Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001643/0.001644, allocations: 107.6 kB / 16.27 MB, free: 6.414 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00157/0.00157, allocations: 190.3 kB / 17.2 MB, free: 5.953 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.504/1.504, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.9 MB, free: 15.21 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.769/2.769, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7111 GB, free: 4.395 MB / 0.5762 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002034/0.002034, allocations: 60.69 kB / 0.8699 GB, free: 2.137 MB / 0.6387 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3944/0.3965, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 10.59 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03884/0.4354, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.049 GB, free: 10.7 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.022/0.4575, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00331/0.4608, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.32 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004341/0.4652, allocations: 1.1 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 13.22 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007879/0.4733, allocations: 2.099 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006463/0.4797, allocations: 1.851 MB / 1.066 GB, free: 9.27 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.6995/1.179, allocations: 19.52 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01527/1.195, allocations: 7.197 MB / 1.092 GB, free: 13.27 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01865/1.213, allocations: 6.441 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01366/1.227, allocations: 5.488 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 11.92 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004628/1.232, allocations: 0.7495 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 11.92 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01373/1.245, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 11.89 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007509/1.253, allocations: 2.932 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01698/1.27, allocations: 4.747 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 8.336 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03077/1.301, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 2.738 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.923e-06/1.301, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.738 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.613e-06/1.301, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.738 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0006747/1.302, allocations: 1.094 kB / 1.13 GB, free: 2.738 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04645/1.348, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.933e-05/1.348, allocations: 10.39 kB / 1.141 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.006748/1.355, allocations: 0.8789 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.23 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.03137/1.386, allocations: 9.36 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 5.805 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004689/1.387, allocations: 335.9 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 5.648 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.003165/1.39, allocations: 487.5 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 5.484 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01649/1.406, allocations: 5.959 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 416 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.478e-05/1.407, allocations: 10.66 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 412 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000556/1.407, allocations: 151.1 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 264 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001384/1.407, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 172 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01036/1.418, allocations: 4.761 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 11.45 MB / 0.8731 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0743/1.492, allocations: 33.89 MB / 1.196 GB, free: 8.238 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01385/1.506, allocations: 6.237 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 1.965 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004788/1.511, allocations: 2.513 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 15.45 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03248/1.543, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 1.742 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003918/1.547, allocations: 2.132 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.997e-06/1.547, allocations: 0 / 1.219 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03993/1.587, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 1.414 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001026/1.587, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 1.262 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02726/1.615, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 6.844 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001646/1.616, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.727 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.007048/1.623, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.426 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.003227/1.627, allocations: 0.8691 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.562 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003661/1.63, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.344 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001452/1.631, allocations: 303.8 kB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.047 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006482/1.637, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 13.58 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01029/1.647, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 6.484 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07584/1.723, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 0.7422 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.903e-05/1.723, allocations: 24 kB / 1.294 GB, free: 0.7188 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02525/1.749, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 7.074 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001526/1.749, allocations: 77.69 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 6.992 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001736/1.749, allocations: 84 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 6.91 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002064/1.751, allocations: 0.7116 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.184 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006381/1.757, allocations: 1.481 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 4.793 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01491/1.772, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 5.371 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01191/1.784, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 4.191 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001784/1.786, allocations: 276 kB / 1.322 GB, free: 3.922 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01615/1.802, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 12.82 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01016/1.813, allocations: 5.934 MB / 1.335 GB, free: 5.695 MB / 1.045 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07561/1.888, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.705e-05/1.888, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 15.68 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02736/1.916, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.523 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001648/1.916, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.453 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001896/1.916, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.367 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002165/1.918, allocations: 0.7148 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.633 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006663/1.925, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 3.148 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01491/1.94, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 3.668 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01176/1.952, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 2.484 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001889/1.954, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 2.211 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003327/1.957, allocations: 0.7661 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 1.441 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003703/1.961, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 0.7695 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.0166/1.977, allocations: 5.158 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 4.416e-05/1.977, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.66 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.482e-05/1.977, allocations: 8 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.65 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.008365/1.986, allocations: 3.97 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 7.641 MB / 1.123 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04177/2.028, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.746e-05/2.028, allocations: 4 kB / 1.421 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.003015/2.031, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 9.453 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001884/2.033, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 8.852 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006852/2.033, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.423 GB, free: 8.719 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0147/2.048, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 9.352 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 8.346e-06/2.048, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 9.344 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01668/2.065, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 2.137 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.007077/2.072, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 452 kB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00393/2.076, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 328 kB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007707/2.084, allocations: 0.6125 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0009114/2.085, allocations: 172.9 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005945/2.085, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02207/2.107, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 8.137 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.91e-07/2.107, allocations: 0 / 1.453 GB, free: 8.137 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02652/2.134, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 4.172 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003601/2.137, allocations: 0.5969 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.602 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03777/2.175, allocations: 17.96 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 1.457 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 2.012e-05/2.175, allocations: 4 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 1.453 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.006134/2.181, allocations: 3.036 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 14.32 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02259/2.204, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 11.44 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04757/2.252, allocations: 19.21 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 8.207 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01171/2.263, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 2.801 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003943/2.267, allocations: 451.4 kB / 1.506 GB, free: 2.359 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.032e-06/2.267, allocations: 4 kB / 1.506 GB, free: 2.355 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.186/3.454, allocations: 477.6 MB / 1.972 GB, free: 34.52 MB / 1.248 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches