Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001674/0.001674, allocations: 101.6 kB / 15.99 MB, free: 6.367 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001965/0.001965, allocations: 195.6 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 6.195 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.372/1.372, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 15.43 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.208/2.208, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.665 GB, free: 0.8984 MB / 0.5294 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001427/0.001427, allocations: 64.83 kB / 0.8127 GB, free: 33.18 MB / 0.6231 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3399/0.3414, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9498 GB, free: 9.25 MB / 0.7325 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.04387/0.3853, allocations: 31.53 MB / 0.9806 GB, free: 9.609 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02102/0.4064, allocations: 12.21 MB / 0.9925 GB, free: 13.36 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002817/0.4093, allocations: 55.69 kB / 0.9925 GB, free: 13.3 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003903/0.4132, allocations: 1.007 MB / 0.9935 GB, free: 12.29 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00629/0.4195, allocations: 1.941 MB / 0.9954 GB, free: 10.35 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005674/0.4252, allocations: 1.694 MB / 0.9971 GB, free: 8.66 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02439/0.4496, allocations: 19.79 MB / 1.016 GB, free: 4.824 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01154/0.4612, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.023 GB, free: 13.55 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0157/0.477, allocations: 6.629 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 6.918 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01101/0.488, allocations: 5.73 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 1.168 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003192/0.4912, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 432 kB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00968/0.5009, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 13.18 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005506/0.5064, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 10.24 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01157/0.518, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 5.477 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01788/0.536, allocations: 12.85 MB / 1.059 GB, free: 8.602 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.069e-05/0.536, allocations: 8 kB / 1.059 GB, free: 8.594 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.855e-06/0.536, allocations: 0 / 1.059 GB, free: 8.594 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005686/0.5366, allocations: 0 / 1.059 GB, free: 8.594 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0358/0.5724, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.071 GB, free: 13 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.323e-05/0.5725, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.071 GB, free: 12.98 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004938/0.5774, allocations: 0.8804 MB / 1.072 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02406/0.6015, allocations: 9.418 MB / 1.081 GB, free: 2.598 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004266/0.602, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.081 GB, free: 2.273 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002113/0.6041, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.082 GB, free: 1.801 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.6077/1.212, allocations: 5.963 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 115.6 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.217e-05/1.212, allocations: 11.11 kB / 1.087 GB, free: 115.6 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004568/1.212, allocations: 146.4 kB / 1.087 GB, free: 115.5 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001335/1.213, allocations: 96.69 kB / 1.088 GB, free: 115.5 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009987/1.223, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.092 GB, free: 114.1 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06543/1.288, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 94.01 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01374/1.302, allocations: 6.221 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 90.66 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005055/1.307, allocations: 2.513 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 89.45 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03017/1.337, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 80.26 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004205/1.341, allocations: 2.139 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 79.06 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 1.282e-05/1.341, allocations: 0 / 1.149 GB, free: 79.06 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03348/1.375, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 69.54 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.316e-05/1.375, allocations: 124.8 kB / 1.163 GB, free: 69.39 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02252/1.398, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 59.04 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00121/1.399, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.173 GB, free: 58.92 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004461/1.403, allocations: 3.311 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 55.61 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002269/1.406, allocations: 0.8663 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 54.75 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003867/1.409, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 53.54 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.785e-05/1.409, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.178 GB, free: 53.24 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004928/1.414, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.182 GB, free: 49.77 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00603/1.42, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 42.63 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04985/1.47, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.555 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.553e-05/1.47, allocations: 24 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.531 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01871/1.489, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 10.37 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000139/1.489, allocations: 75.72 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 10.29 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001681/1.49, allocations: 84 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 10.21 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001886/1.491, allocations: 0.7048 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 9.48 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005402/1.497, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.235 GB, free: 8 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01379/1.511, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 8.527 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01225/1.523, allocations: 1.314 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 7.211 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00146/1.524, allocations: 276 kB / 1.251 GB, free: 6.941 MB / 0.8887 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01308/1.538, allocations: 7.08 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 15.85 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008279/1.546, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 8.711 MB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06149/1.607, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 2.688 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001021/1.608, allocations: 26.95 kB / 1.3 GB, free: 2.664 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02107/1.629, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 8.504 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001525/1.629, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.309 GB, free: 8.43 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002002/1.629, allocations: 87.28 kB / 1.31 GB, free: 8.348 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001976/1.631, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.31 GB, free: 7.609 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005649/1.637, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 6.133 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01321/1.65, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.326 GB, free: 6.645 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01153/1.661, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 5.34 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001616/1.663, allocations: 272 kB / 1.327 GB, free: 5.074 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003018/1.666, allocations: 0.7773 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 4.289 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003475/1.67, allocations: 0.6671 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.613 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01223/1.682, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 14.45 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.63e-05/1.682, allocations: 28 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 14.42 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 3.009e-05/1.682, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 14.41 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00668/1.689, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 10.42 MB / 0.9825 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03753/1.726, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 12.85 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 2.117e-05/1.726, allocations: 11.92 kB / 1.351 GB, free: 12.84 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00282/1.729, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 12.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.0017/1.731, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 11.64 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000548/1.731, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.352 GB, free: 11.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01292/1.744, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.523e-06/1.744, allocations: 4 kB / 1.366 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01427/1.759, allocations: 7.116 MB / 1.373 GB, free: 4.941 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006304/1.765, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 3.258 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003131/1.768, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 3.129 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007198/1.775, allocations: 0.6902 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 2.438 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007066/1.776, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.376 GB, free: 2.27 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.00045/1.777, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.376 GB, free: 2.188 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01965/1.796, allocations: 7.276 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.81e-07/1.796, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02292/1.819, allocations: 3.955 MB / 1.387 GB, free: 6.988 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003002/1.822, allocations: 0.5836 MB / 1.387 GB, free: 6.457 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03214/1.854, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 4.332 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.486e-05/1.855, allocations: 4 kB / 1.405 GB, free: 4.328 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005259/1.86, allocations: 3.026 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 1.215 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02107/1.881, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.411 GB, free: 14.33 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04986/1.931, allocations: 21.36 MB / 1.432 GB, free: 8.91 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01221/1.943, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.504 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003668/1.947, allocations: 451.3 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.062 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.92e-07/1.947, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.059 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.044/2.99, allocations: 477.2 MB / 1.903 GB, free: 23.47 MB / 1.154 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches