Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001106/0.001106, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001422/0.001422, allocations: 188.2 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.621 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.325/1.325, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.531 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.303/2.303, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6644 GB, free: 0.5664 MB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001364/0.001364, allocations: 67.89 kB / 0.8122 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5441/0.5455, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9492 GB, free: 9.098 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.02868/0.5742, allocations: 31.53 MB / 0.98 GB, free: 15.88 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01751/0.5918, allocations: 12.21 MB / 0.992 GB, free: 5.988 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00211/0.5939, allocations: 57.69 kB / 0.992 GB, free: 5.965 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003063/0.597, allocations: 1.003 MB / 0.993 GB, free: 5.125 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005287/0.6023, allocations: 1.948 MB / 0.9949 GB, free: 3.172 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00463/0.607, allocations: 1.686 MB / 0.9965 GB, free: 1.492 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02091/0.6279, allocations: 19.8 MB / 1.016 GB, free: 13.65 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.00869/0.6366, allocations: 7.177 MB / 1.023 GB, free: 6.402 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01067/0.6473, allocations: 6.645 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 15.75 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008029/0.6553, allocations: 5.734 MB / 1.035 GB, free: 10 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002059/0.6574, allocations: 0.746 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 9.254 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.006886/0.6643, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 6.016 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003451/0.6678, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 3.074 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.006238/0.674, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.046 GB, free: 14.3 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01555/0.6896, allocations: 15.31 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.275e-06/0.6896, allocations: 4 kB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.573e-06/0.6896, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000343/0.69, allocations: 0 / 1.061 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02707/0.7171, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.344 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.058e-05/0.7171, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.332 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0009577/0.7181, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 2.832 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002398/0.7205, allocations: 0.8802 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 1.941 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01832/0.7388, allocations: 9.425 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.441 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002435/0.7391, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.113 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001057/0.7402, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.641 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009582/0.7498, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.449 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.849e-05/0.7499, allocations: 19.81 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.43 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003769/0.7502, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.285 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.122e-05/0.7503, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.191 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007566/0.7579, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.42 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0525/0.8104, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 8.988 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01179/0.8223, allocations: 6.222 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 2.66 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00372/0.826, allocations: 2.513 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 144 kB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02595/0.852, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 2.395 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003427/0.8554, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 244 kB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.959e-06/0.8555, allocations: 4 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 240 kB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02673/0.8822, allocations: 14 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 2.043 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.122e-05/0.8823, allocations: 136.7 kB / 1.165 GB, free: 1.887 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0173/0.8996, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.535 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007962/0.9005, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.414 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003635/0.9041, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 4.09 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001644/0.9058, allocations: 0.8745 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 3.203 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001861/0.9076, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 1.988 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.088e-05/0.9077, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 1.684 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004801/0.9125, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.184 GB, free: 14.22 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006271/0.9188, allocations: 5.94 MB / 1.19 GB, free: 7.074 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05566/0.9745, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.9844 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.721e-05/0.9746, allocations: 28.06 kB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.957 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01977/0.9944, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.235 GB, free: 6.797 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002207/0.9947, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.719 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0003011/0.995, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.633 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002436/0.9974, allocations: 0.7127 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 5.898 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005973/1.003, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 4.418 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01223/1.016, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 4.938 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009392/1.025, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.629 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001149/1.026, allocations: 280 kB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.355 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.4371/1.463, allocations: 7.072 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 271.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006456/1.47, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 268.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04698/1.517, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 251.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001186/1.517, allocations: 28 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 251.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01279/1.53, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 244 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.168e-05/1.53, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.404e-05/1.53, allocations: 87.89 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001248/1.531, allocations: 0.7086 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 243.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004297/1.536, allocations: 1.483 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 241.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007925/1.544, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 226.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008572/1.552, allocations: 1.298 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 225 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0007099/1.553, allocations: 280 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001096/1.554, allocations: 0.7583 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 224 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001298/1.555, allocations: 0.6604 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 223.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006571/1.562, allocations: 5.146 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.857e-05/1.562, allocations: 28 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 8.726e-06/1.562, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.0043/1.566, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 214.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01779/1.584, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 200.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.548e-06/1.584, allocations: 4.328 kB / 1.353 GB, free: 200.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002233/1.586, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 200.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001072/1.587, allocations: 0.5811 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 199.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002154/1.588, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 199.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.00761/1.595, allocations: 14.41 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 184.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.516e-06/1.595, allocations: 4 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 184.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.008485/1.604, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 177.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003586/1.607, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 175.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0009184/1.608, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 175.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003817/1.612, allocations: 0.7 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 175 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003663/1.612, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000167/1.613, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.008508/1.621, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 167.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.4e-07/1.621, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 167.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.009641/1.631, allocations: 3.946 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 163.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.009446/1.64, allocations: 8.2 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 155.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02215/1.662, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 137.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 7.975e-06/1.662, allocations: 4 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 137.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.00337/1.666, allocations: 3.046 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 134.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01109/1.677, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 131.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3311/2.008, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 21.66 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006317/2.014, allocations: 5.376 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 16.25 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01354/2.028, allocations: 6.47 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 9.793 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005644/2.034, allocations: 2.971 MB / 1.534 GB, free: 6.82 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.12e-07/2.034, allocations: 0 / 1.534 GB, free: 6.82 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.7041/2.738, allocations: 206.7 MB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.5 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0001615/2.738, allocations: 308.1 kB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.1 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 6.594/9.332, allocations: 1.406 kB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.1 MB / 1.17 GB
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)