/1.389, allocations: 4 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.695 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002729/1.392, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.09 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001497/1.394, allocations: 0.5678 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 0.5 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004137/1.394, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 372 kB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01231/1.406, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 1.008 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.58e-06/1.406, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.483 GB, free: 1 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01221/1.419, allocations: 7.113 MB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.789 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004595/1.423, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.491 GB, free: 8.098 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002123/1.425, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.977 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005495/1.431, allocations: 0.6172 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.359 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004729/1.431, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.199 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000251/1.432, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.113 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01408/1.446, allocations: 7.333 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 15.79 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.4e-07/1.446, allocations: 0 / 1.5 GB, free: 15.79 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01655/1.462, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 11.86 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01442/1.477, allocations: 8.191 MB / 1.511 GB, free: 3.66 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02854/1.505, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 1.523 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.929e-06/1.505, allocations: 4 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 1.52 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004708/1.51, allocations: 3.05 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0143/1.524, allocations: 2.942 MB / 1.535 GB, free: 11.5 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1504/1.675, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.633 GB, free: 15.02 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007723/1.682, allocations: 5.381 MB / 1.638 GB, free: 9.59 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01671/1.699, allocations: 6.457 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 3.145 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006839/1.706, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 172 kB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.62e-07/1.706, allocations: 0 / 1.648 GB, free: 172 kB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.8669/2.573, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.85 GB, free: 353.9 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 13.6/16.17, allocations: 15.44 kB / 1.85 GB, free: 353.9 MB / 1.295 GB (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches