Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001552/0.001552, allocations: 102.9 kB / 16.27 MB, free: 5.996 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001539/0.001539, allocations: 186.3 kB / 17.2 MB, free: 5.605 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.445/1.445, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.9 MB, free: 15.28 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.759/2.759, allocations: 469.8 MB / 0.743 GB, free: 3.406 MB / 0.6075 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002024/0.002025, allocations: 66.91 kB / 0.9092 GB, free: 13.9 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3929/0.395, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.7432/1.138, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 5.656 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02226/1.161, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 12.97 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.004146/1.165, allocations: 57.84 kB / 1.108 GB, free: 12.95 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004844/1.17, allocations: 1.101 MB / 1.109 GB, free: 12.37 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.009474/1.179, allocations: 2.086 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 11.15 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007808/1.187, allocations: 1.855 MB / 1.113 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.03014/1.217, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 2.031 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01662/1.234, allocations: 7.204 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01807/1.252, allocations: 6.435 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 12.89 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01423/1.266, allocations: 5.493 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 10.05 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00368/1.27, allocations: 0.7494 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 10.05 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01272/1.283, allocations: 3.219 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 8.613 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007009/1.29, allocations: 2.925 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 6.613 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01621/1.306, allocations: 4.747 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 3.398 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02906/1.335, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 6.363 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.476e-06/1.335, allocations: 0 / 1.177 GB, free: 6.363 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.134e-06/1.335, allocations: 0 / 1.177 GB, free: 6.363 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005214/1.336, allocations: 0 / 1.177 GB, free: 6.363 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03949/1.375, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.232e-05/1.375, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.188 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005212/1.38, allocations: 0.8851 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 9.852 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02741/1.408, allocations: 9.352 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 428 kB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000376/1.408, allocations: 338.7 kB / 1.198 GB, free: 88 kB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001828/1.41, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.199 GB, free: 15.61 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01272/1.423, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.205 GB, free: 9.414 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.82e-05/1.423, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.205 GB, free: 9.398 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004713/1.423, allocations: 143.9 kB / 1.205 GB, free: 9.262 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001154/1.424, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.205 GB, free: 9.164 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009445/1.433, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 4.387 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06694/1.5, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 0.832 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01296/1.513, allocations: 6.226 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 10.51 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004479/1.518, allocations: 2.498 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 8.008 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02859/1.546, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003738/1.55, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 8.066 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.951e-06/1.55, allocations: 8 kB / 1.266 GB, free: 8.059 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03761/1.588, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.28 GB, free: 9.859 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001158/1.588, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.28 GB, free: 9.703 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02268/1.61, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 15.28 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001134/1.612, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 15.16 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006048/1.618, allocations: 3.297 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 11.84 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.003422/1.621, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 10.95 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.005291/1.627, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 9.738 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001633/1.627, allocations: 313.1 kB / 1.296 GB, free: 9.43 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.007023/1.634, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 5.965 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009544/1.643, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 14.83 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06988/1.713, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.341 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.442e-05/1.713, allocations: 28 kB / 1.341 GB, free: 8.699 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02408/1.737, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 14.54 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001546/1.738, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.351 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002303/1.738, allocations: 84 kB / 1.351 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002332/1.74, allocations: 0.7204 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006933/1.747, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 12.16 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01881/1.766, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 12.67 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01152/1.778, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 11.49 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001461/1.779, allocations: 276 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 11.22 MB / 1.092 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01359/1.793, allocations: 7.103 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 4.109 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00847/1.801, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 12.97 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07089/1.872, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 6.957 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.578e-05/1.872, allocations: 24 kB / 1.417 GB, free: 6.934 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02162/1.894, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 12.78 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000113/1.894, allocations: 73.73 kB / 1.427 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001511/1.894, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.427 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001769/1.896, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 11.88 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005897/1.902, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01454/1.917, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01035/1.927, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 9.711 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001475/1.928, allocations: 276.1 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 9.441 MB / 1.17 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001847/1.93, allocations: 0.7495 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 8.68 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002737/1.933, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.012 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.00991/1.943, allocations: 5.158 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 2.816 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.697e-05/1.943, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 2.789 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.404e-05/1.943, allocations: 8 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 2.781 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00621/1.949, allocations: 3.954 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 1.186 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02999/1.979, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 1.148 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.127e-05/1.979, allocations: 0 / 1.468 GB, free: 1.148 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002556/1.982, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 0.5469 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001592/1.984, allocations: 0.5872 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 15.93 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003663/1.984, allocations: 139.8 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 15.8 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0136/1.997, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 436 kB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.346e-06/1.998, allocations: 0 / 1.483 GB, free: 436 kB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0132/2.011, allocations: 7.125 MB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.211 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005795/2.017, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.523 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00279/2.019, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.402 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006448/2.026, allocations: 0.6204 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 6.781 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006447/2.027, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 6.621 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002781/2.027, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 6.539 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01763/2.044, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 15.21 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.41e-07/2.045, allocations: 4 kB / 1.5 GB, free: 15.21 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02125/2.066, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 11.25 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002798/2.069, allocations: 0.5906 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 10.66 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03441/2.103, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.522 GB, free: 8.508 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.536e-05/2.103, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.522 GB, free: 8.504 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005808/2.109, allocations: 3.032 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 5.375 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0192/2.128, allocations: 2.94 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 2.492 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04434/2.173, allocations: 19.2 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 15.22 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009546/2.182, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.552 GB, free: 9.805 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003293/2.185, allocations: 447.4 kB / 1.552 GB, free: 9.367 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 3.616e-06/2.186, allocations: 4 kB / 1.552 GB, free: 9.363 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.135/3.321, allocations: 477.7 MB / 2.019 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 1.279 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches