Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001782/0.001782, allocations: 115.3 kB / 15.34 MB, free: 0.5156 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001961/0.001961, allocations: 190.1 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.637 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.451/1.451, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.543 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.77/2.77, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7101 GB, free: 5.289 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001912/0.001912, allocations: 67.89 kB / 0.8687 GB, free: 5.086 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5801/0.582, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.734 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03549/0.6176, allocations: 31.51 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 3.109 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01974/0.6373, allocations: 12.22 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.852 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002275/0.6397, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.797 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003163/0.6428, allocations: 1.011 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.781 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006056/0.6489, allocations: 1.933 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 3.84 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005063/0.654, allocations: 1.701 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 2.148 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02305/0.6771, allocations: 19.78 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 14.32 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01111/0.6882, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 7.051 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01507/0.7033, allocations: 6.632 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 428 kB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01046/0.7138, allocations: 5.734 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 10.66 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002763/0.7166, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 9.918 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008747/0.7254, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.106 GB, free: 6.684 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005107/0.7305, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.109 GB, free: 3.738 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01079/0.7413, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.114 GB, free: 14.96 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02326/0.7646, allocations: 15.31 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.61 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.782e-06/0.7647, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.61 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.535e-06/0.7647, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.61 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005276/0.7652, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.61 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03622/0.8015, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 4.012 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.251e-05/0.8015, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.14 GB, free: 4.004 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005032/0.8066, allocations: 0.8848 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.109 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02566/0.8323, allocations: 9.422 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 9.609 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0007311/0.8331, allocations: 338.7 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 9.277 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00276/0.8359, allocations: 483.7 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 8.805 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01713/0.853, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.609 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001669/0.8532, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.598 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001162/0.8544, allocations: 144 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.457 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001335/0.8546, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.363 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01054/0.8651, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06833/0.9335, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.195 GB, free: 10.15 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01395/0.9475, allocations: 6.235 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 3.812 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005145/0.9527, allocations: 2.502 MB / 1.203 GB, free: 1.309 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03115/0.9838, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 3.57 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004203/0.9881, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.218 GB, free: 1.41 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.99e-06/0.9881, allocations: 4 kB / 1.218 GB, free: 1.406 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03629/1.024, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 3.207 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001139/1.025, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.232 GB, free: 3.055 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02575/1.05, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 8.703 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001018/1.051, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.242 GB, free: 8.578 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005295/1.057, allocations: 3.293 MB / 1.245 GB, free: 5.262 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002302/1.059, allocations: 0.8784 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.371 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003173/1.062, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.156 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0002481/1.062, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.852 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.5481/1.611, allocations: 3.445 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 206.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008632/1.619, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.257 GB, free: 203.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05664/1.676, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 188.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001404/1.676, allocations: 23.5 kB / 1.293 GB, free: 188.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01458/1.691, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.356e-05/1.691, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001098/1.691, allocations: 89.03 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001362/1.692, allocations: 0.7113 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 180 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004632/1.697, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 178.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008346/1.705, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 163.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008771/1.714, allocations: 1.299 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 161.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009584/1.715, allocations: 280 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 161.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008642/1.724, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 154.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005071/1.729, allocations: 5.94 MB / 1.333 GB, free: 147.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04355/1.772, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 109.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.592e-05/1.773, allocations: 28 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 109.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01426/1.787, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.55 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.832e-05/1.787, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.48 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.17e-05/1.787, allocations: 84 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001329/1.788, allocations: 0.7089 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.67 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004598/1.793, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 97.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008609/1.802, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 81.76 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009414/1.811, allocations: 1.301 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.49 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001122/1.812, allocations: 280.7 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.22 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001634/1.814, allocations: 0.7614 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001949/1.816, allocations: 0.662 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007583/1.823, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.403 GB, free: 74 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.379e-05/1.823, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.403 GB, free: 73.97 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.116e-05/1.823, allocations: 5.312 kB / 1.403 GB, free: 73.96 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004632/1.828, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 69.97 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02622/1.854, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 56.42 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.401e-05/1.854, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 56.41 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002391/1.857, allocations: 0.6007 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.81 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001424/1.858, allocations: 0.5757 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003567/1.859, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.422 GB, free: 55.08 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008625/1.867, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.71 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.961e-06/1.867, allocations: 4 kB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.71 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01072/1.878, allocations: 7.128 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 32.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004579/1.883, allocations: 1.652 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 30.82 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002296/1.885, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 30.69 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005912/1.891, allocations: 0.6955 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 30 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006098/1.892, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.84 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002339/1.892, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.76 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01255/1.904, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 22.48 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.81e-07/1.904, allocations: 0 / 1.452 GB, free: 22.48 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01624/1.921, allocations: 3.949 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 18.57 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.001933/1.923, allocations: 0.597 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 18.05 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.0252/1.948, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.93 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.525e-05/1.948, allocations: 8 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.92 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005421/1.953, allocations: 3.039 MB / 1.477 GB, free: 12.79 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01681/1.97, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 9.898 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04151/2.012, allocations: 21.11 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.82 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009209/2.021, allocations: 5.376 MB / 1.506 GB, free: 15.4 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01786/2.039, allocations: 6.469 MB / 1.512 GB, free: 8.945 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002926/2.042, allocations: 419.4 kB / 1.513 GB, free: 8.535 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.393e-06/2.042, allocations: 0 / 1.513 GB, free: 8.535 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2534/2.295, allocations: 142.7 MB / 1.652 GB, free: 11.22 MB / 1.186 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches