Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001488/0.001488, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001678/0.001678, allocations: 195.9 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.629 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.432/1.432, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.531 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.363/2.363, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6644 GB, free: 0.582 MB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001338/0.001338, allocations: 63.89 kB / 0.8122 GB, free: 14.69 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.531/0.5324, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9492 GB, free: 9.234 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.0276/0.56, allocations: 31.51 MB / 0.98 GB, free: 40 kB / 0.7325 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01628/0.5763, allocations: 12.22 MB / 0.9919 GB, free: 6.137 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001811/0.5782, allocations: 52.72 kB / 0.992 GB, free: 6.117 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003243/0.5815, allocations: 0.9974 MB / 0.993 GB, free: 5.137 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004847/0.5863, allocations: 1.948 MB / 0.9949 GB, free: 3.184 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004289/0.5906, allocations: 1.699 MB / 0.9965 GB, free: 1.492 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01809/0.6087, allocations: 19.79 MB / 1.016 GB, free: 13.65 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008211/0.617, allocations: 7.185 MB / 1.023 GB, free: 6.395 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01083/0.6278, allocations: 6.638 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 15.75 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008237/0.636, allocations: 5.73 MB / 1.035 GB, free: 10 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002002/0.6381, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.006779/0.6449, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 6.023 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002912/0.6478, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 3.074 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.005401/0.6532, allocations: 4.741 MB / 1.046 GB, free: 14.31 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01334/0.6665, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.999e-06/0.6666, allocations: 0 / 1.061 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.373e-06/0.6666, allocations: 0 / 1.061 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002218/0.6668, allocations: 0 / 1.061 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02225/0.6891, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.352 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.065e-05/0.6891, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.073 GB, free: 3.344 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0007179/0.6898, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 2.844 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00201/0.6919, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 1.953 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01639/0.7083, allocations: 9.433 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.445 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002521/0.7085, allocations: 338.7 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.113 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001178/0.7097, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.645 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009572/0.7193, allocations: 5.968 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.441 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.087e-05/0.7194, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.434 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.00035/0.7197, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.289 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.309e-05/0.7198, allocations: 99.92 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 1.191 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006601/0.7264, allocations: 4.754 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.42 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04747/0.7739, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 8.992 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01116/0.7851, allocations: 6.218 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 2.668 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003463/0.7886, allocations: 2.518 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 148 kB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02281/0.8114, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 2.402 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003026/0.8145, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 252 kB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.28e-06/0.8145, allocations: 0 / 1.151 GB, free: 252 kB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02564/0.8402, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 2.047 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.819e-05/0.8403, allocations: 136.7 kB / 1.165 GB, free: 1.891 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01764/0.8579, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.543 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0006645/0.8586, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.418 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003776/0.8624, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 4.094 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001809/0.8642, allocations: 0.8784 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 3.203 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002507/0.8668, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 1.992 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.948e-05/0.8669, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 1.691 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004899/0.8718, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.184 GB, free: 14.21 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006433/0.8782, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.19 GB, free: 7.078 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05264/0.9309, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 1 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.266e-05/0.931, allocations: 24 kB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.9766 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01599/0.947, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.235 GB, free: 6.809 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.97e-05/0.9471, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.738 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001175/0.9472, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.652 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001625/0.9488, allocations: 0.7124 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 5.918 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004895/0.9538, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 4.438 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0122/0.966, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 4.941 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00866/0.9747, allocations: 1.298 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.641 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0007348/0.9754, allocations: 284 kB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.363 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.4202/1.396, allocations: 7.076 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 272.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005727/1.401, allocations: 5.929 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 269.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04624/1.448, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 251.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001357/1.448, allocations: 30.75 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 251.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01216/1.46, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.699e-05/1.46, allocations: 71.73 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 6.628e-05/1.46, allocations: 84 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001194/1.461, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 243 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004069/1.465, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 241.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007792/1.473, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 226.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007919/1.481, allocations: 1.301 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 224.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0004454/1.482, allocations: 282.3 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001069/1.483, allocations: 0.7615 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 223.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001046/1.484, allocations: 0.6617 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 223.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006703/1.49, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.973e-05/1.49, allocations: 28 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.141e-05/1.49, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 218.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004435/1.495, allocations: 3.963 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 214.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01834/1.513, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 200.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.467e-06/1.513, allocations: 4 kB / 1.353 GB, free: 200.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002313/1.516, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 200.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001034/1.517, allocations: 0.5831 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 199.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002129/1.517, allocations: 137.4 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 199.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007683/1.525, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 184.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.505e-06/1.525, allocations: 4.75 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 184.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.008187/1.533, allocations: 7.118 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 177.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003091/1.536, allocations: 1.659 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 175.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0009264/1.537, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 175.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003951/1.541, allocations: 0.6987 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003623/1.541, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001701/1.541, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.008593/1.55, allocations: 7.28 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 167.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.61e-07/1.55, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 167.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01014/1.56, allocations: 3.955 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 163.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.008909/1.569, allocations: 8.185 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 155.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02229/1.591, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 137.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 6.853e-06/1.591, allocations: 0 / 1.415 GB, free: 137.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003283/1.595, allocations: 3.05 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 134 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01094/1.606, allocations: 2.932 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 131.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3264/1.932, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 21.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004479/1.936, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 16.19 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01169/1.948, allocations: 6.467 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 9.734 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003967/1.952, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.534 GB, free: 6.754 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.01e-07/1.952, allocations: 0 / 1.534 GB, free: 6.754 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.7894/2.742, allocations: 206.7 MB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.6 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0001524/2.742, allocations: 299.3 kB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.2 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 6.424/9.165, allocations: 2.25 kB / 1.736 GB, free: 386.2 MB / 1.17 GB
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)