Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001659/0.001659, allocations: 108 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 132 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001981/0.001981, allocations: 194.6 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.391 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.407/1.407, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.414 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.527/2.527, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7104 GB, free: 5.098 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001352/0.001352, allocations: 63.91 kB / 0.8693 GB, free: 4.57 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5418/0.5431, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.492 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03246/0.5756, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 2.605 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01716/0.5928, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.285 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002686/0.5955, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.223 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004395/0.5999, allocations: 1.103 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 5.113 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006761/0.6068, allocations: 2.08 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 3.023 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005195/0.612, allocations: 1.849 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 1.18 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01927/0.6313, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009582/0.6409, allocations: 7.197 MB / 1.092 GB, free: 6.332 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01101/0.6519, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 15.9 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009008/0.661, allocations: 5.492 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00252/0.6635, allocations: 0.7538 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 9.633 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00875/0.6723, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.406 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004567/0.6769, allocations: 2.926 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 3.473 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008943/0.6859, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01805/0.7039, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.557e-06/0.704, allocations: 4 kB / 1.13 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.613e-06/0.704, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004142/0.7044, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02887/0.7333, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.734 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.582e-05/0.7334, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.727 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001571/0.7349, allocations: 0.4924 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.223 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003687/0.7386, allocations: 0.8808 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 2.332 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02009/0.7587, allocations: 9.357 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 8.898 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003324/0.7591, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 8.57 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001623/0.7607, allocations: 479.7 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 8.102 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0114/0.7722, allocations: 5.967 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.902 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001176/0.7723, allocations: 15.86 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.887 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007242/0.773, allocations: 144 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.746 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.874e-05/0.7732, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.656 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008084/0.7812, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 12.88 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05441/0.8357, allocations: 33.91 MB / 1.196 GB, free: 9.324 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01199/0.8477, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 2.988 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003915/0.8516, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 492 kB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02429/0.876, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 2.707 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003402/0.8794, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 0.5469 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.978e-06/0.8794, allocations: 4 kB / 1.219 GB, free: 0.543 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02804/0.9075, allocations: 14 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.355 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.297e-05/0.9076, allocations: 140.7 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.195 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01889/0.9265, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 7.773 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007869/0.9273, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.243 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004073/0.9314, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 4.328 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001812/0.9332, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 3.445 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002259/0.9355, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 2.223 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 8.641e-05/0.9356, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.922 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.4555/1.391, allocations: 3.446 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 207.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007487/1.399, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 204 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05229/1.451, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 188.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.000112/1.451, allocations: 23.38 kB / 1.294 GB, free: 188.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01464/1.466, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 179.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.716e-05/1.466, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 179.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.281e-05/1.466, allocations: 88.16 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 179.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001338/1.467, allocations: 0.7045 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 179.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004687/1.472, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 177.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008341/1.48, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 162.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008666/1.489, allocations: 1.173 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 161 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009877/1.49, allocations: 276 kB / 1.322 GB, free: 160.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008535/1.499, allocations: 7.088 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.004631/1.503, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 146.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04357/1.547, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 108.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.573e-05/1.547, allocations: 24 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 108.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01329/1.56, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.65 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.618e-05/1.56, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.58 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.082e-05/1.56, allocations: 86.95 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001278/1.562, allocations: 0.7129 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 97.77 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004578/1.566, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 96.29 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008321/1.575, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 80.86 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0084/1.583, allocations: 1.179 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0007697/1.584, allocations: 283.9 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001227/1.585, allocations: 0.7652 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 78.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001448/1.586, allocations: 0.6624 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 78.38 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006925/1.593, allocations: 5.14 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.893e-05/1.593, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 9.748e-06/1.593, allocations: 4 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.17 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004586/1.598, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 69.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01986/1.618, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.838e-06/1.618, allocations: 4 kB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.59 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002338/1.62, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 54.99 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001223/1.622, allocations: 0.5822 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 54.39 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002565/1.622, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.423 GB, free: 54.26 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008086/1.63, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 38.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.647e-06/1.63, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 38.89 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.00893/1.639, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 31.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003564/1.642, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.99 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001119/1.644, allocations: 131.1 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.87 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004048/1.648, allocations: 0.6083 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.26 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003772/1.648, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.09 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001889/1.648, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.01 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.009631/1.658, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 21.69 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.51e-07/1.658, allocations: 0 / 1.453 GB, free: 21.69 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0115/1.669, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 17.76 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.009598/1.679, allocations: 8.194 MB / 1.465 GB, free: 9.543 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02577/1.705, allocations: 17.99 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 7.41 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.081e-05/1.705, allocations: 0 / 1.483 GB, free: 7.41 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004532/1.709, allocations: 3.036 MB / 1.486 GB, free: 4.289 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01341/1.723, allocations: 2.942 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 1.398 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1328/1.856, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 4.977 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006248/1.862, allocations: 5.38 MB / 1.592 GB, free: 15.56 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01458/1.876, allocations: 6.441 MB / 1.598 GB, free: 9.129 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007182/1.884, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.601 GB, free: 6.145 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.31e-07/1.884, allocations: 0 / 1.601 GB, free: 6.145 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.7694/2.653, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.804 GB, free: 374.7 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 13.61/16.27, allocations: 15.03 kB / 1.804 GB, free: 374.7 MB / 1.248 GB
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate  --output-file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches