Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 8.1.4 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001442/0.001449, allocations: 107.2 kB / 16.27 MB, free: 5.98 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001485/0.001485, allocations: 188.9 kB / 17.19 MB, free: 5.605 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.471/1.471, allocations: 205.1 MB / 223.1 MB, free: 12.28 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo): time 1.781/1.781, allocations: 292.3 MB / 0.5495 GB, free: 17.56 MB / 462.1 MB
Notification: Modelica requested package Complex of version 3.2.3. Complex 4.0.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed.
Notification: Modelica requested package ModelicaServices of version 3.2.3. ModelicaServices 4.0.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed.
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002029/0.002029, allocations: 67.91 kB / 0.6722 GB, free: 6.535 MB / 0.545 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2717/0.2737, allocations: 114.6 MB / 0.784 GB, free: 3.863 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.5056/0.7794, allocations: 31.73 MB / 0.815 GB, free: 30.17 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02023/0.7996, allocations: 12.22 MB / 0.8269 GB, free: 21.55 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003933/0.8036, allocations: 57.19 kB / 0.827 GB, free: 21.53 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004275/0.808, allocations: 1.113 MB / 0.8281 GB, free: 20.93 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.008505/0.8166, allocations: 2.062 MB / 0.8301 GB, free: 19.73 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007137/0.8237, allocations: 1.843 MB / 0.8319 GB, free: 18.83 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02535/0.8491, allocations: 19.46 MB / 0.8509 GB, free: 10.68 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01251/0.8616, allocations: 7.202 MB / 0.8579 GB, free: 7.656 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01614/0.8778, allocations: 6.43 MB / 0.8642 GB, free: 4.469 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01221/0.8901, allocations: 5.486 MB / 0.8696 GB, free: 1.168 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004115/0.8942, allocations: 0.753 MB / 0.8703 GB, free: 1.164 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01188/0.9061, allocations: 3.224 MB / 0.8735 GB, free: 15.42 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006655/0.9128, allocations: 2.926 MB / 0.8763 GB, free: 12.48 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.0141/0.927, allocations: 4.749 MB / 0.8809 GB, free: 7.715 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.027/0.954, allocations: 15.3 MB / 0.8959 GB, free: 8.367 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.306e-06/0.9541, allocations: 2.25 kB / 0.8959 GB, free: 8.367 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.923e-06/0.9541, allocations: 0 / 0.8959 GB, free: 8.367 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005693/0.9547, allocations: 0 / 0.8959 GB, free: 8.367 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03851/0.9932, allocations: 11.47 MB / 0.9071 GB, free: 12.79 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.995e-05/0.9933, allocations: 8.031 kB / 0.9071 GB, free: 12.78 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005306/0.9986, allocations: 0.8764 MB / 0.908 GB, free: 11.89 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02427/1.023, allocations: 9.311 MB / 0.9171 GB, free: 2.504 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004437/1.023, allocations: 334.8 kB / 0.9174 GB, free: 2.176 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002434/1.026, allocations: 479.8 kB / 0.9178 GB, free: 1.707 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01561/1.041, allocations: 5.968 MB / 0.9237 GB, free: 11.5 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001928/1.042, allocations: 11.88 kB / 0.9237 GB, free: 11.49 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001339/1.043, allocations: 147.9 kB / 0.9238 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001397/1.043, allocations: 95.98 kB / 0.9239 GB, free: 11.25 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.0107/1.054, allocations: 4.759 MB / 0.9285 GB, free: 6.48 MB / 0.7169 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07106/1.125, allocations: 33.87 MB / 0.9616 GB, free: 2.957 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01334/1.138, allocations: 6.224 MB / 0.9677 GB, free: 12.63 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00465/1.143, allocations: 2.51 MB / 0.9702 GB, free: 10.12 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03079/1.174, allocations: 13.23 MB / 0.9831 GB, free: 12.34 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004438/1.178, allocations: 2.131 MB / 0.9852 GB, free: 10.19 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.212e-06/1.178, allocations: 8 kB / 0.9852 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03709/1.216, allocations: 13.99 MB / 0.9988 GB, free: 11.99 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001582/1.216, allocations: 136.8 kB / 0.999 GB, free: 11.84 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0283/1.244, allocations: 10.39 MB / 1.009 GB, free: 1.445 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001359/1.245, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.009 GB, free: 1.328 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006461/1.252, allocations: 3.289 MB / 1.012 GB, free: 14.02 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002526/1.255, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.013 GB, free: 13.13 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004965/1.26, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.014 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001265/1.26, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.015 GB, free: 11.61 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006728/1.266, allocations: 3.452 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 8.141 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009179/1.276, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 1.008 MB / 0.8106 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0692/1.345, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001131/1.345, allocations: 27.56 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02387/1.369, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 0.7422 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001928/1.369, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 0.6641 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001958/1.369, allocations: 84 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 0.582 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002019/1.371, allocations: 0.7126 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 15.85 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006451/1.378, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.072 GB, free: 14.37 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01399/1.392, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01107/1.403, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 13.7 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00163/1.405, allocations: 276 kB / 1.087 GB, free: 13.43 MB / 0.8887 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0147/1.419, allocations: 7.078 MB / 1.094 GB, free: 6.336 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009351/1.429, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 15.2 MB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.6617/2.091, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 270.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.541e-05/2.091, allocations: 24.12 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 270.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02624/2.117, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 270.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001162/2.117, allocations: 70.14 kB / 1.146 GB, free: 270.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000227/2.117, allocations: 85.27 kB / 1.146 GB, free: 270.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001986/2.119, allocations: 0.7204 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 270.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006396/2.126, allocations: 1.48 MB / 1.148 GB, free: 269.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01474/2.141, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 258.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01229/2.153, allocations: 1.183 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 258.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001716/2.155, allocations: 277 kB / 1.164 GB, free: 258.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001977/2.157, allocations: 0.7587 MB / 1.164 GB, free: 258 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00312/2.16, allocations: 0.6598 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 258 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01186/2.172, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.17 GB, free: 256.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 4.414e-05/2.172, allocations: 26.94 kB / 1.17 GB, free: 256.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.949e-05/2.172, allocations: 10.83 kB / 1.17 GB, free: 256.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007819/2.18, allocations: 3.959 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 255.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03397/2.214, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 250.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.367e-05/2.214, allocations: 3.469 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 250.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002628/2.216, allocations: 0.6042 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 250.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001847/2.218, allocations: 0.5811 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 250 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000401/2.219, allocations: 134.2 kB / 1.188 GB, free: 249.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01177/2.23, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 238.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 9.427e-06/2.23, allocations: 3.406 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 238.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01262/2.243, allocations: 7.123 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 235.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005432/2.249, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 234.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00274/2.251, allocations: 125.4 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 234.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006542/2.258, allocations: 0.6188 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 234.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007447/2.259, allocations: 165.8 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 234.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003095/2.259, allocations: 85.83 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 234.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01949/2.278, allocations: 7.317 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 230.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.453e-06/2.279, allocations: 0 / 1.219 GB, free: 230.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02092/2.299, allocations: 3.956 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 230.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00236/2.302, allocations: 0.5864 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 230.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02714/2.329, allocations: 17.96 MB / 1.241 GB, free: 214.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.81e-05/2.329, allocations: 4 kB / 1.241 GB, free: 214.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004169/2.333, allocations: 3.04 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 211.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01975/2.353, allocations: 2.95 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 209 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03132/2.384, allocations: 19.15 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 189.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004961/2.389, allocations: 5.361 MB / 1.271 GB, free: 184.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002945/2.392, allocations: 455.3 kB / 1.271 GB, free: 184 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.202e-06/2.392, allocations: 3.391 kB / 1.271 GB, free: 184 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.044/3.436, allocations: 476.2 MB / 1.736 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.9669 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)