Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001284/0.001284, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001318/0.001318, allocations: 194.7 kB / 16.26 MB, free: 6.621 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.26/1.26, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.527 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.319/2.319, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7101 GB, free: 5.258 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001197/0.001197, allocations: 63.91 kB / 0.8688 GB, free: 4.984 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5419/0.5431, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.711 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02886/0.572, allocations: 31.51 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 3.086 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01525/0.5873, allocations: 12.22 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.824 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002196/0.5895, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.773 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002721/0.5923, allocations: 1.015 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.754 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004181/0.5965, allocations: 1.947 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 3.801 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.003653/0.6001, allocations: 1.692 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 2.117 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01645/0.6166, allocations: 19.79 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 14.29 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.007556/0.6242, allocations: 7.181 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 7.027 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.009391/0.6336, allocations: 6.636 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 400 kB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.007116/0.6407, allocations: 5.734 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001227/0.642, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 9.891 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.005307/0.6473, allocations: 3.235 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.652 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002539/0.6498, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.109 GB, free: 3.707 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.005352/0.6552, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.114 GB, free: 14.93 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01332/0.6685, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.57 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.759e-06/0.6686, allocations: 4 kB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.57 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.153e-06/0.6686, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.57 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002438/0.6688, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.57 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02189/0.6907, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 3.977 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.171e-05/0.6908, allocations: 16.03 kB / 1.14 GB, free: 3.961 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0007176/0.6915, allocations: 496.3 kB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.465 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002005/0.6935, allocations: 0.8846 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 2.57 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01544/0.709, allocations: 9.422 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 9.074 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002246/0.7092, allocations: 334.7 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 8.746 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0008548/0.7101, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 8.27 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.007969/0.718, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.082 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.116e-05/0.7181, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.066 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003158/0.7185, allocations: 148 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.922 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.563e-05/0.7185, allocations: 95.92 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.828 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006144/0.7247, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 13.05 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04473/0.7694, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.195 GB, free: 9.617 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01083/0.7803, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 3.277 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003313/0.7836, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 0.7695 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02073/0.8044, allocations: 13.19 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 3.035 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002894/0.8073, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 0.875 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.827e-06/0.8073, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.219 GB, free: 0.8711 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02302/0.8304, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 2.672 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.851e-05/0.8305, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.52 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01516/0.8456, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 8.164 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007661/0.8464, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.243 GB, free: 8.043 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003301/0.8497, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.719 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001505/0.8512, allocations: 0.8706 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.836 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00171/0.853, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.617 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 8.847e-05/0.8531, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.316 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.3971/1.25, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 207.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009303/1.26, allocations: 5.931 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 204.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05806/1.318, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 189.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001406/1.318, allocations: 22.25 kB / 1.293 GB, free: 189.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01397/1.332, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001056/1.332, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.00011/1.332, allocations: 88.16 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 180.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001343/1.333, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 179.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004383/1.338, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 178.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.00809/1.346, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 162.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008419/1.354, allocations: 1.298 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 161.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009399/1.355, allocations: 280 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 161.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008388/1.364, allocations: 7.072 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 154 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005013/1.369, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 146.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04381/1.413, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 108.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.476e-05/1.413, allocations: 28 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 108.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01339/1.426, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.06 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.796e-05/1.426, allocations: 70.64 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.98 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.854e-05/1.426, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.89 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001297/1.428, allocations: 0.7089 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 98.16 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004309/1.432, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 96.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008097/1.44, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 81.26 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008229/1.448, allocations: 1.304 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 79.99 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00081/1.449, allocations: 283.9 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 79.71 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001738/1.451, allocations: 0.7508 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001866/1.453, allocations: 0.6622 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 78.67 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.00726/1.46, allocations: 5.15 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.48 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.806e-05/1.46, allocations: 23.94 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.46 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.609e-05/1.46, allocations: 4 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 73.46 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004413/1.464, allocations: 3.97 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 69.46 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01886/1.483, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.858e-06/1.483, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002245/1.486, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 55.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001082/1.487, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 54.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002283/1.487, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.422 GB, free: 54.57 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007633/1.494, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.658e-06/1.495, allocations: 8 kB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.008575/1.503, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 31.99 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003644/1.507, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 30.31 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001865/1.509, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 30.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004881/1.514, allocations: 0.6996 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.49 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003845/1.514, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.33 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001792/1.514, allocations: 91.95 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.009088/1.523, allocations: 7.28 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 21.97 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3e-07/1.523, allocations: 0 / 1.453 GB, free: 21.97 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01028/1.533, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 18.06 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.008934/1.542, allocations: 8.183 MB / 1.465 GB, free: 9.852 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02388/1.566, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.482 GB, free: 7.727 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 6.923e-06/1.566, allocations: 0 / 1.482 GB, free: 7.727 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004202/1.571, allocations: 3.042 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 4.598 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01207/1.583, allocations: 2.924 MB / 1.488 GB, free: 1.727 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3474/1.93, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.588 GB, free: 4.184 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006685/1.937, allocations: 5.376 MB / 1.593 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01394/1.951, allocations: 6.467 MB / 1.599 GB, free: 8.312 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004964/1.956, allocations: 2.971 MB / 1.602 GB, free: 5.34 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.61e-07/1.956, allocations: 4 kB / 1.602 GB, free: 5.336 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 5.287/7.242, allocations: 206.7 MB / 1.804 GB, free: 375.5 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0001806/7.243, allocations: 293.4 kB / 1.804 GB, free: 375.2 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 11.35/18.6, allocations: 7.125 kB / 1.804 GB, free: 375.2 MB / 1.248 GB
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)