Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001772/0.001772, allocations: 109.1 kB / 15.99 MB, free: 6.355 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001809/0.001809, allocations: 190.4 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 6.195 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.441/1.441, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 15.44 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.73/2.73, allocations: 469.8 MB / 0.7427 GB, free: 3.605 MB / 0.6075 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001931/0.001931, allocations: 64.86 kB / 0.9087 GB, free: 14.23 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3872/0.3891, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 15.11 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.7181/1.107, allocations: 31.51 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 5.977 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02158/1.129, allocations: 12.22 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 13.4 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003736/1.133, allocations: 53.94 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 13.38 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004103/1.137, allocations: 0.9972 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 12.89 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.008313/1.145, allocations: 1.949 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 11.77 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007381/1.153, allocations: 1.707 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.03468/1.187, allocations: 19.78 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 2.66 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01573/1.203, allocations: 7.192 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 15.96 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0198/1.223, allocations: 6.638 MB / 1.144 GB, free: 13.44 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01473/1.238, allocations: 5.734 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00437/1.242, allocations: 0.7498 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01336/1.256, allocations: 3.224 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 9.293 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007512/1.263, allocations: 2.943 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 7.281 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01756/1.281, allocations: 4.744 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 4.07 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02122/1.302, allocations: 12.84 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.207 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.053e-05/1.302, allocations: 4 kB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.203 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 4.418e-06/1.302, allocations: 0 / 1.174 GB, free: 9.203 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005016/1.303, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.199 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03745/1.34, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 13.6 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 6.29e-05/1.34, allocations: 15.98 kB / 1.185 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004651/1.345, allocations: 0.8812 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02386/1.369, allocations: 9.418 MB / 1.195 GB, free: 3.199 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003849/1.369, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.195 GB, free: 2.871 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002012/1.371, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.196 GB, free: 2.398 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01344/1.385, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 12.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001142/1.385, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0005924/1.385, allocations: 144 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 12.04 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001355/1.386, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009562/1.395, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.207 GB, free: 7.172 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06728/1.462, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 3.738 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01355/1.476, allocations: 6.23 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 13.41 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004647/1.481, allocations: 2.51 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02862/1.509, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003707/1.513, allocations: 2.145 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 10.99 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.378e-06/1.513, allocations: 0 / 1.263 GB, free: 10.99 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03466/1.548, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.277 GB, free: 12.79 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001049/1.548, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.277 GB, free: 12.63 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02275/1.571, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 2.281 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001207/1.572, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.287 GB, free: 2.164 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005522/1.578, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 14.84 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002337/1.58, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 13.95 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002568/1.583, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.292 GB, free: 12.74 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.000143/1.583, allocations: 313.1 kB / 1.293 GB, free: 12.43 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005645/1.588, allocations: 3.443 MB / 1.296 GB, free: 8.969 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008384/1.597, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 1.832 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06958/1.666, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 11.73 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.25e-05/1.667, allocations: 28 kB / 1.338 GB, free: 11.7 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02144/1.688, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 1.543 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001188/1.688, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 1.469 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001473/1.688, allocations: 84 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 1.387 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001824/1.69, allocations: 0.7089 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 0.6562 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005845/1.696, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 15.17 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01412/1.71, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 15.66 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01067/1.721, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 14.36 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001495/1.722, allocations: 272 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 14.09 MB / 1.092 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01409/1.736, allocations: 7.086 MB / 1.372 GB, free: 6.992 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00903/1.746, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 15.86 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06585/1.811, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.414 GB, free: 9.84 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.315e-05/1.812, allocations: 24 kB / 1.414 GB, free: 9.816 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0217/1.833, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.424 GB, free: 15.66 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001064/1.833, allocations: 71.8 kB / 1.424 GB, free: 15.58 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001377/1.834, allocations: 88 kB / 1.424 GB, free: 15.5 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001745/1.835, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 14.76 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005768/1.841, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 13.29 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01391/1.855, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 13.78 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01043/1.866, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 12.48 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00145/1.867, allocations: 272 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 12.21 MB / 1.17 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001995/1.869, allocations: 0.761 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 11.44 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002722/1.872, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 10.77 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.0105/1.882, allocations: 5.151 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 5.586 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.983e-05/1.882, allocations: 31.92 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 5.555 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.316e-05/1.882, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 5.547 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006275/1.889, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 1.555 MB / 1.17 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02862/1.917, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.465 GB, free: 3.938 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.788e-06/1.917, allocations: 0 / 1.465 GB, free: 3.938 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002566/1.92, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 3.332 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001592/1.921, allocations: 0.5755 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 2.734 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003422/1.922, allocations: 139.8 kB / 1.466 GB, free: 2.598 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01336/1.935, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 3.219 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.28e-06/1.935, allocations: 4.156 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 3.215 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01301/1.948, allocations: 7.125 MB / 1.487 GB, free: 12 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005548/1.954, allocations: 1.652 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002578/1.956, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.489 GB, free: 10.2 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006261/1.963, allocations: 0.6977 MB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.496 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005647/1.963, allocations: 169.6 kB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.332 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002732/1.964, allocations: 79.95 kB / 1.49 GB, free: 9.254 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01619/1.98, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.497 GB, free: 1.98 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 8.52e-07/1.98, allocations: 0 / 1.497 GB, free: 1.98 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02103/2.001, allocations: 3.945 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 14.03 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002905/2.004, allocations: 0.5959 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 13.44 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03259/2.036, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 11.29 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.318e-05/2.036, allocations: 0 / 1.519 GB, free: 11.29 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005367/2.042, allocations: 3.036 MB / 1.522 GB, free: 8.156 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01715/2.059, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 5.277 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03891/2.098, allocations: 21.38 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00758/2.106, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.551 GB, free: 10.4 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002994/2.109, allocations: 443.4 kB / 1.552 GB, free: 9.969 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.62e-07/2.109, allocations: 4 kB / 1.552 GB, free: 9.965 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.125/3.234, allocations: 477.2 MB / 2.018 GB, free: 5.82 MB / 1.311 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches