Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001571/0.001571, allocations: 105.5 kB / 15.98 MB, free: 6.352 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001531/0.001531, allocations: 195.6 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 6.184 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.446/1.446, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 15.43 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.683/2.683, allocations: 469.8 MB / 0.7427 GB, free: 3.641 MB / 0.6075 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001955/0.001955, allocations: 71.23 kB / 0.9087 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.4023/0.4042, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 15.16 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.6789/1.083, allocations: 31.5 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 6 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01938/1.103, allocations: 12.23 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 13.45 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003378/1.106, allocations: 57.69 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 13.43 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003937/1.11, allocations: 0.9979 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 12.93 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007891/1.118, allocations: 1.943 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006423/1.124, allocations: 1.709 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 10.95 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02651/1.151, allocations: 19.78 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 2.711 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01296/1.164, allocations: 7.192 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 16 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01747/1.181, allocations: 6.645 MB / 1.144 GB, free: 13.48 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01388/1.195, allocations: 5.729 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003965/1.199, allocations: 0.7457 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0119/1.211, allocations: 3.232 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 9.328 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006731/1.218, allocations: 2.932 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 7.328 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01451/1.233, allocations: 4.75 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 4.109 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0202/1.253, allocations: 12.85 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.262 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.35e-05/1.253, allocations: 3.984 kB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 3.146e-06/1.253, allocations: 0 / 1.174 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0007362/1.254, allocations: 4 kB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.254 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03931/1.293, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 13.66 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.362e-05/1.293, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.185 GB, free: 13.65 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005049/1.298, allocations: 0.8812 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 12.76 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0225/1.321, allocations: 9.425 MB / 1.195 GB, free: 3.258 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000354/1.321, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.195 GB, free: 2.93 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001745/1.323, allocations: 475.8 kB / 1.196 GB, free: 2.465 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01284/1.336, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 12.26 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.349e-05/1.336, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 12.25 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004574/1.336, allocations: 148 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 12.11 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001106/1.336, allocations: 100 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 12.01 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009585/1.346, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.207 GB, free: 7.238 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07011/1.416, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 3.805 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01318/1.429, allocations: 6.232 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 13.48 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004698/1.434, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02824/1.462, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 13.23 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003535/1.466, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.318e-06/1.466, allocations: 0 / 1.263 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03805/1.504, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.277 GB, free: 12.85 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001054/1.504, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.277 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02689/1.531, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 2.348 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001243/1.532, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.287 GB, free: 2.227 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005998/1.538, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 14.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.0024/1.541, allocations: 0.8745 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 14.02 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002759/1.544, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.292 GB, free: 12.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.000146/1.544, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.293 GB, free: 12.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005727/1.55, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.296 GB, free: 9.027 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008834/1.558, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 1.891 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07258/1.631, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 11.79 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.747e-05/1.631, allocations: 28 kB / 1.338 GB, free: 11.76 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02559/1.657, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 1.594 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001836/1.657, allocations: 66.67 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 1.523 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001788/1.657, allocations: 84 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 1.441 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002124/1.659, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 0.707 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006343/1.666, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 15.22 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01496/1.681, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01137/1.692, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 14.41 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001684/1.694, allocations: 276 kB / 1.366 GB, free: 14.14 MB / 1.092 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01609/1.71, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.372 GB, free: 7.039 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01025/1.72, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 15.91 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0723/1.793, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.414 GB, free: 9.891 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.356e-05/1.793, allocations: 28 kB / 1.414 GB, free: 9.863 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02447/1.817, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.424 GB, free: 15.69 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001656/1.817, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.424 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000174/1.818, allocations: 84 kB / 1.424 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002061/1.82, allocations: 0.7087 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006264/1.826, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01518/1.841, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01149/1.853, allocations: 1.31 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 12.52 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001668/1.854, allocations: 272 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 12.26 MB / 1.17 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002925/1.857, allocations: 0.7571 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 11.49 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00344/1.861, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 10.82 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01277/1.874, allocations: 5.161 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 5.625 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.673e-05/1.874, allocations: 23.94 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 5.602 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.583e-05/1.874, allocations: 8 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 5.594 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007162/1.881, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 1.602 MB / 1.17 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03568/1.917, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.465 GB, free: 3.996 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.731e-05/1.917, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.465 GB, free: 3.988 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002942/1.92, allocations: 0.6046 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 3.383 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001782/1.921, allocations: 0.5872 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 2.773 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006057/1.922, allocations: 135.8 kB / 1.466 GB, free: 2.641 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01549/1.938, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 3.27 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.921e-06/1.938, allocations: 4 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 3.266 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01663/1.954, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.487 GB, free: 12.05 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006778/1.961, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 10.37 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003657/1.965, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.489 GB, free: 10.25 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007724/1.973, allocations: 0.6937 MB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.551 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.001005/1.974, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.391 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0006636/1.974, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.305 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02027/1.995, allocations: 7.292 MB / 1.497 GB, free: 2.023 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 6.71e-07/1.995, allocations: 0 / 1.497 GB, free: 2.023 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02463/2.019, allocations: 3.945 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 14.08 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003266/2.023, allocations: 0.5784 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 13.5 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03745/2.06, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.491e-05/2.06, allocations: 0 / 1.519 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.006679/2.067, allocations: 3.032 MB / 1.522 GB, free: 8.215 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0225/2.089, allocations: 2.945 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 5.328 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.05283/2.142, allocations: 21.38 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 15.88 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01177/2.154, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.551 GB, free: 10.47 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003153/2.157, allocations: 459.3 kB / 1.552 GB, free: 10.02 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.372e-06/2.157, allocations: 0 / 1.552 GB, free: 10.02 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.089/3.246, allocations: 477.2 MB / 2.018 GB, free: 3.742 MB / 1.279 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches