Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001591/0.001591, allocations: 104.9 kB / 15.99 MB, free: 5.895 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001678/0.001678, allocations: 191.8 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 5.746 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.409/1.409, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 15.44 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.799/2.799, allocations: 482.4 MB / 0.755 GB, free: 7.137 MB / 0.6231 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001943/0.001943, allocations: 68.14 kB / 0.924 GB, free: 344 kB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.8683/0.8702, allocations: 162.2 MB / 1.082 GB, free: 1.625 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03816/0.9084, allocations: 31.55 MB / 1.113 GB, free: 11.05 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02118/0.9297, allocations: 12.21 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 2.395 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003356/0.9331, allocations: 53.53 kB / 1.125 GB, free: 2.375 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004185/0.9373, allocations: 1.013 MB / 1.126 GB, free: 1.867 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.008039/0.9454, allocations: 1.925 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 0.7656 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006632/0.952, allocations: 1.707 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 15.9 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02502/0.9771, allocations: 19.81 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 5.789 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01146/0.9886, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 1.508 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01594/1.005, allocations: 6.716 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 12.78 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01195/1.017, allocations: 5.715 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 7.047 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003033/1.02, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 6.301 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009564/1.029, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 3.062 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005412/1.035, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 124 kB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.0113/1.046, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01677/1.063, allocations: 12.86 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.067e-06/1.063, allocations: 0 / 1.192 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.114e-06/1.063, allocations: 0 / 1.192 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004685/1.063, allocations: 0 / 1.192 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03261/1.096, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.203 GB, free: 2.863 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.856e-05/1.096, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.203 GB, free: 2.855 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004878/1.101, allocations: 0.881 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 1.965 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02344/1.124, allocations: 9.432 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 8.457 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003824/1.125, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.214 GB, free: 8.125 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001923/1.127, allocations: 487.7 kB / 1.214 GB, free: 7.648 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01368/1.14, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 1.449 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.267e-05/1.141, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.22 GB, free: 1.438 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004913/1.141, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.22 GB, free: 1.289 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001204/1.141, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.22 GB, free: 1.195 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009444/1.151, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.225 GB, free: 12.42 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06433/1.215, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 8.988 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01312/1.228, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 2.656 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004558/1.233, allocations: 2.505 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 152 kB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02778/1.261, allocations: 13.21 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 2.402 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003564/1.264, allocations: 2.13 MB / 1.281 GB, free: 256 kB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.759e-06/1.264, allocations: 0 / 1.281 GB, free: 256 kB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03289/1.297, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 2.047 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.000104/1.297, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 1.898 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02242/1.32, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 7.543 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001072/1.321, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.306 GB, free: 7.418 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00558/1.326, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 4.094 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002234/1.329, allocations: 0.8668 MB / 1.31 GB, free: 3.215 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002806/1.332, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.311 GB, free: 1.996 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001456/1.332, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.311 GB, free: 1.691 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005845/1.338, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 14.23 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008794/1.346, allocations: 5.94 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 7.082 MB / 1.045 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06801/1.414, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 0.9844 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.227e-05/1.415, allocations: 24 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 0.9609 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0219/1.437, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 6.793 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001449/1.437, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.366 GB, free: 6.723 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001371/1.437, allocations: 84 kB / 1.366 GB, free: 6.641 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001836/1.439, allocations: 0.7124 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 5.906 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005781/1.444, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 4.426 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01449/1.459, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 4.938 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01063/1.47, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.384 GB, free: 3.633 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001416/1.471, allocations: 280 kB / 1.384 GB, free: 3.359 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01295/1.484, allocations: 7.093 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 12.25 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00928/1.493, allocations: 5.94 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 5.109 MB / 1.123 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07066/1.564, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.432 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.622e-05/1.564, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.432 GB, free: 15.07 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02376/1.588, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 4.906 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001821/1.588, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001792/1.588, allocations: 84 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 4.746 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002039/1.591, allocations: 0.7092 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 4.016 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006123/1.597, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 2.535 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01474/1.611, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.459 GB, free: 3.023 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01051/1.622, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.46 GB, free: 1.715 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001589/1.624, allocations: 272 kB / 1.46 GB, free: 1.449 MB / 1.186 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002934/1.627, allocations: 0.7571 MB / 1.461 GB, free: 0.6836 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003125/1.63, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 12 kB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01222/1.642, allocations: 5.149 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 10.83 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.329e-05/1.642, allocations: 20 kB / 1.467 GB, free: 10.81 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.765e-05/1.642, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.467 GB, free: 10.8 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006945/1.649, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 6.797 MB / 1.201 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03348/1.683, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 9.191 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.913e-05/1.683, allocations: 4 kB / 1.484 GB, free: 9.188 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002906/1.686, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 8.582 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001751/1.687, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 7.984 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005892/1.688, allocations: 143.8 kB / 1.485 GB, free: 7.844 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01424/1.702, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 8.477 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 8.215e-06/1.702, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.499 GB, free: 8.469 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01453/1.717, allocations: 7.117 MB / 1.506 GB, free: 1.262 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005426/1.722, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 15.57 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002646/1.725, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 15.45 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006468/1.731, allocations: 0.6937 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 14.75 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006651/1.732, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 14.59 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004019/1.732, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.509 GB, free: 14.51 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01778/1.75, allocations: 7.28 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 7.238 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.21e-07/1.75, allocations: 4 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 7.234 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01904/1.769, allocations: 3.953 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 3.281 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002486/1.772, allocations: 0.5969 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 2.691 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03316/1.805, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.538 GB, free: 0.5391 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.314e-05/1.805, allocations: 0 / 1.538 GB, free: 0.5391 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.5436/2.349, allocations: 3.03 MB / 1.541 GB, free: 398.6 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01643/2.365, allocations: 2.934 MB / 1.543 GB, free: 398.3 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03742/2.403, allocations: 21.37 MB / 1.564 GB, free: 390 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01101/2.414, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.57 GB, free: 388.2 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003524/2.417, allocations: 455 kB / 1.57 GB, free: 388.2 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.804e-06/2.417, allocations: 0 / 1.57 GB, free: 388.2 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.109/3.526, allocations: 477.2 MB / 2.036 GB, free: 451.7 MB / 1.326 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches