Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001795/0.001795, allocations: 106.9 kB / 15.99 MB, free: 6.348 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002047/0.002047, allocations: 199.8 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 6.188 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.475/1.475, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 13.75 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.604/2.604, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7107 GB, free: 4.656 MB / 0.5762 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002417/0.002417, allocations: 72.11 kB / 0.8694 GB, free: 2.512 MB / 0.6387 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.4188/0.4213, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 10.95 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.04/0.4613, allocations: 31.53 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02103/0.4824, allocations: 12.21 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 15.06 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002969/0.4854, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 15.01 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003755/0.4892, allocations: 1.007 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 14 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006928/0.4963, allocations: 1.946 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 12.04 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005614/0.5019, allocations: 1.696 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.7361/1.238, allocations: 19.77 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 13.94 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01438/1.252, allocations: 7.185 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 13.17 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01796/1.27, allocations: 6.639 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01397/1.284, allocations: 5.732 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 11.84 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004548/1.289, allocations: 0.7463 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 11.84 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01299/1.302, allocations: 3.235 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 11.81 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.01087/1.313, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 11.51 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.02901/1.342, allocations: 4.75 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 8.824 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03175/1.374, allocations: 12.85 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 4.777 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.175e-05/1.374, allocations: 1.844 kB / 1.127 GB, free: 4.777 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.746e-06/1.374, allocations: 0 / 1.127 GB, free: 4.777 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0006907/1.375, allocations: 0 / 1.127 GB, free: 4.777 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.07021/1.445, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 13.72 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 7.157e-05/1.445, allocations: 13.91 kB / 1.138 GB, free: 13.72 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.009374/1.454, allocations: 0.879 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 13.27 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.04341/1.498, allocations: 9.431 MB / 1.148 GB, free: 7.801 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0006162/1.499, allocations: 330.7 kB / 1.149 GB, free: 7.648 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.003948/1.503, allocations: 485.2 kB / 1.149 GB, free: 7.48 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.02904/1.532, allocations: 5.962 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 3.566 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0002901/1.532, allocations: 13.25 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 3.559 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.002506/1.534, allocations: 144 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 3.418 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0002502/1.535, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.02145/1.556, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.16 GB, free: 14.61 MB / 0.8731 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.09895/1.655, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 11.52 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01574/1.671, allocations: 6.235 MB / 1.199 GB, free: 5.242 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005712/1.677, allocations: 2.509 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 2.727 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03737/1.714, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.043 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005685/1.72, allocations: 2.133 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 2.891 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 8.436e-06/1.72, allocations: 0 / 1.216 GB, free: 2.891 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.04898/1.769, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.23 GB, free: 4.719 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001496/1.769, allocations: 130.7 kB / 1.23 GB, free: 4.574 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0333/1.803, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 10.22 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001551/1.804, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.24 GB, free: 10.1 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.008123/1.812, allocations: 3.303 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.801 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.003136/1.815, allocations: 0.8671 MB / 1.245 GB, free: 5.941 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.006162/1.822, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.723 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001611/1.822, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.422 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.00786/1.83, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 0.9531 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01125/1.841, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 9.855 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.08529/1.926, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 4.117 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001465/1.927, allocations: 24 kB / 1.291 GB, free: 4.094 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02835/1.955, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.11 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001583/1.955, allocations: 77.62 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.03 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001959/1.955, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.945 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002281/1.958, allocations: 0.7046 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.219 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006739/1.964, allocations: 1.481 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 7.738 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01635/1.981, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 8.266 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01236/1.993, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 6.957 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001943/1.995, allocations: 284 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 6.68 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0177/2.013, allocations: 7.085 MB / 1.326 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01084/2.024, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 8.457 MB / 1.045 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07852/2.102, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 2.445 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.203e-05/2.102, allocations: 24 kB / 1.367 GB, free: 2.422 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02828/2.131, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 8.27 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001595/2.131, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 8.195 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001754/2.131, allocations: 88.81 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 8.109 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00211/2.133, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 7.375 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006749/2.14, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 5.891 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01576/2.156, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.394 GB, free: 6.398 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01229/2.168, allocations: 1.29 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 5.105 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001892/2.17, allocations: 280 kB / 1.395 GB, free: 4.832 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003146/2.173, allocations: 0.7691 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 4.055 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003645/2.177, allocations: 0.6672 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 3.379 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01404/2.191, allocations: 5.136 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 14.21 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 4.711e-05/2.191, allocations: 28 kB / 1.402 GB, free: 14.18 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 3.573e-05/2.191, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.402 GB, free: 14.17 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007975/2.199, allocations: 3.97 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 10.16 MB / 1.123 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03978/2.239, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.419 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 2.049e-05/2.239, allocations: 4 kB / 1.419 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.003047/2.242, allocations: 0.5971 MB / 1.419 GB, free: 12.01 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001868/2.244, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 11.41 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006474/2.245, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 11.28 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01471/2.259, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 9.628e-06/2.259, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.434 GB, free: 11.9 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0163/2.276, allocations: 7.12 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 4.691 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006836/2.282, allocations: 1.652 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 3.012 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003614/2.286, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 2.883 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007584/2.294, allocations: 0.7018 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 2.18 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0009104/2.295, allocations: 173.6 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 2.012 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005903/2.295, allocations: 79.95 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 1.934 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02045/2.316, allocations: 7.28 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 10.66 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.61e-07/2.316, allocations: 0 / 1.451 GB, free: 10.66 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02562/2.341, allocations: 3.949 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 6.715 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003566/2.345, allocations: 0.5828 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 6.16 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03598/2.381, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 4 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.867e-05/2.381, allocations: 4 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 3.996 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.006055/2.387, allocations: 3.035 MB / 1.476 GB, free: 0.8711 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02458/2.412, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 14 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.05204/2.464, allocations: 21.38 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 8.578 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01287/2.477, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 3.164 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003965/2.481, allocations: 443.4 kB / 1.505 GB, free: 2.73 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.22e-07/2.481, allocations: 0 / 1.505 GB, free: 2.73 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.154/3.635, allocations: 477.2 MB / 1.971 GB, free: 35.39 MB / 1.248 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches