Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00116/0.00116, allocations: 108 kB / 15.61 MB, free: 152 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001179/0.001179, allocations: 194.6 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.664 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.317/1.317, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.398 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.702/2.702, allocations: 469.4 MB / 0.742 GB, free: 7.648 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001272/0.001272, allocations: 66.56 kB / 0.9083 GB, free: 34.36 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2723/0.2736, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03109/0.3047, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 14.59 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01723/0.322, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 2.273 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001941/0.324, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 2.219 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00312/0.3271, allocations: 1.119 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 1.094 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00567/0.3328, allocations: 2.078 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 15.01 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004683/0.3375, allocations: 1.851 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01734/0.3549, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 9.582 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008523/0.3635, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 2.305 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01105/0.3745, allocations: 6.443 MB / 1.144 GB, free: 11.86 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009002/0.3836, allocations: 5.488 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 6.355 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002212/0.3858, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 5.605 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007885/0.3937, allocations: 3.219 MB / 1.153 GB, free: 2.383 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004302/0.398, allocations: 2.929 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 15.45 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.007518/0.4056, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 10.68 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01576/0.4213, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.004e-06/0.4214, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.563e-06/0.4214, allocations: 4 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003951/0.4218, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02743/0.4492, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.441e-05/0.4493, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0009782/0.4503, allocations: 0.4963 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.19 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002612/0.4529, allocations: 0.8769 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 14.3 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01843/0.4713, allocations: 9.34 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 4.887 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002389/0.4716, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.198 GB, free: 4.555 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001/0.4726, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.198 GB, free: 4.086 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.008872/0.4815, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.89 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.019e-05/0.4816, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.88 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003652/0.482, allocations: 148 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.262e-05/0.4821, allocations: 103.9 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 13.63 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007097/0.4892, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 8.859 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04922/0.5384, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 5.305 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.4955/1.034, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 162.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004137/1.038, allocations: 2.508 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 162.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02327/1.061, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 159.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003462/1.065, allocations: 2.138 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 158.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.789e-06/1.065, allocations: 0 / 1.266 GB, free: 158.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03037/1.095, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 152.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.638e-05/1.095, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 152.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01709/1.113, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 149.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008138/1.113, allocations: 119 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 149.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003172/1.117, allocations: 3.295 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 146.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001434/1.118, allocations: 0.8709 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 145.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001691/1.12, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 145 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.776e-05/1.12, allocations: 310.8 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 144.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.003787/1.124, allocations: 3.444 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 143 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.004709/1.128, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 137.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04388/1.172, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 105.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.004e-05/1.172, allocations: 24 kB / 1.34 GB, free: 105.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01542/1.188, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 94.92 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.229e-05/1.188, allocations: 70.47 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 94.84 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001073/1.188, allocations: 84 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 94.76 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001454/1.189, allocations: 0.7102 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 94.03 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004827/1.194, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 92.54 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008458/1.203, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 77.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00939/1.212, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 75.89 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001076/1.213, allocations: 281.6 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 75.62 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009521/1.223, allocations: 7.083 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 68.53 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006812/1.23, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 61.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04764/1.277, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 23.38 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.994e-05/1.277, allocations: 24 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 23.36 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0166/1.294, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 13.19 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.961e-05/1.294, allocations: 69.89 kB / 1.426 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001163/1.294, allocations: 88.38 kB / 1.426 GB, free: 13.03 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001422/1.296, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 12.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004697/1.3, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 10.82 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009871/1.31, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 11.36 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009823/1.32, allocations: 1.19 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 10.16 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001225/1.321, allocations: 271.9 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 9.898 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001561/1.323, allocations: 0.7582 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 9.133 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002561/1.326, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.465 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008808/1.334, allocations: 5.149 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.285 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.53e-05/1.334, allocations: 23.94 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.262 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.363e-05/1.334, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.25 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005736/1.34, allocations: 3.955 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02512/1.365, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.66 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.179e-05/1.365, allocations: 4 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.656 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002617/1.368, allocations: 0.5932 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.062 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001459/1.369, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 472 kB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003862/1.37, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 336 kB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01266/1.382, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 0.9648 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.518e-06/1.383, allocations: 5.188 kB / 1.483 GB, free: 0.9609 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0119/1.394, allocations: 7.117 MB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.746 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004859/1.399, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.491 GB, free: 8.062 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002149/1.401, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.938 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00521/1.407, allocations: 0.616 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.32 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.00043/1.407, allocations: 165.6 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.16 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002149/1.407, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.078 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01276/1.42, allocations: 7.337 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 15.75 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7.01e-07/1.42, allocations: 0 / 1.5 GB, free: 15.75 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01487/1.435, allocations: 3.959 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01286/1.448, allocations: 8.18 MB / 1.511 GB, free: 3.625 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03109/1.479, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 1.488 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.048e-05/1.479, allocations: 7.875 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 1.48 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004839/1.484, allocations: 3.054 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 14.33 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01597/1.5, allocations: 2.946 MB / 1.535 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1391/1.639, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.633 GB, free: 14.97 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005925/1.645, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.638 GB, free: 9.555 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01417/1.659, allocations: 6.451 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 3.117 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005466/1.665, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 140 kB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.62e-07/1.665, allocations: 0 / 1.648 GB, free: 140 kB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 1.131/2.795, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.85 GB, free: 353.7 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 13.64/16.44, allocations: 12.66 kB / 1.85 GB, free: 353.7 MB / 1.295 GB
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate  --output-file Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches