Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001468/0.001468, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001516/0.001516, allocations: 194.6 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.629 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.526/1.526, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.523 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.698/2.698, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7101 GB, free: 5.254 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.003501/0.003502, allocations: 63.89 kB / 0.8687 GB, free: 5.086 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.6858/0.6894, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.738 MB / 0.7637 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.04143/0.7309, allocations: 31.53 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 3.094 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02776/0.7587, allocations: 12.23 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.832 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003462/0.7622, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.777 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004502/0.7667, allocations: 1.007 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.766 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007386/0.7742, allocations: 1.938 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 3.82 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005255/0.7794, allocations: 1.704 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 2.125 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02251/0.8019, allocations: 19.77 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 14.31 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01025/0.8122, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 7.039 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01334/0.8256, allocations: 6.642 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 404 kB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01002/0.8357, allocations: 5.73 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002038/0.8377, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 9.898 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009195/0.8469, allocations: 3.235 MB / 1.106 GB, free: 6.66 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006778/0.8538, allocations: 2.929 MB / 1.109 GB, free: 3.723 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01211/0.8659, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.114 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02969/0.8956, allocations: 15.33 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.214e-06/0.8957, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.434e-06/0.8957, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005142/0.8962, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03205/0.9283, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 3.992 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.646e-05/0.9284, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.14 GB, free: 3.98 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003848/0.9322, allocations: 0.8809 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.09 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02365/0.9559, allocations: 9.433 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 9.582 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0005828/0.9565, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002927/0.9595, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 8.789 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01502/0.9745, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.59 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001471/0.9747, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.578 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009903/0.9757, allocations: 144 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.438 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001314/0.9759, allocations: 103.9 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.336 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.0101/0.986, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 13.57 MB / 0.92 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07468/1.061, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.195 GB, free: 10.13 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01381/1.075, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 3.789 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005369/1.08, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.203 GB, free: 1.281 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03105/1.111, allocations: 13.19 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 3.547 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004504/1.116, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.218 GB, free: 1.383 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.302e-06/1.116, allocations: 0 / 1.218 GB, free: 1.383 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03887/1.155, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 3.18 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001193/1.155, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.232 GB, free: 3.027 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02402/1.179, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 8.68 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009589/1.18, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.242 GB, free: 8.555 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00558/1.185, allocations: 3.293 MB / 1.245 GB, free: 5.242 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002109/1.187, allocations: 0.8824 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.348 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003629/1.191, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.133 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001397/1.191, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.832 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.5916/1.783, allocations: 3.449 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 206.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01073/1.794, allocations: 5.937 MB / 1.257 GB, free: 203.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0614/1.855, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 188.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001942/1.855, allocations: 27.06 kB / 1.293 GB, free: 188.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02038/1.876, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002022/1.876, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001821/1.876, allocations: 88 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001635/1.878, allocations: 0.7151 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 180 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005274/1.883, allocations: 1.483 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 178.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009137/1.892, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 163.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009771/1.902, allocations: 1.31 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 161.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001368/1.903, allocations: 276 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 161.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01055/1.914, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 154.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006297/1.92, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.333 GB, free: 147.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05007/1.97, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 109.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.144e-05/1.971, allocations: 24 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 109.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01718/1.988, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001195/1.988, allocations: 70.48 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.42 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001619/1.988, allocations: 84.09 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.34 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001671/1.99, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.61 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005073/1.995, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 97.12 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009087/2.004, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 81.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009074/2.013, allocations: 1.3 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.43 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001171/2.014, allocations: 275.9 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002297/2.017, allocations: 0.7655 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.43 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002254/2.019, allocations: 0.6619 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008999/2.028, allocations: 5.145 MB / 1.403 GB, free: 73.93 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.237e-05/2.028, allocations: 35.92 kB / 1.403 GB, free: 73.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.231e-05/2.028, allocations: 4 kB / 1.403 GB, free: 73.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005061/2.033, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 69.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02782/2.061, allocations: 13.37 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 56.36 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.898e-06/2.061, allocations: 4 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 56.35 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00225/2.063, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001181/2.064, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.14 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002251/2.065, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.422 GB, free: 55.02 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008434/2.073, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.65 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.028e-06/2.073, allocations: 4 kB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.65 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01022/2.083, allocations: 7.129 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 32.44 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005102/2.088, allocations: 1.652 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 30.76 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002303/2.091, allocations: 127.8 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 30.63 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004946/2.096, allocations: 0.6917 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.95 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004532/2.096, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.78 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002114/2.096, allocations: 84.33 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01405/2.11, allocations: 7.291 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 22.42 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.223e-06/2.11, allocations: 0 / 1.452 GB, free: 22.42 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01823/2.129, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 18.51 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002417/2.131, allocations: 0.5946 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 17.98 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02573/2.157, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.85 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.01e-05/2.157, allocations: 0 / 1.474 GB, free: 15.85 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005312/2.162, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.477 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01631/2.179, allocations: 2.935 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 9.832 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04552/2.224, allocations: 21.12 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.754 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01178/2.236, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.506 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01807/2.254, allocations: 6.466 MB / 1.512 GB, free: 8.887 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00306/2.257, allocations: 423.3 kB / 1.513 GB, free: 8.473 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.42e-07/2.257, allocations: 4 kB / 1.513 GB, free: 8.469 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2599/2.517, allocations: 142.7 MB / 1.652 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 1.186 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches