Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001941/0.001941, allocations: 105 kB / 15.98 MB, free: 6.348 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002071/0.002071, allocations: 198.6 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 6.188 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.476/1.476, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 13.71 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.854/2.854, allocations: 482.2 MB / 0.7548 GB, free: 7.387 MB / 0.6231 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002016/0.002016, allocations: 59.12 kB / 0.9238 GB, free: 0.5156 MB / 0.6856 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.9141/0.9162, allocations: 162.2 MB / 1.082 GB, free: 1.711 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03782/0.9541, allocations: 31.54 MB / 1.113 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02122/0.9753, allocations: 12.23 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 2.473 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003396/0.9788, allocations: 53.22 kB / 1.125 GB, free: 2.453 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003867/0.9827, allocations: 1.006 MB / 1.126 GB, free: 1.953 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007547/0.9903, allocations: 1.941 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 0.8359 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006458/0.9967, allocations: 1.694 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.98 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02534/1.022, allocations: 19.81 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 5.926 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01248/1.035, allocations: 7.194 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 1.629 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01662/1.051, allocations: 6.716 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 12.98 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01249/1.064, allocations: 5.711 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 7.246 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003008/1.067, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 6.5 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01032/1.077, allocations: 3.235 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 3.262 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005545/1.083, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 320 kB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01187/1.095, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 11.53 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01817/1.113, allocations: 12.85 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 14.65 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.814e-06/1.113, allocations: 0 / 1.192 GB, free: 14.65 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.584e-06/1.113, allocations: 0 / 1.192 GB, free: 14.65 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000472/1.113, allocations: 0 / 1.192 GB, free: 14.65 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03292/1.146, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.203 GB, free: 3.055 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.475e-05/1.146, allocations: 12.02 kB / 1.203 GB, free: 3.043 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003951/1.15, allocations: 0.881 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 2.152 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02227/1.173, allocations: 9.429 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 8.648 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003664/1.173, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.214 GB, free: 8.324 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001789/1.175, allocations: 487.7 kB / 1.214 GB, free: 7.848 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01223/1.187, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 1.648 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.024e-05/1.187, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.22 GB, free: 1.633 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004426/1.188, allocations: 148 kB / 1.22 GB, free: 1.488 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001141/1.188, allocations: 88 kB / 1.22 GB, free: 1.402 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008797/1.197, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.225 GB, free: 12.62 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06159/1.258, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 9.184 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01274/1.271, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 2.852 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004214/1.275, allocations: 2.51 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 348 kB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02692/1.302, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003526/1.306, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.281 GB, free: 452 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.459e-06/1.306, allocations: 0 / 1.281 GB, free: 452 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0311/1.337, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 2.238 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.965e-05/1.337, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 2.086 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02112/1.358, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 7.73 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001087/1.359, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.305 GB, free: 7.605 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004949/1.364, allocations: 3.293 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 4.289 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002141/1.367, allocations: 0.8785 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 3.398 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002469/1.369, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.311 GB, free: 2.18 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001465/1.369, allocations: 309 kB / 1.311 GB, free: 1.875 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005603/1.375, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 14.4 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007839/1.383, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 7.266 MB / 1.045 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06345/1.446, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 1.184 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.102e-05/1.446, allocations: 24 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 1.16 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02111/1.467, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 7 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001149/1.468, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.366 GB, free: 6.926 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001538/1.468, allocations: 84 kB / 1.366 GB, free: 6.844 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001835/1.47, allocations: 0.7126 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 6.109 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005518/1.475, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 4.629 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01425/1.489, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 5.121 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009927/1.499, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 3.816 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001358/1.501, allocations: 280 kB / 1.384 GB, free: 3.543 MB / 1.107 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01332/1.514, allocations: 7.081 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008374/1.522, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 5.32 MB / 1.123 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06489/1.587, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.432 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.787e-05/1.588, allocations: 24 kB / 1.432 GB, free: 15.27 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02247/1.61, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 5.105 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001792/1.61, allocations: 71.58 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 5.031 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001953/1.61, allocations: 84 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 4.949 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002099/1.613, allocations: 0.7125 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 4.215 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006398/1.619, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 2.734 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01706/1.636, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.227 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01035/1.646, allocations: 1.31 MB / 1.46 GB, free: 1.914 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001496/1.648, allocations: 272 kB / 1.46 GB, free: 1.648 MB / 1.186 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002508/1.651, allocations: 0.7635 MB / 1.461 GB, free: 0.875 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002809/1.653, allocations: 0.6672 MB / 1.461 GB, free: 204 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01171/1.665, allocations: 5.14 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.626e-05/1.665, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.466 GB, free: 10.99 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.247e-05/1.665, allocations: 8 kB / 1.466 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006835/1.672, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 6.992 MB / 1.201 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03349/1.706, allocations: 13.37 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 9.391 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.758e-05/1.706, allocations: 4 kB / 1.483 GB, free: 9.387 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002854/1.709, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 8.781 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001689/1.71, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 8.184 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005393/1.711, allocations: 139.8 kB / 1.485 GB, free: 8.047 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01438/1.725, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 8.664 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.312e-06/1.725, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.499 GB, free: 8.656 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01457/1.74, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.506 GB, free: 1.449 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005579/1.745, allocations: 1.652 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 15.77 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002851/1.748, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.507 GB, free: 15.64 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006401/1.755, allocations: 0.6898 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007257/1.755, allocations: 169.6 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004392/1.756, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01781/1.774, allocations: 7.28 MB / 1.515 GB, free: 7.434 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 6.61e-07/1.774, allocations: 0 / 1.515 GB, free: 7.434 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01985/1.794, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 3.473 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002661/1.796, allocations: 0.586 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 2.887 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03404/1.83, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.537 GB, free: 0.7344 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.275e-05/1.83, allocations: 0 / 1.537 GB, free: 0.7344 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.6117/2.442, allocations: 3.028 MB / 1.54 GB, free: 398.5 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01862/2.461, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.543 GB, free: 398.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04272/2.504, allocations: 21.38 MB / 1.564 GB, free: 390 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01096/2.515, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.569 GB, free: 388.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003298/2.518, allocations: 448.9 kB / 1.57 GB, free: 388.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.503e-06/2.518, allocations: 0 / 1.57 GB, free: 388.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.048/3.566, allocations: 477.2 MB / 2.036 GB, free: 451.8 MB / 1.326 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches