Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00126/0.00126, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00125/0.00125, allocations: 192.7 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.621 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.212/1.212, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.535 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.566/2.566, allocations: 461.9 MB / 0.7344 GB, free: 14.91 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001254/0.001254, allocations: 65.16 kB / 0.8987 GB, free: 37.07 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2461/0.2474, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.052 GB, free: 8.629 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02822/0.2756, allocations: 31.53 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.988 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01557/0.2912, allocations: 12.22 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.74 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001677/0.2929, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.68 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002842/0.2958, allocations: 0.9995 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004782/0.3006, allocations: 1.936 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 9.734 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004291/0.3049, allocations: 1.711 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 8.031 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01863/0.3236, allocations: 19.78 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 4.207 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008666/0.3323, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.126 GB, free: 12.94 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01085/0.3431, allocations: 6.628 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 6.309 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008248/0.3514, allocations: 5.742 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 0.5469 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00224/0.3537, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 15.79 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00701/0.3607, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 12.57 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004017/0.3647, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 9.625 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008453/0.3732, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 4.859 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01583/0.389, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.164 GB, free: 5.496 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.021e-06/0.3891, allocations: 0 / 1.164 GB, free: 5.496 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.653e-06/0.3891, allocations: 0 / 1.164 GB, free: 5.496 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000298/0.3894, allocations: 0 / 1.164 GB, free: 5.496 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02557/0.415, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.891 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.459e-05/0.415, allocations: 8.625 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.883 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001423/0.4165, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.383 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003144/0.4196, allocations: 0.8769 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 8.496 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02086/0.4405, allocations: 9.429 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 14.99 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003824/0.4409, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001732/0.4427, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.2 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01185/0.4545, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.996 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001147/0.4547, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.988 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007559/0.4554, allocations: 144 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.848 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.691e-05/0.4555, allocations: 103.9 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.746 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007923/0.4635, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 2.977 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05406/0.5176, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.231 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01158/0.5292, allocations: 6.232 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 9.203 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003669/0.5329, allocations: 2.502 MB / 1.239 GB, free: 6.695 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.4245/0.9573, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 170.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00271/0.9601, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.198e-06/0.9601, allocations: 0 / 1.254 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02191/0.982, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 167.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 4.975e-05/0.9821, allocations: 129.3 kB / 1.268 GB, free: 167.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01462/0.9967, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 165.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007373/0.9975, allocations: 126.9 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 165.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00251/1, allocations: 3.299 MB / 1.282 GB, free: 163.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001201/1.001, allocations: 0.873 MB / 1.282 GB, free: 162.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001501/1.003, allocations: 1.211 MB / 1.284 GB, free: 162.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.315e-05/1.003, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.284 GB, free: 161.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.00374/1.007, allocations: 3.452 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 161 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.004018/1.011, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 156.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.03754/1.048, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 123.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.526e-05/1.048, allocations: 31.77 kB / 1.329 GB, free: 123.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01142/1.06, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 113.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.325e-05/1.06, allocations: 69.73 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 113.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.926e-05/1.06, allocations: 84 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 113.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001159/1.061, allocations: 0.7101 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 112.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003789/1.065, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.341 GB, free: 111 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007217/1.072, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 95.48 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007471/1.079, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 94.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0003426/1.08, allocations: 280 kB / 1.357 GB, free: 93.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006794/1.087, allocations: 7.081 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 86.81 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.003922/1.091, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 79.67 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.03665/1.127, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 41.66 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.333e-05/1.127, allocations: 24 kB / 1.405 GB, free: 41.64 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01169/1.139, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 31.48 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 4.407e-05/1.139, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 31.41 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 4.967e-05/1.139, allocations: 84 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 31.32 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001091/1.14, allocations: 0.7171 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 30.59 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003749/1.144, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 29.11 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007151/1.151, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00719/1.158, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.34 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0003325/1.159, allocations: 276 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001002/1.16, allocations: 0.7585 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 11.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0008894/1.16, allocations: 0.6672 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 10.62 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.005992/1.166, allocations: 5.145 MB / 1.439 GB, free: 5.438 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.442e-05/1.167, allocations: 24 kB / 1.439 GB, free: 5.414 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 7.263e-06/1.167, allocations: 4 kB / 1.439 GB, free: 5.41 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.003956/1.17, allocations: 3.973 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 1.406 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01758/1.188, allocations: 13.37 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 3.855 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.636e-06/1.188, allocations: 4 kB / 1.456 GB, free: 3.852 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002236/1.19, allocations: 0.6048 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 3.246 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001052/1.191, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 2.648 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002178/1.192, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.458 GB, free: 2.516 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.009902/1.202, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 3.164 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.637e-06/1.202, allocations: 8.062 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 3.156 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009446/1.211, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003947/1.215, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 10.26 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001797/1.217, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.48 GB, free: 10.14 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00487/1.222, allocations: 0.6898 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.449 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.00041/1.222, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.285 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002118/1.222, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.203 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0122/1.235, allocations: 7.28 MB / 1.488 GB, free: 1.934 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.6e-07/1.235, allocations: 0 / 1.488 GB, free: 1.934 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0135/1.248, allocations: 3.954 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 14.01 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01165/1.26, allocations: 8.179 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 5.805 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02454/1.284, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.676 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 7.915e-06/1.284, allocations: 7.656 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.672 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003719/1.288, allocations: 3.046 MB / 1.521 GB, free: 0.5352 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01261/1.301, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 13.66 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3111/1.612, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.623 GB, free: 68 kB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004753/1.617, allocations: 5.383 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01174/1.628, allocations: 6.467 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 4.188 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003704/1.632, allocations: 2.971 MB / 1.637 GB, free: 1.215 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 6.71e-07/1.632, allocations: 0 / 1.637 GB, free: 1.215 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 8.684/10.32, allocations: 206.7 MB / 1.839 GB, free: 373.7 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0001759/10.32, allocations: 316 kB / 1.84 GB, free: 373.4 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 7.105/17.42, allocations: 4 kB / 1.84 GB, free: 373.4 MB / 1.295 GB
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)