Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001301/0.001301, allocations: 106.8 kB / 15.99 MB, free: 6.348 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001299/0.001299, allocations: 191.3 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 6.188 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.383/1.383, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 13.73 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.258/2.258, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.665 GB, free: 0.9297 MB / 0.5294 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001306/0.001306, allocations: 65.88 kB / 0.8127 GB, free: 32.52 MB / 0.6231 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3024/0.3037, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9498 GB, free: 9.266 MB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03843/0.3422, allocations: 31.52 MB / 0.9806 GB, free: 9.633 MB / 0.7637 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01874/0.361, allocations: 12.22 MB / 0.9925 GB, free: 13.38 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002595/0.3636, allocations: 55.62 kB / 0.9925 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003682/0.3673, allocations: 1.003 MB / 0.9935 GB, free: 12.31 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006482/0.3739, allocations: 1.937 MB / 0.9954 GB, free: 10.37 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005664/0.3796, allocations: 1.702 MB / 0.9971 GB, free: 8.676 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02461/0.4042, allocations: 19.78 MB / 1.016 GB, free: 4.844 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01286/0.4171, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.023 GB, free: 13.58 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0146/0.4317, allocations: 6.631 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 6.945 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01105/0.4428, allocations: 5.73 MB / 1.035 GB, free: 1.195 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002929/0.4458, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 460 kB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008999/0.4548, allocations: 3.235 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 13.21 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005281/0.4601, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 10.26 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01082/0.471, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 5.496 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01645/0.4875, allocations: 12.85 MB / 1.059 GB, free: 8.617 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.376e-06/0.4875, allocations: 0 / 1.059 GB, free: 8.617 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.984e-06/0.4875, allocations: 0 / 1.059 GB, free: 8.617 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005135/0.4881, allocations: 0 / 1.059 GB, free: 8.617 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03455/0.5226, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.071 GB, free: 13.03 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.948e-05/0.5227, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.071 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004801/0.5275, allocations: 0.8843 MB / 1.072 GB, free: 12.12 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02259/0.5501, allocations: 9.428 MB / 1.081 GB, free: 2.621 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004017/0.5506, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.081 GB, free: 2.297 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002796/0.5534, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.081 GB, free: 1.828 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.6211/1.174, allocations: 5.961 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 117.2 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.068e-05/1.175, allocations: 13.8 kB / 1.087 GB, free: 117.2 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004202/1.175, allocations: 148.4 kB / 1.087 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001435/1.175, allocations: 92.25 kB / 1.088 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.0097/1.185, allocations: 4.759 MB / 1.092 GB, free: 115.6 MB / 0.8575 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06884/1.254, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 95.8 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01226/1.266, allocations: 6.229 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 92.45 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004092/1.27, allocations: 2.512 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 91.24 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02638/1.297, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 82.06 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002888/1.3, allocations: 2.132 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 80.87 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.23e-06/1.3, allocations: 0 / 1.149 GB, free: 80.87 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03112/1.331, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 71.87 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.82e-05/1.331, allocations: 124.8 kB / 1.163 GB, free: 71.72 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02089/1.352, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 61.37 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001423/1.353, allocations: 117.6 kB / 1.173 GB, free: 61.25 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004157/1.357, allocations: 3.308 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 57.95 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00258/1.36, allocations: 0.866 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 57.09 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002681/1.363, allocations: 1.208 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 55.87 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 7.423e-05/1.363, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.178 GB, free: 55.57 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004568/1.367, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.182 GB, free: 52.11 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00589/1.373, allocations: 5.937 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 44.96 MB / 0.8575 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05456/1.428, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 6.891 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.757e-05/1.428, allocations: 24 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 6.867 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01923/1.447, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00016/1.447, allocations: 79.78 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 12.62 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001755/1.448, allocations: 84 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 12.54 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001952/1.45, allocations: 0.7045 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 11.81 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00588/1.455, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.235 GB, free: 10.34 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01395/1.469, allocations: 14.54 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 10.85 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0108/1.48, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 9.543 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001483/1.482, allocations: 276 kB / 1.251 GB, free: 9.273 MB / 0.8887 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01515/1.497, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 2.176 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009091/1.506, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 0.9044 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06466/1.571, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 5.012 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.763e-05/1.571, allocations: 24 kB / 1.3 GB, free: 4.988 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02183/1.593, allocations: 10.06 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 10.84 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001338/1.593, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.309 GB, free: 10.77 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001596/1.593, allocations: 86.34 kB / 1.31 GB, free: 10.68 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001841/1.595, allocations: 0.709 MB / 1.31 GB, free: 9.953 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005687/1.601, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 8.469 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0127/1.613, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.326 GB, free: 8.973 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01028/1.624, allocations: 1.294 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 7.676 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001302/1.625, allocations: 280.8 kB / 1.327 GB, free: 7.402 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002242/1.627, allocations: 0.7629 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 6.629 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003238/1.631, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 5.961 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01107/1.642, allocations: 5.14 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 0.7852 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.827e-05/1.642, allocations: 28 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 0.7578 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.999e-05/1.642, allocations: 4 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 0.7539 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005945/1.648, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 12.76 MB / 0.9825 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03433/1.682, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 15.19 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.92e-05/1.682, allocations: 8 kB / 1.351 GB, free: 15.18 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002741/1.685, allocations: 0.5929 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 14.59 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001639/1.687, allocations: 0.5873 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005117/1.687, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.352 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01236/1.699, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 14.49 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.48e-06/1.699, allocations: 8.062 kB / 1.366 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01354/1.713, allocations: 7.106 MB / 1.373 GB, free: 7.289 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005784/1.719, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 5.605 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00285/1.722, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 5.477 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006524/1.728, allocations: 0.7057 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 4.77 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.000691/1.729, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.376 GB, free: 4.605 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004097/1.729, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.376 GB, free: 4.523 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01686/1.746, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 13.25 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.31e-07/1.746, allocations: 0 / 1.383 GB, free: 13.25 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01905/1.765, allocations: 3.955 MB / 1.387 GB, free: 9.324 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00253/1.768, allocations: 0.5799 MB / 1.387 GB, free: 8.793 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03073/1.799, allocations: 17.96 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 6.652 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.373e-05/1.799, allocations: 4 kB / 1.405 GB, free: 6.648 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005133/1.804, allocations: 3.04 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 3.516 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01968/1.824, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.411 GB, free: 0.6406 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04165/1.865, allocations: 21.37 MB / 1.432 GB, free: 11.22 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008701/1.874, allocations: 5.377 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 5.805 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002996/1.877, allocations: 447.4 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 5.367 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.613e-06/1.877, allocations: 0 / 1.437 GB, free: 5.367 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.9877/2.865, allocations: 477.2 MB / 1.903 GB, free: 27.71 MB / 1.154 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches