Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001731/0.001731, allocations: 102.2 kB / 16.27 MB, free: 5.859 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001917/0.001917, allocations: 188.7 kB / 17.2 MB, free: 5.508 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.53/1.53, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.9 MB, free: 15.27 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.683/2.683, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7111 GB, free: 4.461 MB / 0.5762 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.00199/0.00199, allocations: 72.14 kB / 0.8699 GB, free: 2.176 MB / 0.6387 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3969/0.3989, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 10.62 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.04274/0.4417, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.049 GB, free: 10.72 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0211/0.4628, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.4 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002723/0.4656, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.34 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003446/0.4691, allocations: 1.115 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 13.22 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006671/0.4759, allocations: 2.075 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005727/0.4816, allocations: 1.856 MB / 1.066 GB, free: 9.293 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.6483/1.13, allocations: 19.52 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 14.65 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01399/1.144, allocations: 7.199 MB / 1.092 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01657/1.161, allocations: 6.438 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 13.3 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01435/1.175, allocations: 5.486 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 12.52 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004864/1.18, allocations: 0.7491 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 12.52 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0137/1.194, allocations: 3.224 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 12.5 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007978/1.202, allocations: 2.929 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 11.49 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01781/1.219, allocations: 4.754 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 8.602 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02842/1.248, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 2.961 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.896e-06/1.248, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.961 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.884e-06/1.248, allocations: 2.281 kB / 1.13 GB, free: 2.961 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0006333/1.249, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.961 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04622/1.295, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 11.9 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.987e-05/1.295, allocations: 12.56 kB / 1.141 GB, free: 11.89 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.006782/1.302, allocations: 0.8831 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.45 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02646/1.328, allocations: 9.355 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 6.02 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004715/1.329, allocations: 340.1 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 5.863 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.003089/1.332, allocations: 490.1 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 5.695 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0184/1.35, allocations: 5.953 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 0.6445 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001751/1.35, allocations: 18.56 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 0.6328 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001749/1.352, allocations: 144 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 0.4922 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001357/1.352, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 408 kB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01131/1.364, allocations: 4.761 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 0.8731 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.08053/1.444, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.196 GB, free: 8.469 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01671/1.461, allocations: 6.229 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 2.203 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005378/1.466, allocations: 2.505 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 15.69 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03921/1.506, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 1.977 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005119/1.511, allocations: 2.136 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.845e-06/1.511, allocations: 0 / 1.219 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.04246/1.553, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 1.645 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001041/1.554, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 1.496 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0281/1.582, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 7.078 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001424/1.583, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.957 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006362/1.589, allocations: 3.308 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.656 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002794/1.592, allocations: 0.869 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.793 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003339/1.596, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.582 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001304/1.596, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.285 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006018/1.602, allocations: 3.454 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00946/1.611, allocations: 5.937 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 6.715 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07298/1.684, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 0.9766 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.943e-05/1.684, allocations: 24 kB / 1.294 GB, free: 0.9531 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02401/1.708, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 7.301 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001206/1.709, allocations: 65.92 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 7.23 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001634/1.709, allocations: 88 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 7.145 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001925/1.711, allocations: 0.7146 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.414 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006404/1.717, allocations: 1.48 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 5.027 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01528/1.733, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 5.578 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01216/1.745, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 4.395 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00178/1.747, allocations: 276 kB / 1.322 GB, free: 4.125 MB / 1.029 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01619/1.763, allocations: 7.087 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01017/1.773, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.335 GB, free: 5.891 MB / 1.045 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07634/1.849, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 15.9 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001133/1.85, allocations: 24 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 15.88 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02808/1.878, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.723 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001748/1.878, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.648 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001896/1.878, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.562 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002155/1.88, allocations: 0.7129 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006879/1.887, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 3.344 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01499/1.902, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 3.867 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01237/1.915, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 2.684 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001929/1.917, allocations: 276 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 2.414 MB / 1.107 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002215/1.919, allocations: 0.7628 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 1.648 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003581/1.922, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 0.9766 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01298/1.935, allocations: 5.147 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.934e-05/1.935, allocations: 24 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.77 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.281e-05/1.935, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.77 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006815/1.942, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 7.762 MB / 1.123 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03744/1.98, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.639e-05/1.98, allocations: 4 kB / 1.421 GB, free: 10.17 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002676/1.983, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 9.57 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001898/1.984, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 8.969 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004116/1.985, allocations: 139.8 kB / 1.423 GB, free: 8.832 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01444/1.999, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 9.469 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.883e-06/1.999, allocations: 4 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 9.465 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01476/2.014, allocations: 7.12 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 2.254 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006996/2.021, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 0.5586 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003837/2.025, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 448 kB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007914/2.033, allocations: 0.6182 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0009497/2.034, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.66 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0006208/2.035, allocations: 87.89 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.57 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02303/2.058, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 8.25 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.142e-06/2.058, allocations: 0 / 1.453 GB, free: 8.25 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02931/2.087, allocations: 3.957 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 4.293 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003575/2.091, allocations: 0.5977 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.723 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.04076/2.132, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 1.566 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.848e-05/2.132, allocations: 0 / 1.475 GB, free: 1.566 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.007118/2.139, allocations: 3.035 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 14.44 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0237/2.162, allocations: 2.943 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 11.56 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04922/2.212, allocations: 19.19 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 8.332 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01023/2.222, allocations: 5.377 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 2.914 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003607/2.226, allocations: 447.4 kB / 1.506 GB, free: 2.477 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.233e-06/2.226, allocations: 0 / 1.506 GB, free: 2.477 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.205/3.431, allocations: 477.7 MB / 1.972 GB, free: 35.07 MB / 1.248 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches