Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001619/0.001619, allocations: 108 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 132 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001866/0.001866, allocations: 192.7 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.391 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.361/1.361, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.402 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.297/2.297, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.6647 GB, free: 460 kB / 0.5137 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001309/0.001309, allocations: 67.89 kB / 0.8126 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 0.67 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5203/0.5216, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9497 GB, free: 9.176 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02781/0.5495, allocations: 31.76 MB / 0.9807 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01672/0.5662, allocations: 12.28 MB / 0.9927 GB, free: 5.68 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001855/0.5681, allocations: 63.62 kB / 0.9928 GB, free: 5.617 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002812/0.571, allocations: 1.096 MB / 0.9939 GB, free: 4.516 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004848/0.5759, allocations: 2.083 MB / 0.9959 GB, free: 2.426 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004294/0.5802, allocations: 1.867 MB / 0.9977 GB, free: 0.5664 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.0174/0.5976, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 12.98 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.00861/0.6062, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 5.715 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01026/0.6165, allocations: 6.426 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.00829/0.6248, allocations: 5.492 MB / 1.035 GB, free: 9.773 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002668/0.6275, allocations: 0.7539 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 9.02 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007533/0.635, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 5.789 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002798/0.6378, allocations: 2.929 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 2.852 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.005274/0.6431, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 14.07 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01308/0.6562, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.509e-06/0.6562, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.766e-06/0.6563, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0001907/0.6565, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.062 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02287/0.6793, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.121 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.69e-05/0.6794, allocations: 16.03 kB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.105 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0007696/0.6802, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 2.605 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002102/0.6823, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 1.715 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01659/0.6989, allocations: 9.359 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 8.281 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002116/0.6991, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.957 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0008196/0.6999, allocations: 487.7 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.48 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.008373/0.7083, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.281 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.46e-05/0.7084, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.27 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003579/0.7088, allocations: 143.9 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.129 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.639e-05/0.7089, allocations: 103.9 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.027 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006876/0.7158, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.26 MB / 0.8575 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04699/0.7628, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 8.707 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01086/0.7736, allocations: 6.215 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 2.387 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003364/0.777, allocations: 2.507 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 15.87 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02037/0.7974, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 2.086 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002802/0.8002, allocations: 2.13 MB / 1.152 GB, free: 15.93 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.818e-06/0.8003, allocations: 0 / 1.152 GB, free: 15.93 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02143/0.8217, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 1.734 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.915e-05/0.8218, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.165 GB, free: 1.582 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01434/0.8361, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 7.156 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0005568/0.8367, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 7.035 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00329/0.84, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 3.711 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001325/0.8413, allocations: 0.8668 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.832 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00164/0.843, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 1.609 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 7.726e-05/0.8431, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 1.309 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004552/0.8476, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005878/0.8535, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.19 GB, free: 6.699 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05137/0.9049, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.6133 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.729e-05/0.905, allocations: 24 kB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.5898 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01564/0.9206, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.418 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.523e-05/0.9207, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.348 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.73e-05/0.9208, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.262 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001583/0.9224, allocations: 0.7126 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 5.527 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004917/0.9274, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 4.047 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01145/0.9388, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008288/0.9471, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 3.383 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0006964/0.9478, allocations: 276 kB / 1.254 GB, free: 3.113 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.3724/1.32, allocations: 7.085 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 272.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005677/1.326, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 269 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04524/1.371, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 252 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.93e-05/1.371, allocations: 31.34 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 252 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01211/1.383, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.537e-05/1.384, allocations: 75.25 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.755e-05/1.384, allocations: 88 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00117/1.385, allocations: 0.7045 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 242.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004136/1.389, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 241.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0078/1.397, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 225.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007842/1.405, allocations: 1.18 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0004589/1.405, allocations: 280 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.4 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0009682/1.406, allocations: 0.7591 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 223.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001187/1.407, allocations: 0.6611 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 223.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006805/1.414, allocations: 5.154 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 218.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.611e-05/1.414, allocations: 20 kB / 1.337 GB, free: 218.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 9.788e-06/1.414, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.337 GB, free: 218.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004395/1.418, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 214.1 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01694/1.435, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 200.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.276e-06/1.435, allocations: 352 / 1.354 GB, free: 200.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002315/1.438, allocations: 0.6046 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 200 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.000991/1.439, allocations: 0.5717 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 199.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002052/1.439, allocations: 139.5 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 199.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007741/1.447, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 184 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.896e-06/1.447, allocations: 11.97 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 183.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.008259/1.455, allocations: 7.12 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 177.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003097/1.458, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 175.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0009089/1.459, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 175.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003907/1.463, allocations: 0.6199 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003672/1.463, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001685/1.464, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.008722/1.472, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.386 GB, free: 167.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.9e-07/1.472, allocations: 0 / 1.386 GB, free: 167.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.009697/1.482, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 163.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.009132/1.491, allocations: 8.19 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 155 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02228/1.513, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 136.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 6.493e-06/1.513, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 136.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003378/1.517, allocations: 3.05 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 133.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01085/1.528, allocations: 2.94 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 130.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.09459/1.622, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 22.41 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004319/1.627, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 17 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01133/1.638, allocations: 6.447 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 10.56 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003675/1.642, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.534 GB, free: 7.586 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.783e-06/1.642, allocations: 0 / 1.534 GB, free: 7.586 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.6904/2.332, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.8 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 13.54/15.87, allocations: 17.44 kB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.8 MB / 1.17 GB (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches