Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001809/0.001816, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001926/0.001926, allocations: 192.2 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.617 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.361/1.361, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.504 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.738/2.738, allocations: 472.6 MB / 0.7448 GB, free: 4.871 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001228/0.001228, allocations: 66.73 kB / 0.9115 GB, free: 33.61 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2899/0.2912, allocations: 159.9 MB / 1.068 GB, free: 10.77 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03365/0.3249, allocations: 31.52 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01833/0.3432, allocations: 12.21 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 14.9 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002238/0.3455, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.11 GB, free: 14.84 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00368/0.3492, allocations: 1.011 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 13.83 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00596/0.3552, allocations: 1.945 MB / 1.113 GB, free: 11.88 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00531/0.3606, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 10.19 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02181/0.3824, allocations: 19.79 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 6.359 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009128/0.3916, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01161/0.4032, allocations: 6.633 MB / 1.148 GB, free: 8.457 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01038/0.4136, allocations: 5.734 MB / 1.153 GB, free: 2.703 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002756/0.4164, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 1.957 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008056/0.4245, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004775/0.4293, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.16 GB, free: 11.78 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01025/0.4396, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 7.012 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0206/0.4602, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.244e-06/0.4603, allocations: 0 / 1.18 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.844e-06/0.4603, allocations: 0 / 1.18 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000469/0.4608, allocations: 0 / 1.18 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03084/0.4916, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.191 GB, free: 12.06 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.552e-05/0.4917, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.191 GB, free: 12.05 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004153/0.4958, allocations: 0.8849 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 11.16 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02141/0.5173, allocations: 9.418 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 1.66 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004218/0.5177, allocations: 342.7 kB / 1.201 GB, free: 1.324 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001993/0.5197, allocations: 483.7 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 0.8516 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01503/0.5348, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001873/0.535, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.63 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001366/0.5364, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.49 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001473/0.5366, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.4 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01014/0.5467, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 5.629 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05832/0.6051, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 2.184 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.5375/1.143, allocations: 6.221 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 159.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003986/1.147, allocations: 2.505 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 159.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02608/1.173, allocations: 13.19 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 154.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003854/1.177, allocations: 2.138 MB / 1.269 GB, free: 153.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.16e-06/1.177, allocations: 0.5625 kB / 1.269 GB, free: 153.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02546/1.202, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 148.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.523e-05/1.202, allocations: 132.1 kB / 1.283 GB, free: 148.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01709/1.219, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 144.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008208/1.22, allocations: 119.2 kB / 1.293 GB, free: 144 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003058/1.223, allocations: 3.306 MB / 1.296 GB, free: 141.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00144/1.225, allocations: 0.8728 MB / 1.297 GB, free: 140.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00154/1.226, allocations: 1.216 MB / 1.298 GB, free: 139.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.669e-05/1.226, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004085/1.23, allocations: 3.444 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 137.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00509/1.235, allocations: 5.934 MB / 1.308 GB, free: 132.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04821/1.284, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 98.87 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.213e-05/1.284, allocations: 28 kB / 1.344 GB, free: 98.84 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01507/1.299, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 88.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001371/1.299, allocations: 66.64 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 88.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001679/1.299, allocations: 84 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 88.53 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001872/1.301, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 87.79 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005219/1.306, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 86.31 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008733/1.315, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 70.84 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009689/1.325, allocations: 1.31 MB / 1.371 GB, free: 69.53 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001198/1.326, allocations: 276 kB / 1.371 GB, free: 69.26 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01089/1.337, allocations: 7.078 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 62.17 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006195/1.343, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.384 GB, free: 55.04 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05166/1.395, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 17.04 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.833e-05/1.395, allocations: 28 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 17.01 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01773/1.413, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 6.844 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001172/1.413, allocations: 71.42 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 6.77 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001462/1.413, allocations: 86.25 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 6.688 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001661/1.415, allocations: 0.7168 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 5.949 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005327/1.42, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.432 GB, free: 4.473 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01122/1.431, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 4.992 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01011/1.441, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 3.684 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001421/1.443, allocations: 275.9 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 3.414 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002475/1.445, allocations: 0.7681 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 2.645 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003462/1.449, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 1.973 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01183/1.461, allocations: 5.149 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 12.79 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.111e-05/1.461, allocations: 27.88 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 12.77 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.972e-05/1.461, allocations: 8 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 12.76 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006261/1.467, allocations: 3.954 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 8.766 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02985/1.497, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.25e-05/1.497, allocations: 4.344 kB / 1.471 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002489/1.5, allocations: 0.6046 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 10.6 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001463/1.501, allocations: 0.5755 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 10 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003101/1.501, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 9.871 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01333/1.515, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.486 GB, free: 10.52 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.039e-06/1.515, allocations: 4 kB / 1.486 GB, free: 10.52 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01395/1.529, allocations: 7.117 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 3.309 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00601/1.535, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.495 GB, free: 1.625 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002905/1.538, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.495 GB, free: 1.504 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006542/1.544, allocations: 0.7015 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 0.8008 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007359/1.545, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.496 GB, free: 0.6367 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004645/1.545, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.496 GB, free: 0.5508 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01621/1.562, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 9.273 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 8.02e-07/1.562, allocations: 0 / 1.503 GB, free: 9.273 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0181/1.58, allocations: 3.941 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 5.359 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002415/1.582, allocations: 0.5959 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03112/1.613, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 2.695 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.193e-05/1.613, allocations: 0 / 1.525 GB, free: 2.695 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005485/1.619, allocations: 3.05 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.56 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02057/1.64, allocations: 2.926 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 12.68 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03734/1.677, allocations: 21.12 MB / 1.552 GB, free: 7.543 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.0129/1.69, allocations: 5.375 MB / 1.557 GB, free: 2.133 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01897/1.709, allocations: 6.475 MB / 1.563 GB, free: 11.66 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003181/1.712, allocations: 423.3 kB / 1.564 GB, free: 11.25 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.282e-06/1.712, allocations: 0 / 1.564 GB, free: 11.25 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2224/1.935, allocations: 142.7 MB / 1.703 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 1.279 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)