Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001765/0.001765, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6406 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002/0.002, allocations: 199.2 kB / 16.14 MB, free: 6.719 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.471/1.471, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.637 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.73/2.73, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7099 GB, free: 5.371 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001966/0.001966, allocations: 63.89 kB / 0.8686 GB, free: 5.168 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.6672/0.6692, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.762 MB / 0.7637 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03719/0.7064, allocations: 31.58 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 3.066 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02143/0.7279, allocations: 12.44 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.59 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002067/0.73, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.539 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003358/0.7334, allocations: 0.9643 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.57 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005594/0.739, allocations: 1.929 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 3.637 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005219/0.7442, allocations: 1.637 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 2.008 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02621/0.7705, allocations: 22.44 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 11.52 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009521/0.78, allocations: 5.57 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 5.867 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01077/0.7908, allocations: 5.1 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 0.75 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009623/0.8005, allocations: 5.043 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 11.69 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002162/0.8027, allocations: 312 kB / 1.102 GB, free: 11.38 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008057/0.8108, allocations: 2.703 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 8.676 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004476/0.8153, allocations: 2.371 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.297 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009801/0.8251, allocations: 4.03 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 2.246 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02278/0.8479, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 3.234 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.001e-06/0.848, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.234 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.793e-06/0.848, allocations: 4 kB / 1.125 GB, free: 3.23 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005115/0.8485, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.23 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03474/0.8833, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 7.625 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.888e-05/0.8833, allocations: 15.92 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 7.609 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004239/0.8876, allocations: 0.8771 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 6.723 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02417/0.9118, allocations: 9.422 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 13.23 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004346/0.9122, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 12.9 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002119/0.9144, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 12.43 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01598/0.9304, allocations: 5.954 MB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.238 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001599/0.9306, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.223 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001139/0.9317, allocations: 152 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.074 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001353/0.9319, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 5.984 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01117/0.9431, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.211 MB / 0.9044 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06616/1.009, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.191 GB, free: 13.77 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01348/1.023, allocations: 6.226 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.438 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00461/1.027, allocations: 2.502 MB / 1.199 GB, free: 4.934 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02866/1.056, allocations: 13.21 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 7.184 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004382/1.061, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.02 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.711e-06/1.061, allocations: 0 / 1.214 GB, free: 5.02 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03683/1.097, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 6.816 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001075/1.098, allocations: 136.7 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 6.66 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0234/1.121, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 12.32 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009738/1.122, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.238 GB, free: 12.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00581/1.128, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 8.871 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002425/1.13, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 7.988 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004617/1.135, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.773 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001573/1.135, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.473 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.007145/1.142, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.004 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.5242/1.666, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 203.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05714/1.724, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 190.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001417/1.724, allocations: 25.75 kB / 1.289 GB, free: 190.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0141/1.738, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001067/1.738, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001098/1.738, allocations: 84 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001375/1.74, allocations: 0.7164 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 183.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005064/1.745, allocations: 1.477 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 182.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008144/1.753, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 168 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008699/1.762, allocations: 1.301 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 166.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009966/1.763, allocations: 276 kB / 1.316 GB, free: 166.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009284/1.772, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 159.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005594/1.777, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 152.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05157/1.829, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 114.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.403e-05/1.829, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 114.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01588/1.845, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.887e-05/1.845, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001113/1.845, allocations: 84 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001421/1.847, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 103.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004902/1.852, allocations: 1.481 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 102 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008648/1.86, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 87.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009417/1.87, allocations: 1.304 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 86.48 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001189/1.871, allocations: 272 kB / 1.391 GB, free: 86.21 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002335/1.873, allocations: 0.7643 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 85.49 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00271/1.876, allocations: 0.6682 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 85.15 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009227/1.885, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 79.97 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.31e-05/1.885, allocations: 23.98 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 79.95 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.84e-05/1.885, allocations: 12 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 79.93 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005035/1.89, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.401 GB, free: 75.94 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02607/1.916, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.414 GB, free: 62.39 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.195e-05/1.917, allocations: 4 kB / 1.414 GB, free: 62.38 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002476/1.919, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 61.78 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001324/1.92, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 61.18 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004282/1.921, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 61.05 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008253/1.929, allocations: 13.27 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 46.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.389e-06/1.929, allocations: 4 kB / 1.429 GB, free: 46.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01166/1.941, allocations: 7.125 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.63 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004527/1.945, allocations: 1.659 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 37.95 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002387/1.948, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 37.82 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005606/1.953, allocations: 0.7014 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 37.13 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005934/1.954, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 36.97 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003405/1.954, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 36.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01434/1.969, allocations: 7.281 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.62 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.082e-06/1.969, allocations: 0 / 1.445 GB, free: 29.62 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0194/1.988, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 25.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002184/1.99, allocations: 0.5987 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 25.18 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01925/2.01, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.463 GB, free: 11.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.147e-05/2.01, allocations: 256 / 1.463 GB, free: 11.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004557/2.014, allocations: 3.057 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 8.453 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01758/2.032, allocations: 2.78 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 5.68 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04201/2.074, allocations: 21.11 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 0.5898 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01176/2.086, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 11.18 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01842/2.104, allocations: 6.379 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.812 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002999/2.107, allocations: 427.4 kB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.395 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.32e-07/2.107, allocations: 0 / 1.501 GB, free: 4.395 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2433/2.351, allocations: 138.7 MB / 1.636 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 1.17 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches