Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001558/0.001558, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001519/0.001519, allocations: 194.2 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.629 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.36/1.36, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.469 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.773/2.773, allocations: 482.4 MB / 0.7543 GB, free: 11.19 MB / 0.6075 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001952/0.001952, allocations: 62.66 kB / 0.9233 GB, free: 29.5 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3107/0.3127, allocations: 162.2 MB / 1.082 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.0329/0.3456, allocations: 31.58 MB / 1.113 GB, free: 13.94 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01731/0.363, allocations: 12.21 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 1.699 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001737/0.3647, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.125 GB, free: 1.648 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002767/0.3675, allocations: 1.003 MB / 1.126 GB, free: 0.6406 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004991/0.3726, allocations: 1.932 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00442/0.377, allocations: 1.707 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 13 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02067/0.3977, allocations: 19.81 MB / 1.148 GB, free: 9.152 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009641/0.4074, allocations: 7.185 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 1.891 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01272/0.4201, allocations: 6.718 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 11.17 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009456/0.4296, allocations: 5.715 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 5.434 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002578/0.4322, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 4.684 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008684/0.4409, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.171 GB, free: 1.449 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005219/0.4462, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 14.51 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01042/0.4566, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 9.734 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02127/0.4779, allocations: 15.33 MB / 1.194 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.236e-06/0.478, allocations: 0 / 1.194 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.713e-06/0.478, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.194 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000422/0.4784, allocations: 0 / 1.194 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03134/0.5098, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.205 GB, free: 14.76 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.779e-05/0.5098, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.205 GB, free: 14.75 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004563/0.5144, allocations: 0.8771 MB / 1.206 GB, free: 13.86 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02251/0.5369, allocations: 9.443 MB / 1.215 GB, free: 4.352 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000465/0.5374, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.216 GB, free: 4.02 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001847/0.5393, allocations: 475.8 kB / 1.216 GB, free: 3.555 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01255/0.5518, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 13.35 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.099e-05/0.552, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 13.34 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004176/0.5524, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 13.2 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001035/0.5525, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 13.11 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008157/0.5607, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.227 GB, free: 8.336 MB / 0.9825 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.5319/1.093, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 141.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01141/1.104, allocations: 6.229 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 139.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003648/1.108, allocations: 2.496 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 138.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02497/1.133, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.281 GB, free: 132.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002746/1.136, allocations: 2.136 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 132 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.21e-06/1.136, allocations: 0 / 1.283 GB, free: 132 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02266/1.158, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.297 GB, free: 125.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.266e-05/1.158, allocations: 128.6 kB / 1.297 GB, free: 125.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01645/1.175, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 120.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009132/1.176, allocations: 118.7 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 120.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.002926/1.179, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.311 GB, free: 117.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001567/1.18, allocations: 0.8682 MB / 1.311 GB, free: 116.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001561/1.182, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 116 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.178e-05/1.182, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.313 GB, free: 115.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.003773/1.186, allocations: 3.458 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 114 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00445/1.19, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 108.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04125/1.231, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.358 GB, free: 72.86 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.952e-05/1.231, allocations: 28 kB / 1.358 GB, free: 72.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01642/1.248, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 62.68 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.699e-05/1.248, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 62.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001129/1.248, allocations: 84 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 62.52 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001512/1.25, allocations: 0.7087 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 61.79 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004563/1.254, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 60.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008672/1.263, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.384 GB, free: 44.83 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01017/1.273, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 43.52 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001157/1.274, allocations: 276 kB / 1.386 GB, free: 43.25 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009892/1.284, allocations: 7.087 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 36.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005436/1.29, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 29.02 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05072/1.34, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 6.996 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.824e-05/1.341, allocations: 26.5 kB / 1.434 GB, free: 6.973 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01956/1.36, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 12.82 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001206/1.36, allocations: 73.84 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 12.74 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001399/1.36, allocations: 88 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 12.65 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001808/1.362, allocations: 0.7048 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 11.93 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005561/1.368, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 10.45 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01356/1.381, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.46 GB, free: 10.95 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009496/1.391, allocations: 1.294 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 9.648 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001143/1.392, allocations: 272 kB / 1.462 GB, free: 9.383 MB / 1.045 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002111/1.394, allocations: 0.7652 MB / 1.463 GB, free: 8.609 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002636/1.397, allocations: 0.6671 MB / 1.463 GB, free: 7.934 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01015/1.407, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 2.754 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.996e-05/1.407, allocations: 24 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 2.73 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.048e-05/1.407, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 2.723 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006214/1.413, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02799/1.441, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 1.168 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.007e-05/1.441, allocations: 0 / 1.485 GB, free: 1.168 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002566/1.444, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.486 GB, free: 0.5625 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001486/1.445, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.486 GB, free: 15.96 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003125/1.446, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.487 GB, free: 15.83 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01272/1.458, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 488 kB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 7.665e-06/1.459, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.501 GB, free: 480 kB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01182/1.47, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 9.27 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004361/1.475, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 7.582 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001365/1.476, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.509 GB, free: 7.457 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004474/1.481, allocations: 0.6898 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 6.766 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004361/1.481, allocations: 173.6 kB / 1.51 GB, free: 6.594 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002127/1.481, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.51 GB, free: 6.512 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01244/1.494, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 15.24 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3e-07/1.494, allocations: 4 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 15.23 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01498/1.509, allocations: 3.953 MB / 1.521 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002232/1.511, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.522 GB, free: 10.78 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.0306/1.542, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.539 GB, free: 8.652 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.057e-05/1.542, allocations: 4 kB / 1.539 GB, free: 8.648 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004929/1.547, allocations: 3.04 MB / 1.542 GB, free: 5.516 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01517/1.562, allocations: 2.96 MB / 1.545 GB, free: 2.609 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03483/1.597, allocations: 21.12 MB / 1.566 GB, free: 13.47 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008184/1.605, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.066 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01484/1.62, allocations: 6.475 MB / 1.577 GB, free: 1.602 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002009/1.622, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.578 GB, free: 1.188 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.31e-07/1.622, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.578 GB, free: 1.18 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2373/1.859, allocations: 142.7 MB / 1.717 GB, free: 3.684 MB / 1.295 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches